|
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | [[image:136.2.jpg|center|775px]]
| + | {|style="padding: 0.3em; margin-left:15px; border:2px solid #a9a9a9; text-align:center; font-size: 95%; background:#f5f5f5" width="240px" align="center" |
| − | Federal regulations originating in Section 123(e) of the 1987 Surface Transportation and Uniform
| + | |- |
| − | Relocation Assistance Act (STURAA) provides that agencies (state, county, or city) may receive soft match credit for the cost of a locally funded bridge replacement or rehabilitation that would count toward the local match on federally funded bridge replacement projects. It is not the intent of the program to give credit for all bridge work that is done by the local agency, but only for the eligible replacement and rehabilitation work which is performed according to the appropriate guidelines.
| + | |'''This article was deleted''' |
| − | | + | |- |
| − | The bridge being replaced or rehabilitated for which the agency desires credit must meet the
| + | |MoDOT deemed this article's information to be obsolete. As such, it was deleted. Please consult the [[:Category:136 Local Public Agency (LPA) Policy|re-written EPG 136 LPA Policy]]. |
| − | contractual requirements of the local agency and the MoDOT intent of [[136.1 General#136.1.6.1 Highway Bridge Program|the Highway Brige Program]] (HBP) as defined under Federally Funded Bridge Projects in [[136.1 General|EPG 136.1 General]].
| + | |} |
| − | | |
| − | One of the purposes of the Bridge Soft Match Credit Program is to provide an alternate process
| |
| − | for local agencies to remove deficient bridges from the Bridge Inventory. A number of requirements that would apply to projects receiving HBP funding are waived in the Soft Match Credit Program. These exceptions are highlighted in bold print in this article.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''The federal contract requirements and clearances by federal agencies may be waived, but all state and local contract requirements and clearances shall still be met.''' Projects may be
| |
| − | constructed by qualified local agency forces, competitive bid, or negotiated bid. (Refer to [[136.9 Final Design|EPG 136.9 Final Design]] for information regarding work by local forces.)
| |
| − | | |
| − | The design drawings shall be prepared under the direction of a registered professional engineer and be signed and sealed by that engineer. By signing and sealing the drawings, the engineer of record will be representing that the MoDOT intent of the HBP has been met in accordance with the criteria set forth in [[136.1 General|EPG 136.1 General]]. A registered professional engineer shall direct the construction inspection.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===136.2.1 Project Selection=== | |
| − | The bridge must be on MoDOT's eligible list for funding for off federal aid routes. These functional classifications include rural local, rural minor collector and urban local.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Projects involving removal of an eligible bridge that is replaced with something other than a new bridge are eligible. (For example, replacing a bridge over an abandoned railroad with roadway fill.)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===136.2.2 Eligible Costs for Soft Match Credit===
| |
| − | An agency may receive credit for no more than 80% of the eligible costs. The items that are eligible for receiving credit include preliminary engineering services, surveys, environmental and cultural documentation, subsurface investigations, right of way services, bridge construction, minimal road construction, construction engineering for inspection, and those portions of utility relocation costs for which the county is obligated.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The following federal funds from other federal agencies may be used on credit projects but only up to a maximum of 20% of the eligible costs.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''1.''' Community Development Block Grant Funds if authorized by the Department of Housing and Urban Development
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''2.''' Local Public Works Funds authorized by the Economic Development Administration.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Any federal funds above this 20% will reduce the costs eligible for credit.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Only a minimal amount of approach roadway work may be counted. Eligible limits may include reasonable approach roadway necessary to connect to the existing road and to return the new grade to normal ground. This corresponds to the eligible limits of HBP projects authorized to date.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===136.2.3 Final Design===
| |
| − | On projects for which credit is desired, the engineer of record shall have the responsibility for the selection of the specific design parameters along with verifying that the MoDOT intent of the HBP is being met as described and given in [[136.1 General|EPG 136.1 General]] and [[136.8 Preliminary Design|EPG 136.8 Preliminary Design]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | The specifications and job special provisions for the project shall also be determined by the engineer based on specific site conditions and guidance given in [[136.9 Final Design|EPG 136.9 Final Design]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | A preconstruction itemized engineer's cost estimate is required to be retained by the engineer with the project file. This estimate will be based either on the local forces constructing the project or on a contractor constructing the project.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===136.2.4 Construction Letting===
| |
| − | '''The Federal Aid contract requirements of [[136.10 Construction Authorization and Letting|EPG 136.10 Construction Authorization and Letting]] are not required.''' When the local agency elects to build the project by contractor, then the State and Local requirements for competitive bidding shall be used.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===136.2.5 Construction===
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''The federal requirements for construction in [[136.11 Local Public Agency Construction|EPG 136.11 Local Public Agency Construction]] may be waived.''' The construction inspection, testing and sampling shall be done under the direction of a registered professional engineer.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===136.2.6 Request for Credit Submittal===
| |
| − | Formal acceptance of the project for credit will be requested by the local agency after the project has been completed, documentation of final construction cost submitted, and the bridge has been added to the bridge inventory. Submittal at the PS&E stage of the project is not necessary. However, if the engineer or local agency have specific eligibility questions regarding the project that they would like MoDOT to address before construction then we are receptive to receiving the PS&E submittal. Specific questions should be provided by the engineer or local agency on their cover letter with the submitted package.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The credit submittal should include the following:
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''1.''' As built plans and specifications (size 11 in. x 17in.) signed and sealed by a registered professional engineer and approved by the local agency. Refer to [[136.9 Final Design|EPG 136.9 Final Design]] for specific requirements.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''2.''' Structural Inventory and Appraisal (SI&A) sheet completed for the bridge improvement with load rating calculations and Load Rating Summary Sheet signed and sealed by a registered professional engineer. Refer to [[136.9 Final Design|EPG 136.9 Final Design]] for specific requirements.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''3.''' Beginning and completion dates for construction.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''4.''' A certification by the local agency stating that the project is non-controversial. For the purposes of the bridge credit program, "non-controversial" will be defined as meaning that the project does not have a history of litigation, disputes, negative media reports or any other controversy.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''5.''' A certification by the local agency stating that the project being considered has been constructed in accordance with the standards applicable to [[136.1 General#136.1.6.1 Highway Bridge Program|the HBP]], except as noted in EPG 136.2, that all of the required clearances were obtained prior to construction of the project and that the project was constructed substantially in conformity with the plans and specifications.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''6.''' Documentation of eligible final costs, and certification by the local agency that the costs claimed are the actual costs incurred. If quantities documented for costs don't match the list of quantities as compared to the engineer’s pre-construction itemized cost estimate, the local agency should submit justification for a change in the planned quantities. If the existing structure is currently eligible for rehabilitation only and the local agency elects to replace the structure, the amount of eligible federal funding will be limited to that which will not exceed the rehabilitation cost estimate unless appropriate justification is provided by the local agency that a new structure represents the best value. If the rehabilitation cost is at least 68% of the replacement costs, it can generally be assumed that the new replacement structure will provide a better value than the rehabilitation of the existing structure and therefore a better use of federal bridge funds.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''7.''' A minimum of two photographs showing a view of the bridge along roadway and a view of the bridge from the stream opening. Additional photographs showing the bridge construction are also recommended but not required.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''8.''' After the construction of the bridge has been completed, a final "walk-through" inspection of the bridge has to be completed by MoDOT. This final inspection has to be completed by someone in the district that has been Team Leader certified for nonstate bridge inspections as designated in [[:Category:753 Bridge Inspection Rating|EPG 753.3 Inspection and Reporting Aids (Section 3)]]. This inspection should include the assignment of appraisal and condition ratings consistent with the normal inspection practice for nonstate bridges. This inspection should also verify that the bridge is in "good" condition and was constructed in general conformance with the bridge plans (including verification of the bridge location, bridge type, width, length and the number of members). Once completed, the inspector should submit a copy of the inspection report and a letter to the district person overseeing credit projects indicating the date the bridge was inspected, that it was found to be in "good" condition and that the location, type, width, length and number of members match the plans indicating that the bridge was built in general conformance with the plans. Once this inspection is complete and all other required information is obtained from the local agency, the district should submit the bridge credit package to Bridge Division along with a cover letter recommending that credit be approved for this bridge project. The credit submittal package should include copies of the letter and inspection report from the inspector.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===136.2.7 Use of Soft Match Credit===
| |
| − | | |
| − | The eligible costs may apply as credit toward the 20% local match required on federal-aid bridge
| |
| − | projects. This credit provision does not increase an agency's allocation of [[136.1 General#136.1.6.1 Highway Bridge Program|HBP]] funds, but will permit usage of funds already allocated to an agency at a rate up to 100%.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Any BRO project submitted for programming by a local agency will be set up using soft match
| |
| − | credit, if available. As a result, the local agency's preliminary engineering costs will be eligible for more than 80% federal reimbursement. As the project moves to construction authorization, credit will continue to be applied, as long as it is available. Counties will not be allowed to have a negative soft match credit balance.
| |
| − | | |
| − | If a local agency does not want to use their soft match credit on a project, they will need to submit a letter to the MoDOT district office indicating this.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Soft match credit can be applied to the construction phase of a bridge project at the time of
| |
| − | construction authorization, even if soft match credit was not used for the design phase.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The federal reimbursable share of design costs can not be increased by applying additional soft match credit after the preliminary engineering authorization date.
| |
| − | | |
| − | A local agency may elect to transfer its soft match credit earned under the Off-System Bridge Credit Program to another local agency. The following guidelines should be followed to transfer credit:
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''1.''' A request must be submitted to the MoDOT district office on the local agency's letterhead, stating the receiving agency and the dollar amount. All the county commissioners or city officials must sign the request. | |
| − | | |
| − | '''2.''' The request must be approved prior to using the soft match credit on a bridge project.
| |
| − | | |
| − | A local agency may elect to transfer its soft match credit earned under the Off-System Bridge Credit Program to another local agency for BRO funds. The following guidelines should be followed to transfer credit for funds:
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''1.''' Both counties must submit requests to the MoDOT district office on their local agency's
| |
| − | letterhead, stating the amount of BRO funds and credit to be transferred by each county. All the county commissioners or city officials must sign the requests.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''2.''' The request must be approved prior to using the soft match credit and BRO funds on a bridge project.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''3.''' No transfer can result in a negative balance of BRO funds.
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[Category:136 Local Public Agency (LPA) Policy|136.02]] | |
