|
|
| (10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==949.1 Advisory Speed Plaque (Ballbanking)==
| |
| | | | |
| − | The procedure to determine the safe speed on a curve or turn is a ball bank study. To correctly use the ball bank indicator, the ball bank indicator should be mounted on the dashboard of a passenger car and adjusted to read "0" when the car is stationary on a level grade with the ball bank indicator being in a vertical plane. When adjusting the indicator, all personnel who are to be in the car while testing should be in their seats and all four tires should have the same pressure. It is usually best for at least two persons to be in the car while taking the ball bank reading: one for driving, the other for observation and recording.
| + | {|style="padding: 0.3em; margin-left:15px; border:2px solid #a9a9a9; text-align:center; font-size: 95%; background:#f5f5f5" width="340px" align="center" |
| − | | |
| − | The 10-degree reading that can be maintained the complete length of a curve is the appropriate safe speed for that curve. Care must be taken to maintain the car in its proper lane and to maintain a smooth even speed throughout the curve. It will occasionally be found that a curve will have a higher safe speed in one direction than the other. In such cases, the lower safe speed should be used for both directions. Only increments of 5 mph are used on the [[903.6 Warning Signs#903.6.49 Advisory Speed Supplemental Plaque (W13-1) (MUTCD Section 2C.46)|Advisory Speed Plaque]], therefore the curve shall be posted to the nearest 5 mph speed from the survey.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==949.2 Requests from Cities for Annexations==
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[image:949.2 request from cities for Annexations.jpg|left|475px]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | All requests from city officials for voluntary annexation of Commission right of way and other Commission-owned property should be submitted to the respective district office. The request must include a statement from the city officials verifying all adjacent property owners, the county where the area to be annexed is located, and all cities within a five-mile radius of the area to be annexed have been notified of the pending annexation and their reaction to that notice.
| |
| − | | |
| − | If, in the opinion of the District Engineer, the request documents contain no evidence of significant controversy and the annexation would not be detrimental to the transportation system or the Commission, the District Engineer is authorized to approve the request and execute the related Petition for Voluntary Annexation. Further, the District Engineer may deny requests for voluntary annexation when, in his/her opinion, such denial is warranted.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Petitions for Voluntary Annexations will not require approval as to form by the Chief Counsel’s office or attestation of the Secretary of the Commission.
| |
| − | | |
| − | In all cases where the Petition for Involuntary Annexation is filed against the Commission or MoDOT, the Chief Counsel’s office shall make its entry of appearance in the case and take a non-adversarial position unless justification exists for opposing the involuntary annexation, in which case the Chief Counsel’s office shall enter an appropriate defense.
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[media:949.2 Checklist for Request of Annexations.doc|A checklist for request of annexations]] is available.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==949.3 Voiding City Ordinances on State Routes with Inappropriate Speed Limits==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Paragraph 4 of House Bill 1047 of the 88<sup>th</sup> General Assembly states that the Commission may declare any ordinance void if it finds that ordinance is:
| |
| − | | |
| − | 1. Not primarily designed to expedite traffic flow; and
| |
| − | | |
| − | 2. Primarily designed to produce revenue for the city, town or village that enacted the ordinance.
| |
| − | | |
| − | If the District Engineer believes that a city, village or town has enacted such an ordinance, he shall see that the following actions are taken:
| |
| − | | |
| − | 1. Advise the city that a study will be made to determine the appropriate speed limit in the area.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 2. If a speed limit ordinance is found to be inappropriate as determined by a traffic engineering study and is determined to be for the purpose of producing revenue, a letter shall be sent to the city advising that their speed limit appears inappropriate and request a meeting with the city to discuss the matter.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 3. If a consensus cannot be obtained between the department and the city, the city would be notified of the date that the department’s recommendation will be presented to the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 4. If the Commission determines that the city speed limit is not correct as presently posted, the city shall be asked to adjust to the proper speed limit as determined by the Commission. If the city does not comply, the city speed limit ordinance will be declared void and posted as determined by the Commission.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 5. The city will then be notified of the Commission action and advised that all enforcement must be adjudicated through state courts unless the city passes and ordinance specifying the speed limit is the same as has been posted.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==949.4 Prevailing Speed Determination==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Prevailing speed determination is the method used by the department as criteria for speed limit determination in incorporated and unincorporated areas.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Three separate sets of data shall be utilized to establish the prevailing speed. These are:
| |
| − | | |
| − | *85<sup>th</sup> percentile speed; used only when ADT is 500 or greater;
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Upper limit of the ten MPH pace; used only when ADT is 500 or more; and
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Average test run speed.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The prevailing speed of free flowing traffic shall be determined and the average of the actual value established for the three criteria above.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Based on the assumption that the majority of the drivers, approximately 85 percent, will drive at a speed that they judge to be safe and proper, the selected speed limit in 5 mph increments will not exceed the established prevailing speed by more than 3 mph.
| |
| − | | |
| − | When justified by further investigation, the selected speed limit may be less than the established prevailing speed. Justification for reduction will be determined by a study of the following conditions.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :1. Accident Rate | |
| − | | |
| − | :2. Access to Driveways
| |
| − | | |
| − | :3. Traffic Control Devices
| |
| − | | |
| − | :4. Length of Section
| |
| − | | |
| − | :5. Pedestrian Traffic
| |
| − | | |
| − | :6. Parking
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===949.4.1 Accident Rate (AR)===
| |
| − | | |
| − | If the accident rate, based on reportable accidents within the proposed zone, is 50 percent higher than the statewide average accident rate (SWAR) for the same classification of highways, prevailing speed may be reduced by 5 percent. If the accident rate is more than twice the statewide rate for this classification, the prevailing speed may be reduced by 10 percent. Minor accidents, not reportable under state statutes, are not to be considered since the reduction in speed will not normally reduce the number of accidents but may reduce the severity of those accidents that occur. Current information regarding accident rates can be found in TMS.
| |
| − | | |
| − | =====<center>Table 949.4.1 Prevailing Speed Reduction</center>=====
| |
| − | {| border="1" class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto"
| |
| − | |+
| |
| − | ! style="background:#BEBEBE"|Reduction Condition !! style="background:#BEBEBE"|Pevailing Speed Reduction
| |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | | align="center"| AR > 0.5 SWAR || align="center"| 5% | + | |'''This article has moved''' |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | | align="center"| AR > 2.0 SWAR || align="center"|10% | + | |In April 2021, the content of EPG 949.1 Voiding City Ordinances on State Routes with Inappropriate Speed Limits was clarified and moved to [[905.2 Traffic Studies#905.2.13 Voiding City Ordinances on State Routes with Inappropriate Speed Limits|EPG 905.2.13 Voiding City Ordinances on State Routes with Inappropriate Speed Limits]]. The content of EPG 949.2 Speed Limit Guidelines was moved to [[905.2 Traffic Studies#905.2.14 Speed Limit Guidelines|EPG 905.2.14 Speed Limit Guidelines]]. |
| | |} | | |} |
| − |
| |
| − | ===949.4.2 Access to Driveway===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The effect of driveway entrances will be determined by using a Driveway Conflict Number. For this purpose, a private or field entrance shall have a Driveway Conflict Number of 1. Minor commercial entrances shall have a number of 5. Major commercial entrances, shopping centers or industrial plant entrances that generate relatively high volumes of traffic, and public streets shall have a number of 10. If the total Driveway Conflict Number exceeds a rate of 40 per mile through the proposed zone, the prevailing speed may be reduced by 5 percent. If the total number exceeds a rate of 60 per mile, the prevailing speed may be reduced by 10 percent. However, before a reduction can be made due to the Driveway Conflict Number, the Poisson Curve must be used to determine if the accident reduction is statistically significant.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[image:949.4.2 Driveway Conflict.jpg|center|550px|thumb|<center>'''Figure 949.4.2'''</center>]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The test is as follows:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | a) Consult Fig. 949.4.2, using the current number of accidents for the last year.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | b) Determine the graph’s percent value from the Poisson Curve.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | c) Compute accident rate for last year.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::<math>\mbox{Accident Rate}=\frac{\mbox{no. of crashes x 100,000,000}}
| |
| − | {\mbox{365 x ADT x length in miles}}</math>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | d) Obtain Statewide Accident Rate (SWAR). The accident data is obtained from the Transportation Management System (TMS).
| |
| − |
| |
| − | e) Calculate percent reduction between accident rate and statewide accident rate by:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::<math>\mbox{Percent Reduction}={100}\frac{\mbox{AR-SWAR}}
| |
| − | {\mbox{AR}}</math>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | f) Compare % reduction with value obtained in step b.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | g) If % reduction equals or exceeds value obtained in step b, the Driveway Conflict Number may be used as the action would be statistically significant.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''Example:'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :8.0-mile section of roadway, ADT = 3,100, 30 accidents within last year.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :a & b). Value obtained from Fig. 949.4.2 = 30 %
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :c).<math>\mbox{AR}=\mbox{331.4}=\frac{\mbox{30(100,000,000)}}
| |
| − | {\mbox{(365)(3,100)(8.0)}}</math>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :d). SWAR = 242.04
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :e).<math>\mbox{26.9 percent reduction}={100}\frac{\mbox{331.4-242.04}}
| |
| − | {\mbox{331.4}}</math>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :f). Compare % reduction with value.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::26.9 < 30
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Since 26.9 is less than 30, the Driveway Conflict Number cannot be considered.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===949.4.3 Traffic Control Devices===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Sections of roadway consisting of a curvy or series of curves and turns and other geometric problems should be signed with the appropriate [[903.6 Warning Signs|warning signs]] where it is customary to use these signs. [[903.5 Regulatory Signs#903.5.8 SPEED LIMIT Sign (R2-1) (MUTCD Section 2B.13)|Speed limit signs]] would not be considered where a warning sign is needed to advise the motorist of an approaching condition.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===949.4.4 Length of Section ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Enter the distance.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===949.4.5 Pedestrian Traffic ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Where sidewalks are not provided adjacent to the route and a total pedestrian traffic along the route exceeds 10 per hour for 3 hours of any 8-hour period, the prevailing speed may be reduced by 5 percent. Pedestrians crossing the route may be counted if the point of crossing is not protected by some other form of traffic control device.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===949.4.6 Parking ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Where parking is permitted adjacent to the traffic lane, the prevailing speed may be reduced by 5 percent. The prevailing speed determined by the 85<sup>th</sup> percentile speed, the pace speed and the average test run shall not be reduced by more than 10 mph by using Steps a through f of 949.4.2. All reductions shall be in 5 mph increments.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===949.4.7 Procedures for Obtaining Prevailing Speed Data===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Spot speed studies can be made with any speed measurement device such as radar, count cards and inductive loops that determine the 85<sup>th</sup> percentile speed and the upper limit of the 10 mph pace. The 85<sup>th</sup> percentile speed is defined as the speed at or below which 85 percent of the vehicles are traveling. The 10 mph pace is defined as the 10 mph range containing the most vehicles.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Spot speed studies should be made as close to the center of the proposed zone as is practical. If the zone is lengthier than one mile, studies should be made at a minimum of two locations. If the difference in data between the two locations is minor, the higher value should be used. If the difference in data is over 5 mph, consideration should be given to designating separate zones.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Exercise care to collect the data in a manner and at times that indicate normal conditions. Normal conditions will be assumed to prevail under good weather conditions on dry pavement, following morning rush hours and prior to the evening rush hours, on any day of the week except Saturdays, Sundays or holidays. Observations should not be made immediately following a significant event or during a period of greater than normal police enforcement. Every effort should be made to disguise or conceal the fact that speeds are being reported.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Speeds should be observed for a least 100 passenger cars and pick-up trucks. Trucks over 4 tons will not be included in the data for determining a revised limit.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Average test run speeds shall be determined on the basis of at least two runs in each direction over the length of the proposed zone. The prime consideration in these test runs is to determine a maximum permissible speed. Speeds are to be recorded at 0.1-mile intervals. While making the test run, the driver will try to “float” in the traffic stream, passing as many vehicles as pass the test car.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===949.4.8 Additional Guidelines for Establishing Speed Limits===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Normally, isolated curves and turns, areas of restricted sight distance, no passing zones, etc. will not be considered as areas for lowering speed limits. The accident record on such highways will be the principle criterion. Critical speed signs shall be used in connection with the appropriate warning signs at these locations.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Except on divided highways, different speeds for traffic in opposite directions cannot be justified.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Speed limits shall begin at a point on or as near in advanced of the point as possible where the speed limit is warranted and shall end at the point or as near the point as possible where the speed limit is not warranted.
| |
