903.10 Specific Service Signs (MUTCD Chapter 2J): Difference between revisions

From Engineering Policy Guide
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Smithk (talk | contribs)
Modot, modot
20,986 edits
m Per TS, article generally condensed to reflect Logo signs
Updated article due to MUTCD updates (See Special Ballot)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[image:903.9 Specific Service Sign.jpg|right|550px]]
[[Category:903 Highway Signing (MUTCD Part 2)|903.10]]
'''History.'''  MoDOT’s Logo program first became affective in 1991 and has been managed by a third party contractor from the beginning.  Up to 2010, MoDOT had a heavy involvement in the management of the program, this involved final execution of applicant contracts, maintaining a data base of participants, depositing funds collected from the applicant and redistributing funds back to the contractor for services rendered and even being responsible for maintaining the Logo signs for a significant portion of time.
[[File:Figure 903.10 Specific Service Sign.jpg|right|550px]]


In 2010 the Logo contract was renegotiated and the TODS and Logo contracts were combined into one program under one contract.  This renegotiated contract reformatted the way the program was managed. The new format was designed to align the program, applicant contracts and fee collection schedules with MoDOT’s fiscal year and the renewal date of the contract between the Commission and the contractor.  This was all done to prepare the program to be rebid in 2015 and allow for a clean transition should a new contractor be awarded the contract. From this point forward, MoDOT’s contractor assumed the full responsibility of the program to execute contracts, collect and track revenue as well as install and maintain all signs with their portion of the revenue.  MoDOT would receive a guaranteed annual revenue from this new program which would be deposited in the road fund to help maintain the state’s road and bridge network.  MoDOT’s role under this new program format is now limited to site plan reviews for new sign installations, reporting any sign damage to the contractor so they can correct it, and to serve as a resource on MoDOT’s Policy and the Code of State Regulations under which the programs were operated.
'''Support.''' MoDOT’s Logo contract signing program began in 1991 and was largely managed internally. In 2010, Tourist Oriented Destination Signing (TODS) was added to the Logo program and they were combined under one contract. Then, in 2015, a Code of State Regulation (7 CSR 10-17) was established which replaced the CSRs for TODS, Logos, Traffic Generator, and College signing, and included rules for State and Federal site signing, Welcome Center Affiliate Signing, and State Correctional Center Signing.
In 2015 the new Supplemental Guide Sign Program was created which included both the TODS and Logo programs as well as Traffic Generator signing, College Signing, State and Federal site signing, Welcome Center Affiliate Signing and State Correctional Center Signing.


A new CSR for this program was also established for this new program and replaced the CSRs for TODS, Logos, Traffic Generator and College signing and including rules for State and Federal site signing, Welcome Center Affiliate Signing and State Correctional Center Signing that once were MoDOT policy. A Request for Proposal was issued for the Supplemental Guide Sign Program and a new contract awarded, both the new CSR and the new contract became effective July 1, 2015.
Since 2015, MoDOT’s contractor has assumed full responsibility of the program to execute contracts, collect and track revenue, as well as install and maintain all signs with their portion of the revenue. MoDOT receives guaranteed annual revenue from this program which is deposited in the state road fund to help maintain the state’s road and bridge network. MoDOT’s role under this current program format is limited to site plan reviews for new sign installations, reporting any sign damage to the contractor so they can correct it, and to serve as a resource on MoDOT’s policy and Code of State Regulations under which the programs operate.


August of 2020 a new RFP was initiated advertising the Supplemental Guide Sign Program contract for the next 5-year management period, this contract became effective July 1, 2021 with no changes to the CSR.  
'''Standard.''' All requests for participation in the Logo program shall be forwarded to MoDOT’s Supplemental Guide Sign Program contractor for processing. Per the CSR, it is the program manager’s responsibility to receive all requests, evaluate eligibility and administer the contract with the applicant.


'''Standard.'''  All requests for participation in the Logo program shall be forwarded to MoDOT’s Supplemental Guide Sign Program contractor for processing.  Per the CSR, it is the program manager’s responsibility to receive all requests, evaluate eligibility and administer the contract with the applicant.
MoDOT districts’ role in the program is to review and approve site plans for new sign installations, assuring the new sign installations do not conflict with existing traffic control devices or create sight distance issues. Another critical responsibility is to identify and report damage and/or deficiencies with any of the signs to the program manager.


MoDOT districts’ role in the program is limited to reviewing and approving site plan reviews for new sign installations to assure these new sign installations are appropriate, looking for items such as, but not limited to, assuring the new installations do not conflict with existing traffic control devices, creating sight distance issues or create an issue for maintaining the right of way. Another critical responsibility is to identify and report damage and/or deficiencies with any of the signs the program manager is responsible to correct.
Central Office Highway Safety and Traffic Division shall be responsible for managing the Supplemental Guide Sign Program Contract, updating the CSR, and interpreting the intent of the CSR and program contract if there are questions or appeals from prospective applicants. Highway Safety and Traffic Division shall also be responsible for working with Governmental Relations on legislative issues.


[http://sp/sites/ts/Pages/default.aspx Central Office Highway Safety and Traffic Division] shall be responsible for managing the Supplemental Guide Sign Program Contract, updating the CSR, interpreting the intent of the CSR and the program contract if there are questions or appeals from prospective applicants.   Highway Safety and Traffic Division shall also be responsible for working with Governmental Relations on issues which may need to be addressed on the legislative side. If the Highway Safety and Traffic Division is unable to resolve an issue or concern it will be addressed by the Chief Safety and Operations Officer, Deputy Director and Chief Engineer and, if necessary, the Director.
The Logo program shall be managed in accordance with the Code of State Regulations 7 CSR 10-17 Supplemental Guide Sign Program and the Supplemental Guide Sign Program contract between the Commission and MoDOT’s third party contractor. The CSR is binding and has the effect of law. Exceptions and/or variations from the CSR are not permitted under normal conditions with the Director having the only authority to authorize such actions.


The Logo program shall be managed in accordance with the Code of State Regulations 7 CSR 10-17 Supplemental Guide Sign Program and the Supplemental Guide Sign Program contract between the Commission and MoDOT’s 3<sup>rd</sup> party contractor.  The CSR is binding and has the effect of law.  Exceptions and/or variations from the CSR are not permitted under normal conditions with the Director only having the authority to authorize such actions.
The rules contained within the CSR are based on, and are in conformance with, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and the AASHTO Guidelines for the Selection of Supplemental Guide Signs for Traffic Generators.


The rules contained within the CSR are based on, and are in conformance with, the [https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/ ''Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices''] and the ''AASHTO Guidelines for the Selection of Supplemental Guide Signs for Traffic Generators''.  
'''Support.''' Construction project guidance for Relocation of Service Signs is available in [[616.23 Construction Inspection Guidelines for Sec 616#616.23|EPG 616.23]]. Also reference "Supplemental Guide Signs" in the General Provisions for contractual requirements.
 
===903.10.1 Application (MUTCD Section 2J.02)===
[[Category:903 Highway Signing|903.11]]
'''Support.''' Information in this section supplements the primary guidance contained in 7 CSR 10-17.
 
'''Standard.''' The number of Specific Service signs along an approach to an interchange or intersection, regardless of the number of service types displayed, shall be limited to a maximum of four. In the direction of traffic flow, successive Specific Service signs shall be for attraction, camping, lodging, food, EV charging, and gas services, in that order.
 
'''Guidance.''' The Specific Service signs should be located to avoid visual conflict with other signs within the highway right-of-way.
 
Where a service type is displayed on two signs, the signs for that service should follow one another in succession.

Latest revision as of 12:17, 31 December 2025

Support. MoDOT’s Logo contract signing program began in 1991 and was largely managed internally. In 2010, Tourist Oriented Destination Signing (TODS) was added to the Logo program and they were combined under one contract. Then, in 2015, a Code of State Regulation (7 CSR 10-17) was established which replaced the CSRs for TODS, Logos, Traffic Generator, and College signing, and included rules for State and Federal site signing, Welcome Center Affiliate Signing, and State Correctional Center Signing.

Since 2015, MoDOT’s contractor has assumed full responsibility of the program to execute contracts, collect and track revenue, as well as install and maintain all signs with their portion of the revenue. MoDOT receives guaranteed annual revenue from this program which is deposited in the state road fund to help maintain the state’s road and bridge network. MoDOT’s role under this current program format is limited to site plan reviews for new sign installations, reporting any sign damage to the contractor so they can correct it, and to serve as a resource on MoDOT’s policy and Code of State Regulations under which the programs operate.

Standard. All requests for participation in the Logo program shall be forwarded to MoDOT’s Supplemental Guide Sign Program contractor for processing. Per the CSR, it is the program manager’s responsibility to receive all requests, evaluate eligibility and administer the contract with the applicant.

MoDOT districts’ role in the program is to review and approve site plans for new sign installations, assuring the new sign installations do not conflict with existing traffic control devices or create sight distance issues. Another critical responsibility is to identify and report damage and/or deficiencies with any of the signs to the program manager.

Central Office Highway Safety and Traffic Division shall be responsible for managing the Supplemental Guide Sign Program Contract, updating the CSR, and interpreting the intent of the CSR and program contract if there are questions or appeals from prospective applicants. Highway Safety and Traffic Division shall also be responsible for working with Governmental Relations on legislative issues.

The Logo program shall be managed in accordance with the Code of State Regulations 7 CSR 10-17 Supplemental Guide Sign Program and the Supplemental Guide Sign Program contract between the Commission and MoDOT’s third party contractor. The CSR is binding and has the effect of law. Exceptions and/or variations from the CSR are not permitted under normal conditions with the Director having the only authority to authorize such actions.

The rules contained within the CSR are based on, and are in conformance with, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and the AASHTO Guidelines for the Selection of Supplemental Guide Signs for Traffic Generators.

Support. Construction project guidance for Relocation of Service Signs is available in EPG 616.23. Also reference "Supplemental Guide Signs" in the General Provisions for contractual requirements.

903.10.1 Application (MUTCD Section 2J.02)

Support. Information in this section supplements the primary guidance contained in 7 CSR 10-17.

Standard. The number of Specific Service signs along an approach to an interchange or intersection, regardless of the number of service types displayed, shall be limited to a maximum of four. In the direction of traffic flow, successive Specific Service signs shall be for attraction, camping, lodging, food, EV charging, and gas services, in that order.

Guidance. The Specific Service signs should be located to avoid visual conflict with other signs within the highway right-of-way.

Where a service type is displayed on two signs, the signs for that service should follow one another in succession.

Retrieved from "https://epg.modot.org/index.php?title=903.10_Specific_Service_Signs_(MUTCD_Chapter_2J)&oldid=57104"