Category:941 Permits and Access Requests - Revision history

Hoskir: /* 941.8 Traffic Impact Study Requirements */ updated link to traffic impact studies

2026-10-20T15:31:57Z

941.8 Traffic Impact Study Requirements: updated link to traffic impact studies

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:31, 20 October 2026
Line 728:		Line 728:
	==941.8 Traffic Impact Study Requirements==		==941.8 Traffic Impact Study Requirements==

	{\| style="margin-left:15px; margin-top: 5px; border:1px solid #a9a9a9; background:#f8f9fa" width="~~310px~~" align="right"		{\| style="margin-left:15px; margin-top: 5px; border:1px solid #a9a9a9; background:#f8f9fa" width="275px" align="right"
	\|-		\|-
	\|style="text-align:center;" \| '''<u>Additional Information</u>'''		\|style="text-align:center;" \| '''<u>Additional Information</u>'''
	\|-		\|-
	\| ● [~~http~~://sharepoint/~~systemdelivery/TR/mo/arterialmgmt~~/~~accessmgmt~~/~~Shared~~%~~20Documents~~/Tips%20for%20Reviewing%20Traffic%20Impact%20Studies.docx Tips for Reviewing Traffic Impact Studies]		\| ● [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/ts/Access%20Management/Tips%20for%20Reviewing%20Traffic%20Impact%20Studies.docx?d=we6d96b7e810d4d0faed667bf5cfaafd5&csf=1&web=1&e=PeeHrv Tips for Reviewing Traffic Impact Studies (MoDOT Access Only)]
	\|}		\|}

Hoskir: /* 941.8 Traffic Impact Study Requirements */ updated per RR4270

2026-10-20T15:22:11Z

941.8 Traffic Impact Study Requirements: updated per RR4270

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:22, 20 October 2026
Line 727:		Line 727:

	==941.8 Traffic Impact Study Requirements==		==941.8 Traffic Impact Study Requirements==
	~~[[image:941.5 Traffic Impact Study Requirements.jpg\|right\|575px]]~~
	The policy of the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission and MoDOT is to discourage the proliferation of access points and conflict points within the state highway system. For larger developments where the access point requested will meet the guidelines for spacing, a traffic study will be required. To ensure operations on our roadway are not negatively impacted by the additional access, the developer will provide the required roadway improvements.		{\| style="margin-left:15px; margin-top: 5px; border:1px solid #a9a9a9; background:#f8f9fa" width="310px" align="right"
	{\|style="~~padding~~: ~~0.3em~~; margin-~~left~~:~~10px~~; border:~~2px~~ solid #a9a9a9~~; text-align:center; font-size: 95%~~; background:#~~f5f5f5~~" width="310px" align="right"
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''Additional Information'''		\|style="text-align:center;" \| '''<u>Additional Information</u>'''
	\|-		\|-
	\|[http://sharepoint/systemdelivery/TR/mo/arterialmgmt/accessmgmt/Shared%20Documents/Tips%20for%20Reviewing%20Traffic%20Impact%20Studies.docx Tips for Reviewing Traffic Impact Studies]		\| ● [http://sharepoint/systemdelivery/TR/mo/arterialmgmt/accessmgmt/Shared%20Documents/Tips%20for%20Reviewing%20Traffic%20Impact%20Studies.docx Tips for Reviewing Traffic Impact Studies]
	\|}		\|}

	The ~~amount~~ of ~~traffic generated by a proposed development seeking new or modified access to~~ the MoDOT ~~system~~ is the ~~basis for determining~~ the ~~contents of a traffic impact study~~. ~~The specific content of a traffic impact study~~ will ~~vary depending on~~ the ~~site and prevailing conditions. At a minimum~~, ~~contents of~~ a traffic ~~impact~~ study are ~~to include~~ the ~~following major sections~~, ~~taken from~~ the ~~current Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication entitled Transportation and Land Development:~~		The policy of the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission and MoDOT is to discourage the proliferation of access points and conflict points within the state highway system. For larger developments where the access point requested will meet the guidelines for spacing, a traffic study will be required. To ensure operations on our roadway are not negatively impacted by the additional access, the developer will provide the required roadway improvements.

	1. A description of existing conditions.		The amount of traffic generated by a proposed development seeking new or modified access to the MoDOT system is the basis for determining the contents of a traffic impact study. The specific content of a traffic impact study will vary depending on the site and prevailing conditions. At a minimum, contents of a traffic impact study are to include the following major sections, taken from the current Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication entitled Transportation and Land Development:
			# A description of existing conditions.
			# Estimated trip volume generated by the development and design hour volume for effected driveway(s). These volumes will be based on a method determined acceptable by the district. When ITE trip generation numbers are not appropriate, traffic counts at existing similar locations or other recognized methods can be required.
			# Trip distribution and traffic assignment.
			# Existing versus projected volumes.
			# Capacity analysis for adjacent roadway facilities and for any proposed or existing driveways.
			# Traffic crash analysis for adjacent roadway facilities.
			# Proposed traffic improvements and driveway/access points.
			# Main findings of the study.
			# Summary of findings and recommendations.

	2. ~~Estimated trip volume generated by the development~~ and design ~~hour volume for effected driveway(s)~~. ~~These volumes will be based on~~ a ~~method determined acceptable by the district. When ITE trip generation numbers are not appropriate~~, traffic ~~counts at existing similar locations or other recognized methods can be~~ required.		For small developments generating fewer than 100 vehicles during the peak hour, or roughly 1000 additional vehicles per day, a traffic impact study is normally not required. However, a review of access location and design is necessary and is to include an analysis of existing conditions, evaluation of sight distance, access design, queuing and site circulation. For any development with access that would qualify as a Hazard Elimination Program location, a traffic study is required to ensure safety is improved along the roadway in conjunction with any access improvements.

	~~3. Trip distribution~~ and ~~traffic assignment~~.		For developments generating between 100-500 peak trips, a traffic impact study is required and is to include an analysis of existing conditions at nearby driveways and intersections, crash experience near the site, trip generation, and an evaluation of the number, location and spacing of access points as a minimum.

	4. ~~Existing versus projected volumes.~~		Developments generating between 500-1,000 peak trips are expected to impact greater distances from the site. In addition to the required information for smaller scale development discussed above, the traffic impact studies for these developments are to consider the future of the roadway, background traffic growth and an analysis of future conditions of nearby intersections or interchanges.

	~~5. Capacity analysis~~ for ~~adjacent~~ roadway ~~facilities~~ and ~~for any proposed~~ or ~~existing driveways~~.		Large-scale development will generally impact the roadway system over a more regional area. A comprehensive analysis is warranted for large developments producing over 1,000 peak trips. Additional information such as mitigation identification and evaluation, gap analysis for unsignalized intersections, analysis of the effect on signal progression and proposed signal locations are included.

	6. ~~Traffic crash~~ analysis for ~~adjacent roadway facilities~~.

	~~7. Proposed traffic improvements~~ and ~~driveway/access points.~~

	~~8. Main findings~~ of the ~~study~~.

	~~9. Summary of findings and recommendations.~~		For all developments a sight distance evaluation should be completed and meet the criteria described in [[:Category:941_Permits_and_Access_Requests#941.7_Sight_Distance_for_Entrances\|EPG 941.7 Sight Distance for Entrances]]. Requests for public street entrances shall meet or exceed both Intersection Sight Distance (see [[:Category:941_Permits_and_Access_Requests#941.7.1.1_Intersection_Sight_Distance\|EPG 941.7.1.1]] and [[233.2_At-Grade_Intersections_with_Stop_and_Yield_Control#233.2.1_Intersection_Sight_Distance_Criteria\|EPG 233.2.1]]) and Stopping Sight Distance (see [[:Category:941_Permits_and_Access_Requests#941.7.1.2_Stopping_Sight_Distance\|EPG 941.7.1.2]]). The use of any other sight distance criteria will require authorization from the Central Office Highway Safety and Traffic Division.

	For ~~small~~ developments ~~generating fewer than 100 vehicles during the peak hour, or roughly 1000 additional vehicles per day,~~ a ~~traffic impact study is normally not required. However, a review of access location and design is necessary and is to include an analysis of existing conditions, evaluation of~~ sight distance~~, access design, queuing~~ and ~~site circulation. For any development with access that would qualify as a Hazard Elimination Program location, a traffic study is required to ensure safety is improved along~~ the ~~roadway~~ in ~~conjunction with any access improvements~~.

	~~For developments generating between 100~~-~~500 peak trips, a traffic impact study is required~~ and is to include an analysis of existing conditions at nearby driveways and intersections, crash experience near the site, trip generation, and an evaluation of the number, location and spacing of access points as a minimum.

	~~Developments generating between 500-~~1~~,000 peak trips are expected to impact greater distances from the site~~. In addition to the required information for smaller scale development discussed above, the traffic impact studies for these developments are to consider the future of the roadway, background traffic growth and an analysis of future conditions of nearby intersections or interchanges.

	~~Large-scale development will generally impact the roadway system over a more regional area~~. ~~A comprehensive analysis is warranted for large developments producing over~~ 1~~,000 peak trips~~. ~~Additional information such as mitigation identification and evaluation, gap analysis for unsignalized intersections, analysis~~ of the ~~effect on signal progression~~ and ~~proposed signal locations are included~~.

	At the pre-application meeting, the study limits of the traffic impact study are to include any adjacent intersections that could be impacted. Other specific parameters are set for the traffic impact study, including cycle lengths and operating speeds. A freeway analysis is included with any developments impacting existing or proposed interchanges. Consideration is given to what modeling software can be used for the analysis. The selected modeling software is to be capable of analyzing the systems effects of all impacted intersections and interchanges within the chosen study limits.		At the pre-application meeting, the study limits of the traffic impact study are to include any adjacent intersections that could be impacted. Other specific parameters are set for the traffic impact study, including cycle lengths and operating speeds. A freeway analysis is included with any developments impacting existing or proposed interchanges. Consideration is given to what modeling software can be used for the analysis. The selected modeling software is to be capable of analyzing the systems effects of all impacted intersections and interchanges within the chosen study limits.

	A summary of findings and recommendations is part of any traffic study. Developers are responsible for mitigating any unacceptable impacts to the roadway system by the construction of any needed roadway improvements, as indicated by the approved traffic impact study.		A summary of findings and recommendations is part of any traffic study. Developers are responsible for mitigating any unacceptable impacts to the roadway system by the construction of any needed roadway improvements, as indicated by the approved traffic impact study.

	Traffic studies may be required by local government organizations. In such situations, MoDOT is to coordinate with the local government and the applicant to ensure one study can meet the needs of all entities.		Traffic studies may be required by local government organizations. In such situations, MoDOT is to coordinate with the local government and the applicant to ensure one study can meet the needs of all entities.

	==941.9 Additional Information for Design, Construction and Maintenance of Entrances==		==941.9 Additional Information for Design, Construction and Maintenance of Entrances==

Hoskir: /* 941.6.3.4 Section 9 Requirements for Local Government Projects */ updated link to sovereign immunity limits

2026-08-10T19:27:18Z

941.6.3.4 Section 9 Requirements for Local Government Projects: updated link to sovereign immunity limits

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 10 August 2026
Line 428:		Line 428:

	====941.6.3.4 Section 9 Requirements for Local Government Projects====		====941.6.3.4 Section 9 Requirements for Local Government Projects====

	If the permit will be for a local government project, then the applicant must do the following:		If the permit will be for a local government project, then the applicant must do the following:

	:* Provide proof that they carry commercial general liability insurance and commercial automobile liability insurance from a company authorized to issue insurance in Missouri.		* Provide proof that they carry commercial general liability insurance and commercial automobile liability insurance from a company authorized to issue insurance in Missouri.
	:* Must name the Commission, MoDOT, and its employees as additional named insured in amounts sufficient to cover the [https://insurance.mo.gov/industry/~~sovimmunity.php~~ sovereign immunity limits] for Missouri public entities (as calculated by the Missouri Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions and Professional Registration, and published annually in the Missouri Register pursuant to [https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneChapter.aspx?chapter=537 537.610 R.S. Mo]).		* Must name the Commission, MoDOT, and its employees as additional named insured in amounts sufficient to cover the [https://insurance.mo.gov/industry-limits-and-caps/sovereign-immunity-limits sovereign immunity limits] for Missouri public entities (as calculated by the Missouri Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions and Professional Registration, and published annually in the Missouri Register pursuant to [https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneChapter.aspx?chapter=537 537.610 R.S. Mo]).

	====941.6.3.5 Storm Water Regulations====		====941.6.3.5 Storm Water Regulations====

Hoskir: /* 941.2.5 Quit Claim Deeds, General Warranty Deeds and Agreements */

2026-07-21T15:29:57Z

941.2.5 Quit Claim Deeds, General Warranty Deeds and Agreements

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:29, 21 July 2026
Line 205:		Line 205:

	===941.2.5 Quit Claim Deeds, General Warranty Deeds and Agreements===		===941.2.5 Quit Claim Deeds, General Warranty Deeds and Agreements===
	Once an access request has been approved (See [[:Category:941_Permits_and_Access_Requests#941.2.4_Approval_Authority\|EPG 941.2.4 Approval Authority]]), there is additional documentation and deed-work that needs to be completed. This guidance provides the required steps ([https://epg.modot.org/forms/general_files/DE/RW/Traffic_Agreement_and_Deed_Process.pdf Traffic Agreement and Deed Process]).It is important to remember that an access break within controlled access is a property right that is given and received by a recorded deed. Specific agreements may need to be executed as well.		Once an access request has been approved (See [[:Category:941_Permits_and_Access_Requests#941.2.4_Approval_Authority\|EPG 941.2.4 Approval Authority]]), there is additional documentation and deed-work that needs to be completed. This guidance provides the required steps ([https://epg.modot.org/forms/general_files/DE/ROW/Traffic_Agreement_and_Deed_Process.pdf Traffic Agreement and Deed Process]).It is important to remember that an access break within controlled access is a property right that is given and received by a recorded deed. Specific agreements may need to be executed as well.

	'''Quit Claim Deed'''		'''Quit Claim Deed'''

Hoskir: /* 941.2.5 Quit Claim Deeds, General Warranty Deeds and Agreements */ updated per RR4241

2026-07-21T15:11:15Z

941.2.5 Quit Claim Deeds, General Warranty Deeds and Agreements: updated per RR4241

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:11, 21 July 2026
Line 205:		Line 205:

	===941.2.5 Quit Claim Deeds, General Warranty Deeds and Agreements===		===941.2.5 Quit Claim Deeds, General Warranty Deeds and Agreements===
			Once an access request has been approved (See [[:Category:941_Permits_and_Access_Requests#941.2.4_Approval_Authority\|EPG 941.2.4 Approval Authority]]), there is additional documentation and deed-work that needs to be completed. This guidance provides the required steps ([https://epg.modot.org/forms/general_files/DE/RW/Traffic_Agreement_and_Deed_Process.pdf Traffic Agreement and Deed Process]).It is important to remember that an access break within controlled access is a property right that is given and received by a recorded deed. Specific agreements may need to be executed as well.
	Once an access request has been approved (See [[:Category:941_Permits_and_Access_Requests#941.2.4_Approval_Authority\|EPG 941.2.4 Approval Authority]]), there is additional documentation and deed-work that needs to be completed. It is important to remember that an access break within controlled access is a property right that is given and received by a recorded deed. Specific agreements may need to be executed as well.

	'''Quit Claim Deed'''		'''Quit Claim Deed'''

Hoskir: /* 941.10 Automated License Plate Readers and Pan-Tilt-Zoom Cameras */ updates per RR4220

2026-07-09T19:47:01Z

941.10 Automated License Plate Readers and Pan-Tilt-Zoom Cameras: updates per RR4220

Show changes

Legged1: /* 941.6.2 Two Forms for a Permit to Work on Right of Way */ updated link

2026-02-09T22:12:39Z

941.6.2 Two Forms for a Permit to Work on Right of Way: updated link

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 9 February 2026
Line 389:		Line 389:
	[[image:941.26 contractor.jpg\|right\|185px]]		[[image:941.26 contractor.jpg\|right\|185px]]

	There are two different forms for a Permit to Work on Right of Way: one for non-local government projects and one for local government projects. They appear very similar, but the important difference is Section 9 in the General Provisions. Applicants who need to have the Permit for Local Government projects have [[#941.6.3.4\|additional requirements]].		There are two different forms for a Permit to Work on Right of Way: one for non-local government projects and one for local government projects. They appear very similar, but the important difference is Section 9 in the General Provisions. Applicants who need to have the Permit for Local Government projects have [[#941.6.3.4 Section 9 Requirements for Local Government Projects\|additional requirements]].
	:* Permit for non-local government projects		:* Permit for non-local government projects
	::- This permit is for all contractors and individuals not doing work for public entities/local governments.		::- This permit is for all contractors and individuals not doing work for public entities/local governments.

Legged1: /* 941.6 Request for a Permit to Perform Work on MHTC’S Right of Way */ updated links

2026-02-09T22:04:37Z

941.6 Request for a Permit to Perform Work on MHTC’S Right of Way: updated links

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 9 February 2026
Line 372:		Line 372:
	Any work performed on the MHTC’s Right of Way requires a permit. Some requests are very simple and can be addressed quickly without much background information, while others may be highly complex and require a large amount of supporting documentation and collaboration with other parties.		Any work performed on the MHTC’s Right of Way requires a permit. Some requests are very simple and can be addressed quickly without much background information, while others may be highly complex and require a large amount of supporting documentation and collaboration with other parties.

	An external permits webpage is available for customers to request a permit to work on right of way, in addition to including important links relating to working on MHTC’s right of way.		An external [https://www.modot.org/permits permits webpage] is available for customers to request a permit to work on right of way, in addition to including important links relating to working on MHTC’s right of way.

	''Before granting a Permit to Perform Work on Right of Way, it is important to ensure that the request does not require higher level approval or a separate agreement by reviewing EPG 941 in its entirety.''		''Before granting a Permit to Perform Work on Right of Way, it is important to ensure that the request does not require higher level approval or a separate agreement by reviewing EPG 941 in its entirety.''
Line 387:		Line 387:

	===941.6.2 Two Forms for a Permit to Work on Right of Way===		===941.6.2 Two Forms for a Permit to Work on Right of Way===
			[[image:941.26 contractor.jpg\|right\|185px]]

	There are ~~[https://www.modot.org/printable-permit-application-forms~~ two different forms] for a Permit to Work on Right of Way: one for non-local government projects and one for local government projects. They appear very similar, but the important difference is Section 9 in the General Provisions. Applicants who need to have the Permit for Local Government projects have ~~additional requirements, as shown below.~~		There are two different forms for a Permit to Work on Right of Way: one for non-local government projects and one for local government projects. They appear very similar, but the important difference is Section 9 in the General Provisions. Applicants who need to have the Permit for Local Government projects have [[#941.6.3.4\|additional requirements]].
	[[~~image:~~941.~~31 Permits within the limits~~.~~jpg~~\|~~right\|350px~~]]
	:* Permit for non-local government projects		:* Permit for non-local government projects
	::- This permit is for all contractors and individuals not doing work for public entities/local governments.		::- This permit is for all contractors and individuals not doing work for public entities/local governments.
	:* Permit for local government projects		:* Permit for local government projects
	::- This permit is for all contractors performing work for public entities/local governments and for a public entity/local government performing the work with internal forces.		::- This permit is for all contractors performing work for public entities/local governments and for a public entity/local government performing the work with internal forces.
	::- o Additional requirements in Section 9 of the General Provisions – The applicant shall carry commercial general liability insurance and commercial automobile liability insurance from a company authorized to issue insurance in Missouri, and to name the Commission, and MoDOT and its employees, as additional named insured in amounts sufficient to cover the [https://insurance.mo.gov/industry/sovimmunity.php sovereign immunity] limits for Missouri public entities as calculated by the Missouri Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions and Professional Registration, and published annually in the Missouri Register pursuant to [https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneChapter.aspx?chapter=537 Section 537.610 R.S. Mo].

	===941.6.3 Evaluation Guidelines and Considerations===		===941.6.3 Evaluation Guidelines and Considerations===
Line 411:		Line 410:

	====941.6.3.3 Proposed Permit Work Within Limits of a Proposed or Active Project====		====941.6.3.3 Proposed Permit Work Within Limits of a Proposed or Active Project====
			[[image:941.31 Permits within the limits.jpg\|right\|350px]]

	'''Within Limits of a Proposed Project'''		'''Within Limits of a Proposed Project'''
Line 417:		Line 417:

	'''Within Limits of an Active Project'''		'''Within Limits of an Active Project'''
	~~[[image:941.26 contractor.jpg\|right\|185px\|thumb\|<center>'''Contractor'''</center>]]~~

	A project is considered active after notice to proceed date.		A project is considered active after notice to proceed date.

Hoskir: /* 941.9.8.4 Culvert Pipe */ updated per RR4131

2026-01-05T14:52:22Z

941.9.8.4 Culvert Pipe: updated per RR4131

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:52, 5 January 2026
Line 847:		Line 847:
	Corrugated metallic-coated steel culvert pipe shall be a commercially available new pipe so long as the pipe is fabricated by riveting, continuous welding, resistance spot welding or lock seam, and so long as the metal carries a brand designating a 2-ounce (600 g/m<sup>2</sup>) zinc coating or 1 ounce (300 g/m<sup>2</sup>) aluminum coating and the name of the sheet manufacturer. The metal thickness shall not be less than 16 gage (0.064 in., 1.63 mm). MoDOT’s representative may accept corrugated steel culvert pipe on the basis of visual inspection, or on the basis of a certification by the supplier stating the pipe complies with MoDOT requirements. MoDOT's representative reserves the right to require any testing deemed necessary to ensure compliance with these requirements. Reinforced concrete culvert pipe shall be a commercially available new pipe from a source that has furnished pipe for MoDOT work. MoDOT’s representative may accept the pipe on the basis of visual inspection, or on the basis of a certification by the supplier stating the pipe conforms to MoDOT requirements. MoDOT's representative reserves the right to require any testing deemed necessary to ensure compliance with these requirements.		Corrugated metallic-coated steel culvert pipe shall be a commercially available new pipe so long as the pipe is fabricated by riveting, continuous welding, resistance spot welding or lock seam, and so long as the metal carries a brand designating a 2-ounce (600 g/m<sup>2</sup>) zinc coating or 1 ounce (300 g/m<sup>2</sup>) aluminum coating and the name of the sheet manufacturer. The metal thickness shall not be less than 16 gage (0.064 in., 1.63 mm). MoDOT’s representative may accept corrugated steel culvert pipe on the basis of visual inspection, or on the basis of a certification by the supplier stating the pipe complies with MoDOT requirements. MoDOT's representative reserves the right to require any testing deemed necessary to ensure compliance with these requirements. Reinforced concrete culvert pipe shall be a commercially available new pipe from a source that has furnished pipe for MoDOT work. MoDOT’s representative may accept the pipe on the basis of visual inspection, or on the basis of a certification by the supplier stating the pipe conforms to MoDOT requirements. MoDOT's representative reserves the right to require any testing deemed necessary to ensure compliance with these requirements.

	Thermoplastic culvert pipe shall be a commercially available new pipe which is marked with the manufacturer's name or trademark, nominal size, the appropriate AASHTO designation, plant designation code, the date of manufacture or an appropriate code, and meets all requirements specified in the latest edition of the MoDOT standard specifications. MoDOT’s representative may accept thermoplastic culvert pipe on the basis of visual inspection, or on the basis of a certification by the supplier stating the pipe complies with all requirements of MoDOT Standard ~~Specifications~~ 730. MoDOT's representative reserves the right to require any testing deemed necessary to ensure compliance with these requirements.		Thermoplastic culvert pipe shall be a commercially available new pipe which is marked with the manufacturer's name or trademark, nominal size, the appropriate [https://store.accuristech.com/standards/aashto-m-294-21?product_id=2229875 AASHTO designation], plant designation code, the date of manufacture or an appropriate code, and meets all requirements specified in the latest edition of the MoDOT standard specifications. MoDOT’s representative may accept thermoplastic culvert pipe on the basis of visual inspection, or on the basis of a certification by the supplier stating the pipe complies with all requirements of MoDOT Standard Specification 730. MoDOT's representative reserves the right to require any testing deemed necessary to ensure compliance with these requirements.

	====941.9.8.5 Guardrail====		====941.9.8.5 Guardrail====

Hoskir: added category link

2025-12-30T20:34:58Z

added category link

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 30 December 2025
Line 1,068:		Line 1,068:
	* '''Maintenance –''' All LPR and PTZ devices as well as any new associated structures will be maintained by and at the expense of the applicant to assure that these structures will be kept in accordance with Commission standards and in good condition as to its safety, use and appearance. Maintenance activities will not cause an unreasonable interference with the use of or access to the Commission's state highway system. A new permit shall be required to perform future maintenance activities associated with the LPR and PTZ system.		* '''Maintenance –''' All LPR and PTZ devices as well as any new associated structures will be maintained by and at the expense of the applicant to assure that these structures will be kept in accordance with Commission standards and in good condition as to its safety, use and appearance. Maintenance activities will not cause an unreasonable interference with the use of or access to the Commission's state highway system. A new permit shall be required to perform future maintenance activities associated with the LPR and PTZ system.
	* '''Relocation/Removal –''' In the event the Commission deems it necessary to request the relocation or removal of these devices and their accompanying structures, the relocation or removal shall be accomplished by the applicant, in a manner prescribed by the Commission, with all costs and expenses associated with this task paid by the applicant. Should the applicant fail to remove the device in a timely matter, the Commission reserves the right to remove the devices from the right of way.		* '''Relocation/Removal –''' In the event the Commission deems it necessary to request the relocation or removal of these devices and their accompanying structures, the relocation or removal shall be accomplished by the applicant, in a manner prescribed by the Commission, with all costs and expenses associated with this task paid by the applicant. Should the applicant fail to remove the device in a timely matter, the Commission reserves the right to remove the devices from the right of way.


			[[Category:900 TRAFFIC CONTROL]]