643.2 Local Utility Adjustments - Public and Private
- 1 643.2.1 Introduction
- 1.1 6220.127.116.11 Location of Existing Utilities
- 1.2 618.104.22.168 Request for Utility Adjustment Plan
- 1.3 622.214.171.124 Proposed Utility Adjustment Plans
- 1.4 6126.96.36.199 Cost Responsibility
- 1.5 6188.8.131.52 Right of Way
- 1.6 6184.108.40.206 Service Lines Owned by Property Owners
- 1.7 6220.127.116.11 Notice of Hearing
- 1.8 618.104.22.168 Agreements
- 1.9 622.214.171.124 Lump Sum Agreements
- 1.10 6126.96.36.199 Actual Cost Agreements
- 1.11 6188.8.131.52 Master Reimbursable Utility Agreements
- 1.12 6184.108.40.206 Utility Agreement for Utility Work Included in Roadway Improvement Project
- 1.13 6220.127.116.11 Advance Payments
- 1.14 618.104.22.168 City or County Owned Utilities
- 1.15 622.214.171.124 Utility Plans
- 1.16 6126.96.36.199 Estimates
- 1.17 6188.8.131.52 Qualifying Statements
- 1.18 6184.108.40.206 Scope of Work
- 1.19 6220.127.116.11 Betterment
- 1.20 618.104.22.168 Accrued Depreciation Credit
- 1.21 622.214.171.124 Removal and Salvage of Materials
- 1.22 6126.96.36.199 Cost Records
- 1.23 6188.8.131.52 Schedule
- 1.24 6184.108.40.206 Other
- 1.25 6220.127.116.11 Material Costs
- 1.26 618.104.22.168 Labor Charges
- 1.27 622.214.171.124 Overhead Costs
- 1.28 643.2.1 28 Equipment Charges
- 1.29 6126.96.36.199 Removal Costs
- 1.30 6188.8.131.52 Engineering Costs
- 1.31 6184.108.40.206 Prorating Costs
- 1.32 6220.127.116.11 Lump Sum Estimates
- 1.33 618.104.22.168 Actual Cost Estimates
- 1.34 622.214.171.124 Confidentially and Payment
- 1.35 6126.96.36.199 Lightcore, a Centurytel Company, Agreement
- 1.36 6188.8.131.52 Performance of the Work
- 1.37 6184.108.40.206 Utility Permit Application Provisions for Work on MHTC Right of Way
- 1.38 6220.127.116.11 Location of Parallel Utility Facilities
- 1.39 618.104.22.168 Roadway Plans and Job Special Provisions
- 1.40 622.214.171.124 Changes in Approval Work
- 1.41 6126.96.36.199 Final Invoice for Utility Work
- 1.42 6188.8.131.52 Appropriate Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) on Utility Mapping
- 2 643.2.2 Construction Inspection Guidelines for Utilities
- 2.1 6184.108.40.206 Relocation Of Utility Facilities
- 2.2 6220.127.116.11 Preconstruction Meetings
- 2.3 618.104.22.168 Authorization To Proceed
- 2.4 622.214.171.124 Utility Contract And Equipment Rental Procedures
- 2.5 6126.96.36.199 Emergency
- 2.6 6188.8.131.52 Field Inspection
- 2.7 6184.108.40.206 Changes In Approved Utility Work
- 2.8 6220.127.116.11 Maintaining Construction Records
- 2.9 618.104.22.168 Payment To Utility Companies For Reimbursable Work
- 2.10 622.214.171.124 Department Inspection And Surveying Coding
- 2.11 6126.96.36.199 Policy
The Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission (MHTC) has established criteria for the uniform handling and the desired location or relocation of utility facilities on the right of way for each type of highway in the state highway system. These criteria are intended to provide maximum safety to the highway user, to preserve the traffic capacity of the roadway and to minimize interference with maintenance activities.
The criteria apply to all public and private utilities, including power transmission, telephone, water, gas, petroleum products, steam, sewer, drainage and other facilities. These utilities involve underground, surface or overhead facilities, either singly or in combination. The criteria applies to utilities located on right of way owned or leased by the utility owners and to utilities on existing public streets, roads and highways which are being included in new highway right of way. The criteria are not intended to impose restrictions on future installations of utility crossings of the roadway that would obstruct the development of areas adjacent to the roadway.
These criteria do not apply to utilities that provide service to facilities required to operate the roadway.
These specific criteria are fully described in EPG 643.3 Policy, Standards and Regulations.
6188.8.131.52 Location of Existing Utilities
The review of existing utilities on a proposed improvement and the determination of the necessity of adjustment is the responsibility of the district with assistance from Design.
The location of existing utilities will be established by a field survey and shown on the roadway plans. Early contact with local utility representatives may be necessary to accurately locate underground facilities.
Each district utility engineer (DUE) shall hold a minimum of one annual meeting with utilities to discuss current STIP projects in their district. The annual meeting shall be held during each years STIP preparations, ideally between January and May. The DUE shall invite all utility companies that have facilities in the district. The intent is to provide the utility companies with an idea of upcoming projects to allow them the opportunity to plan and budget for potential adjustment of their facilities, identify both MoDOT and utility company roadblocks, and develop action plans in order to complete utility relocations better, faster and cheaper.
The DUE, in conjunction with the project manager, is expected to invite and encourage participation of utility company representatives on MoDOT core teams as needed.
6184.108.40.206 Request for Utility Adjustment Plan
A flow diagram for project specific utility adjustments is available. The diagram has fewer steps when a Master Reimbursable Utility Agreement (MRUA) has been signed. Roadway plans are furnished to utility companies (this also includes cities, water and sewer districts and other quasi-public bodies) for use in planning required utility adjustments. A letter transmits the plans so the utility can be informed of the allocation of adjustment costs; if they are to be borne by the utility, by the state or shared by both parties. If any part of the adjustment is reimbursable, they are advised:
- They are authorized to proceed with preliminary engineering using their own personnel
- Replacement right of way or easements cannot be purchased without specific approval and authorization
- No physical adjusting or relocating of their facilities to accommodate the proposed highway improvement is to be performed
- Only preliminary engineering costs for work performed in advance of the date of written authorization to proceed will qualify for reimbursement
- That they may employ a consultant to do this work provided they request and obtain PRIOR approval
If the utility chooses to use a consultant for preliminary engineering or construction engineering work, their request must contain the following information:
- A statement that they are not staffed or able to perform the preliminary and/or construction engineering with their own personnel.
- A statement describing the process used to select the consultant; or, if a consultant is to be employed under a “continuing contract,” a copy of the contract must be provided.
- The name and address of the consultant.
- The consultant's fixed (lump sum) or estimated fee (actual cost) and the maximum amount of the contract.
- A cost summary providing a detailed breakdown of the consultant’s compensation, including estimated labor hours, hourly rates for each classification, overhead rate (if used), the amount of profit charged, and any other estimated charges such as travel expenses, telephone etc. If an overhead rate is used, the consultant must also submit the supporting overhead rate calculations.
- An estimate of the cost of the utility adjustment provided in as much detail as possible (this is a best estimate similar to what the consultant would use when furnishing their usual proposal for engineering services).
- A statement that the "Certification of Consultant" will be furnished immediately upon award of the contract to the consultant. If the request is for the use of a consultant employed by the utility under a "continuing contract", the "Certification of Consultant" is furnished with the request.
- A copy of the continuing contract shall be maintained in the file of the District Utilities Engineer (DUE).
Normally, it is advantageous to suggest a corridor plan of relocation to the company for adjustments to their facilities. In this way, proper coordination and sharing of available right of way with other utility facilities can be readily accomplished. Plan details for their adjustment will be left to the company to reduce department liability.
Close and timely communication with utilities affected by the roadway improvement will be necessary to ensure timely submittals of relocation plans.
6220.127.116.11 Proposed Utility Adjustment Plans
Utility relocations or adjustments are to be shown on the roadway plan and profile sheets or special utility sheets that will be furnished to the utility for their use. If the utility desires to prepare plans similar to those used for their own work, these plans must contain a legend on the first sheet identifying the utility symbols used. They must also show the existing facilities, their disposition, the location of the new or adjusted facilities, the existing and new right of way lines, the limited or fully controlled access symbols (where applicable), the existing and proposed roadways, ramps, and outer roadways and any other pertinent roadway information. The width of right of way at the time of construction of the original utility facility is most important in determining the allocation of cost. Relocated and/or existing facilities that will remain in place must be dimensioned or indicated in a manner to show their location in respect to the right of way lines.
Plans received from the utility company are to be checked for compliance with the MoDOT’s requirements (EPG 643.3 Policy, Standards and Regulations). They are also checked to insure compatibility with the roadway design. Any conflicts are resolved through negotiations with the utility.
It is the responsibility of the MoDOT project manager (PM) to ensure utiility relocation plans are shown on the project plans at the plan, specification and estimate (PS&E) stage while the DUE coordinates this information with the appropriate utility company. The PM will make reference, in the PS&E cover letter, of any issue related to existing utility facilities or the relocation of utilities shown or not shown on the plans. Since the addition of utility information on the plans, supplied by a third party, could subject the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission to additional liability, a utility JSP will be required.
Occasionally it is impractical to locate a utility adjustment in accordance with MoDOT’s requirements. Sometimes the utility may request approval of a plan of adjustment that does not conform to these requirements. Deviation from MoDOT’s utility requirements is a variance. The DUE will review the adjustment proposal. If they can recommend it for approval, the outlined procedure and guidance will be used. Their approval is documented by using the Utility Variance Approval Form that is submitted to the Design Division.
618.104.22.168 Cost Responsibility
The allocation of cost for any utility adjustment is determined based upon the information contained in EPG 643.3 Policy, Standards and Regulations.
Adjustments determined to be the sole cost of the utility are to be completed under the terms of a permit issued by the district. A "Waiver of Hearing" statement will be obtained for each adjustment that is the partial or sole cost of the utility (a sample transmittal letter to the utility for the Waiver of Hearing statement is available).
Adjustments determined to be partially or entirely reimbursable by the Commission are to be completed under the terms of an agreement executed between the utility and the Commission.
All utility adjustment work, whether by permit or agreement, will be inspected by the district and the location recorded on the final plans of the project.
622.214.171.124 Right of Way
The Commission is obligated to acquire only that width of right of way required by the design for the roadway improvement. When utility facilities are located on a company's private right of way, the company may obtain its own new easements. A determination will be made in the planning stage for the roadway improvement whether these easements can be readily obtained. If the company cannot negotiate for new easements or the company’s policy will not permit it to condemn property to obtain the easement, the Commission can acquire the easement in the same manner roadway right of way is obtained. It is the responsibility of the company to request the Commission perform this service. Every effort will be made to establish the need for the Commission to obtain these easements prior to final negotiations with the property owners
It is possible that the utility is located on private land without written easement rights. The Commission will honor this oral right provided acceptable documentation is furnished to Design. An example of acceptable documentation is available. Other forms of documentation will be considered on an individual basis.
The cost of replacement right of way is reimbursable, providing it is included in the plan and estimate supporting the agreement and that the purchase is made either after specific authority is given to purchase right of way or after authorization to proceed with all adjustment work is given. If the company desires, or needs to purchase right of way as part of the utility adjustment prior to MoDOT authorization, this request will be made to the district office. The review and approval process to accomplish this action is described. The request will be supported with two copies of a plan showing the existing location and proposed location of the company's facilities and an estimate of the right of way cost.
Occasionally, when negotiations cannot be completed for easements and adjustment of utility facilities, it will be necessary to condemn for the property. Established procedures require coordination between the Right of Way Division and district personnel (R/W – DUE) of their overlapping responsibilities. District right of way personnel, before filing for condemnation, will determine the status of utility adjustments. At that time, the district must decide whether or not it will be necessary to include the utility company in these condemnation proceedings. This decision will require the exercise of good judgment in reaching the conclusion that further negotiations are futile and condemnation is necessary to maintain the project in the scheduled bid opening.
Easement and other right of way documents used with utility companies are handled in accordance with procedures established jointly with the Right of Way Division and district personnel (R/W – DUE).
Should regulated utility facilities be located on Commission-owned property which is considered "excess" and therefore, subject to conveyance and relinquishment, certain procedures must be followed. These are described in EPG 236.5.12 Excess Land Conveyances & Relinquishments – Regulated Utilities
District right of way personnel prepare land descriptions for use in utility easements. The District Utilities Engineer (DUE) is responsible for the completion of the easements in the correct form and scope. A sketch delineating the area described is attached to the easement for reference purposes only and is generally not to be recorded. This sketch may be very helpful in computing the allocation of cost for future adjustments that may be required. Communication with the Design Division will ensure use of proper forms, corporate names and locations, and particular wording required for joint ownerships. The description for utility easements is to be referenced to the nearest land corner shown on the plans. Examples of easements can be found on the Chief Counsel’s Office (CCO) intranet website.
One strategy to make project delivery more efficient and ensure regulatory compliance is for MoDOT to obtain the environmental and cultural resource permits and clearances for the utility companies associated with a roadway improvement while obtaining its own. This would generally be for only the permits and regulatory clearances MoDOT already needs to pursue as a part of the transportation improvement.
When joint permitting and clearances are considered feasible, the DUE (as prompted by the project manager) must contact the utility company early in the project time line (i.e. preliminary plan stage) to identify their easement needs. MoDOT will establish a line of communication with the utility company so that information on known environmental and cultural resources and permitting time constraints can be conveyed. This also enables the utility companies to avoid resources so the project schedule can be met.
Early notification of the utility is mandatory to allow sufficient time for the utility to prepare relocation plans and provide the DUE with appropriate easement needs. As a minimum, the DUE is to verify the utility is aware of MoDOT’s opportunity to acquire the easements and they are to receive a written “yes” or “no” from the utility concerning their desire for MoDOT to acquire the necessary easements.
The project manager must insure proper documentation is received from the utility concerning their easement needs prior to requesting right of way plan approval. The district right of way manager must ensure proper documentation is received before an acquisition date (“A” date) is requested.
The following strategies can be utilized to obtain applicable permits and clearances for both the utilities and MoDOT during project development.
- If utility facilities are moving to a location within or immediately adjacent to MoDOT right of way, a utility may be invited to participate in permitting and environmental compliance activities.
- If utilities move to a location not within or adjacent to MoDOT right of way, the utility company would not normally be invited to participate in permit applications and environmental compliance activities. However, some unique projects may necessitate further attention and should be discussed with the Design Division’s technical support engineer. MoDOT will share information about resources to be avoided by the utility company as soon as possible.
If the utility is invited to and wants MoDOT to obtain joint permits and clearances, an agreement between the utility and MoDOT should be developed to include the following items:
- 1. List of permits and clearances needed by both MoDOT and the utility company,
- 2. List of the information needed for inclusion in the applications for permits and clearances, and
- 3. Schedule and deadlines for submittal of the information by the utility company (e.g., utility plans, fill quantities, construction methods, dates or seasons of construction).
Permits and clearances that may be needed by both a utility company and MoDOT include:
- Endangered Species Act consultation and clearance
- Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act clearance
- Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act clearance
- Sections 404 and Section 401 of the Clean Water Act permits
- State Operating Permit (erosion control)
- Recommendations on contaminated soil disposition.
6126.96.36.199 Service Lines Owned by Property Owners
When a proposed project requires utility company-owned facilities to be adjusted or relocated, the service lines may also require adjustment. The Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission will pay to adjust the property owner’s service lines located on existing right of way. While most utility companies reconnect the private service lines at no cost to the property owner, some do not. The cost to move and reconnect service lines, which lie on or in existing right of way is a noncompensable item. Property owners are to be advised of the possibility of incurring expense to reconnect these lines during the project public hearing and in the offer letter. The cost to the owner to reconnect these service lines cannot be included in the appraised compensation. For additional information see EPG 236.6 Appraisal and Appraisal Review.
For residents living within the boundaries of St. Louis County, the Commission will seek reimbursement from the St. Louis County Water Line Capital Improvement Program for adjustment of service lines supplying four (4) or fewer residential units (Section 66.405, RSMo 2000).
Adjustment of service lines owned by property owners is included in roadway contracts. Bid items for relocating service connections are provided for the different types of anticipated adjustments. A list of utility companies that do not own the service line from their main lines to the property owner is available. This list is subject to change and Design must be advised of additions or deletions to it as they become known.
6188.8.131.52 Notice of Hearing
When relocation or other difficulties with utility facilities on public right of way arise that prevent resolution by negotiation, formal hearings will be required.
The district initiates a request for a utility relocation hearing with a letter to the CCO (a copy is provided to the Design Division) requesting a hearing date. The CCO will arrange for a hearing room, court reporter, etc. and advise the district of the hearing date.
The district will prepare the notice of hearing by strictly following the given format and serve the notice on all persons and utility owners listed. The property and utility owner must be served only by personal service or by mailing a certified letter, return receipt requested, no later than 15 days before the date of hearing. This will require the district to make every effort to identify the correct property owner before preparing the notice of hearing. In order to avoid delays, every attempt will be made to issue the hearing notice at least 30 days prior to the hearing date in case any property has changed ownership and an additional property owner must be served. A notice of hearing on service line connections will also be served on the private or public owner of the main or distribution line to which the service lines are connected. A notarized "Report of Personal Service" will be completed when notification by certified mail is not used.
One copy of the hearing notice and attachments, "Report of Personal Service" and certified mail notices are to be submitted to the CCO after notification is complete.
Prior to the hearing, the district's representative will become familiar with the details of the utility adjustment in order to provide concise testimony to expedite the hearing process. The CCO will assign an attorney to work with the district and present the case.
Standard Utility Agreements have been approved by the CCO. They are identified in the upper left hand corner of each agreement such as CCO Form: UT1 (Master Reimbursable Utility Agreement). The CCO updates these agreements as necessary. They serve as a guide in the preparation of the agreement to be executed with the utility company for the adjustments required to their facilities to accommodate the proposed roadway improvement project. Be sure you use the up to date version before sending a copy to the company. A list of utility agreements is available. Detailed information concerning the sequence for preparing and executing a project agreement is available in EPG 235.2.3 Project Agreements. The DUE will encourage utility companies to use a Master Reimbursable Utility Agreement.
These forms are to be used word for word. Revisions or additions are only made to address specific project details. The intent of each paragraph must be retained, although specific words may be revised to fit the particular situation. No paragraphs are deleted without prior approval from CCO. Drafts of agreements having major revisions or complications are to be submitted, with supporting data, to Design for comment and approval.
A reference to Federal-Aid Policy Guide, (FAPG 23 CFR 645A) and the FHWA is included in all agreements. Utility companies must be acquainted with these requirements and procedures. The incorporation of FAPG 23 CFR 645A by reference in all agreements eliminates the need for a second set of regulations to be included in the document.
The agreement for the adjustment of a utility is prepared by the district and submitted to the company for execution. The agreement must be signed, sealed and notarized by the utility company. If they do not have or use a corporate seal, write "NO SEAL" under the signatures of the company’s officers.. The agreement is based on the company's plan and estimate of cost which was prepared in accordance with FAPG 23 CFR 645A. Exhibit "A" referred to in the agreement is the company's plan of adjustment. Exhibit "B" is the estimate of cost with supporting statements as prepared by the company. The company or municipal officials will execute a minimum of three copies of the agreement. All copies will be forwarded to the Chief Counsel’s Office for further handling. Agreements with cities are to be supported by city ordinance, a copy of which is to be submitted with the executed agreements. One fully executed copy of the agreement will be retained in Design’s files. The remaining fully executed agreements will be returned to the district after approval. A copy of the executed agreement will be provided to district construction personnel for use during the adjustment period. One copy will be provided to the owner of the utility.
Authorization to proceed with the adjustment of the utility is furnished to the owner once the fully executed agreement is returned to the district. The company's copy of the fully executed agreement, along with one copy of the plan and estimate of cost, will be transmitted to them by letter with specific instructions concerning "authorization to proceed". Utility relocation work can be authorized to begin as long as right of way or construction funds are shown in the current year of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program. If authorization has not been given, they will be advised that materials may be ordered but that no work is to be performed until they are given written notice to proceed. The company, for reasons of planning their workload or due to seasonal situations, may request early authorization to perform the work. This request, with the district's recommendations, is sent to the Design Division for advancement of the necessary funds, further handling and approval.
A utility only project, separate from the roadway improvement project, has distinct advantages when the following occurs:
- The utility work is extensive
- It must be performed in accordance with company's seasonal requirements
- It extends beyond the limits of the construction project
- It must be performed considerably in advance of the roadway contract
The length of the utility project will not exceed the limits of the right of way project. It may be necessary in these cases to have a second agreement with the company to cover work that must be performed concurrently with the roadway contract. These latter agreements will use the roadway construction job number. Early need for utility projects is to be determined at the time when the PATS form is revised each year. The utility construction funds will be shown in the year right of way funds are assigned. This will be done whenever possible to secure early adjustment to utility facilities. A request by the district is sent to the Planning Division. Estimated dollar amounts for utility adjustments are needed. These are estimates and do not need to be extremely accurate. When a special utility project is established, it is preferred, if at all possible, to include all the utility adjustments necessary for the entire roadway project. If funds are available, additional agreements can be added to this utility project until the final invoice for the first completed agreement is received for payment.
6184.108.40.206 Lump Sum Agreements
The use of a "lump sum" utility agreement is preferred. Use of this agreement eliminates the need for keeping detailed records of cost and the auditing of cost records. Estimates of cost must be prepared in detail for use of this agreement. When detailed estimates are not practical or costs appear unreasonable, "actual cost" agreements are to be used. The advantages of using a "lump sum" agreement will be discussed with the company that requests the use of "actual cost" agreement. Use of special forms of agreements, such as "subordination agreements", which are desired by certain companies, is acceptable. These, too, must be revised to cover the particular situation.
6220.127.116.11 Actual Cost Agreements
Actual cost agreements are acceptable when detailed estimates are not practical or costs appear to be questionable.
618.104.22.168 Master Reimbursable Utility Agreements
This is a generic agreement that addresses all future reimbursable utility relocations between a particular utility company and the Commission. Once a MRUA is executed, no other utility agreements are executed. All project specific items such as type of agreement (lump sum or actual cost), estimated total cost, and cost allocation is addressed in the letter from the DUE to the utility company.
622.214.171.124 Utility Agreement for Utility Work Included in Roadway Improvement Project
This agreement allows for final reimbursement for the adjustment to be based on actual cost. The roadway contractor will perform the utility work (either water or sewer). Records of quantities of each bid item are all that is maintained. If a substantial change is made in the original plan and extent of work, a change order having the utility company’s and MoDOT’s approval is needed.
6126.96.36.199 Advance Payments
Arrangements for making advance payments (before work commences) to utility companies are included in all agreements. If a company doesn’t want advance payments, or if the DUE determines it is in the best interest of MHTC, the company can be reimbursed after all the work is complete. The language in the agreement must be altered to reflect the payment method if it is in a form other than prepayment.
The utility company will submit a request for prepayment with an invoice prior to any advance payments. Route, county, and job number must be included in the request. The DUE will submit this request to the Controllers Office with copies sent to the Construction and Materials Division, district construction and the resident engineer.
The final bill for the completed adjustment of actual cost agreements must include a detailed statement of costs for all stages of construction.
6188.8.131.52 City or County Owned Utilities
When roadway improvements are within the corporate limits of cities, towns, and villages, a municipal agreement is negotiated between MHTC and the municipality. Likewise, when roadway improvements are within the limits of a county and outside the municipal limits, a county agreement must be negotiated between the MHTC and the county commission. Included in these agreements are provisions regarding reimbursement for adjusting city or county owned facilities. Normally reimbursement is provided for adjustment of city or county owned facilities that are now located on city or county streets and not on state highway right of way. Proper reference to the municipal or county agreement for authority for payment will be made in the utility agreement.
6184.108.40.206 Utility Plans
Plans for of utility adjustment are identified as "Exhibit A" to the agreement. The plans are prepared as previously discussed. They must contain sufficient details concerning location, elevation, compaction, clean up, etc. to provide for the proper adjustment of the utility. Use the “MHTC Contract Submittal Form” to submit three sets of the plans to CCO together with sufficient copies of the agreement.
When the plans are too bulky to attach to the agreement, an identification stamp (filled in completely except for the date), as shown below, is placed on the first sheet of the plans:
Part of Contract dated ____________________ Between Highways and Transportation Commission and ____________________ Route, ____________________, County, ____________________ Job No. ____________________ Sheet 1 of ____________________
Estimates of cost are identified as "Exhibit B" to the agreement.
District personnel negotiate with local utilities, cities and interstate pipeline companies to determine reimbursable costs of adjustments required to their facilities (EPG 643.3.10 Policy, Standards and Regulations, Allocation of Cost). These estimates are prepared in accordance with the provisions of FAPG 23 CFR 645A and any amendment thereto. These estimates must reflect the same procedures and costs used by the companies in their normal operations and must also accurately represent the expected costs of the work.
The utility's estimate will be reviewed to ensure compliance with FAPG 23 CFR 645A. One copy of the utility's estimate will be submitted to the Office of Audits and Investigations for pre-audit review and approval prior to preparation of the agreement. After approval, three copies of the estimate identified as "Exhibit B" will be submitted to the CCO with the agreement.
6220.127.116.11 Qualifying Statements
To supplement the agreement and support the costs set out in the estimate, the utility company must furnish statements concerning the scope of work, betterment, salvage credit, location of cost records, schedule, and additional costs that will add to an understanding of the work. These statements may involve use of bypasses, special equipment, need for larger facilities, etc. It is preferred that these statements be a part of the estimate of cost.
618.104.22.168 Scope of Work
This is a concise summary of the work to be performed. An example is "an estimate of cost covering the work of relocating Company's 12–inch Cushing-Woodriver pipe line to accommodate construction of Route 47 in Franklin County on Job No. J6P0172".
This means the upgrading of the facility being relocated, made solely for the benefit of and at the election of the utility and it is not attributable to the roadway improvement. Credit to MHTC is required for the additional costs incurred for the betterments introduced in the adjusted facility. Additional costs incurred by the utility required to comply with established governmental or industry codes are not considered betterments. However, in some of these cases the utility may realize a more capable or valuable facility. The company must furnish full details and documentation pertaining to the requirements of compliance with established codes that have resulted in the additional cost if an exception for betterment credit is requested. Reimbursement to the company for additional costs incurred due to adherence to these codes does not preclude the necessity of accrued depreciation credits as discussed in the next paragraph.
Following are some example statements concerning betterments:
- The proposed 16 in. size main is necessary to replace the function of the existing 10 in. size main because of additional length and bends. No significant increase in capacity is being achieved and there will be no service improvements; therefore, betterment credits are not being given.
- Comparative estimates have been prepared for prorating the cost of constructing a replacement-in-kind facility and the company deisired bettered facility.
- Attached is a copy of City Code Number xx that requires this company, in replacing any of its facilities used in fire protection, to install a minimum size main. No betterments are involved in this adjustment.
622.214.171.124 Accrued Depreciation Credit
Credit is required for the accrued depreciation of a utility’s facility that is being replaced. Examples are a building, structure, pumping station, filtration plant, power plant, substation, or other similar operational unit. Credit for accrued depreciation will not be required for a segment of the utility's service, distribution or transmission lines. It is also not required when the building, or structure is being moved as necessitated by the highway project. Acceptable accrued depreciation credit will be determined by use of the following formula:
6126.96.36.199 Removal and Salvage of Materials
This statement, to explain the salvage credit or lack of credit, will reflect routine company policy as well as the particular situation. For example:
- Existing facilities to be abandoned in place, since the cost of salvaging, based on our past experience, will exceed their value.
- Only those items will be salvaged for which salvage credit will exceed the cost of removal and salvage.
- Company liability requires removal of the retired facilities, even though the cost of removal will exceed allowable credit for salvage.
- Salvage credits are in accordance with established company accounting procedures.
6188.8.131.52 Cost Records
This statement concerns the location of the company's cost records. An example: "Company cost records will be available in our office at 2134 Industrial Avenue, Tulsa, Oklahoma".
The utility company will provide a work schedule to the DUE showing approximate start date and completion time.
Additional statements will explain or further clarify the work that is included.
6184.108.40.206 Material Costs
Quantities, description of the item, the unit cost, and the extended totals are shown. Percentage computations will be shown immediately following "total cost" so the company's and Commission's cost obligations are properly indicated. Unit assembly costs similar to those used by several of the rural electric association (R.E.A.) cooperatives are acceptable, provided the same units and charges are used in the company's regular operations. A handling charge conforming with the company's regular procedures may also be included.
6220.127.116.11 Labor Charges
Hours, individual or crew rates, and extended totals are shown. Payroll additives such as insurance, retirement, social security, vacation and other benefits are shown as a separate item under this heading in accordance with company's regular procedures. Adequate explanation must be given for total percentage used, especially in those cases where materials and labor are combined as unit costs or where labor percentages include additives and equipment requirements.
618.104.22.168 Overhead Costs
This charge is usually a percentage of the total labor cost. Rental equipment rates, in most cases, include this cost. This item must be in accordance with the company's established accounting procedures, which in some cases may include handling costs or be a percentage of the total cost of the work involved.
643.2.1 28 Equipment Charges
A description of the equipment to be used must be shown together with the number of hours to be charged. Rates charged for equipment usage must be justified by company's established accounting procedures. When the company does not have an established accounting procedure or a capitalization and depreciation schedule that is used in their own operations, the rates are to be established by the company subject to approval by MoDOT. These rates may be established by using rental rate publications as a guide. A reasonable amount will be deducted, when using rental rate schedules, for profit that the rental company realizes. A full explanation of the methods used in establishing the rates must also be submitted to support the company's request.
Equipment may be rented when company-owned equipment is not available or is inadequate, with the rental rate justified by appropriate solicitation of bids.
Unusual accounting procedures may be accepted with adequate prior explanations and approval of Design.
622.214.171.124 Removal Costs
These costs are estimated and shown in a similar method but separately from installation costs. When removal costs exceed salvage credits by more than the estimated cost of removal by the roadway contractor, an effort will be made to persuade the company to abandon the facilities in place. An exception is made when the utility company is required to remove abandoned facilities because of company liability, because of hazards, or by specific agreement with the Commission. Abandoned facilities can be included with the miscellaneous removals in the roadway contract. It may be possible for the company to remove those portions of the facility for which credits will exceed removal costs, with the remainder of the facility to be abandoned for removal in the roadway contract. Materials removed must be itemized, with the company's customary salvage credit given. Items to be scrapped or junked will be indicated. Whenever a facility or portion thereof is shown to be abandoned on the plans, a letter from the company to that effect must be on file in the district's project records. This eliminates ownership problems if these facilities are removed or salvaged by the roadway contractor.
When the utility facility is no longer needed and removal is necessary to accommodate the roadway project, the removal of the item may be handled either as a right of way item or an utility adjustment. When handled as a right of way item, the damages allowed are to equal the depreciated value of the facility, with the necessary removals being accomplished by the roadway contractor. If accomplished as a utility adjustment, the MHTC, by utility agreement, will reimburse the company for removal costs and receive salvage credit for the material removed, up to but not exceeding removal costs. Normally, the cost of removal of service lines is not reimbursable, because in most cases the utility company does not hold a written easement that establishes a compensable interest in these areas.
6126.96.36.199 Engineering Costs
Costs of engineering, whether preliminary or construction, must be shown as a separate item and are not to be included with "labor costs". Concurrent cost accounting procedures of the FHWA and MoDOT make this a necessity.
6188.8.131.52 Prorating Costs
The need for prorating utility adjustment costs occurs when the adjustment involves work to be paid for by the MHTC and work to be done at the expense of the utility. Generally the two following conditions require this division of cost:
- The existing facility occupies both public and private right of way.
- Betterments are included in the necessary replacement facility.
Normally, the procedure for prorating costs for facilities located partly on the public and partly on private right of way is based on the individual lengths affected on public and private right of way. When confronted with pole lines, a count of existing poles affected by the roadway construction on and off public right of way, can be used in lieu of the length of facility. When the existing length or pole count methods are unsuitable to meet conditions, a variation in prorating procedures may be negotiated between the company and the MHTC.
When the adjustment involves betterments, the percentage determination is normally calculated by the fractional results of comparative estimates; one estimate reflecting the cost of the replacement-in-kind facility and the other being an estimate of the bettered facilities.
The following are examples of methods of determining pro rata costs:
- Pole line partly on and partly off public right of way. Ninety-five poles are to be adjusted, with 25 being located on public property. 25/95 = 0.26 or 26% company cost; therefore, 74% is MHTC cost.
- Pipeline adjustment. 585 ft. of pipeline to be adjusted, with 66 ft. located on public right of way. 66/585 = 0.11 or 11% company cost; therefore, 89% MHTC cost.
- Pro rata cost due to betterments. Cost of replacement-in-kind facility, $10,000. Cost of utility- selected facility, $20,000. MHTC's obligation, 50%.
6184.108.40.206 Lump Sum Estimates
The cost estimate that supports the lump sum agreement must be accurate, comprehensive, verifiable and in sufficient detail to present a clear picture of the work involved and the cost of the individual items. The estimate may cover only that portion of the adjustment to the existing facility that is located on private right of way for which the Commission is obligated to reimburse the utility.
A final audit of the costs for an adjustment is not required for reimbursement of lump sum contracts. The utility's final invoice is submitted for payment after district personnel receive certification that the work was completed in accordance with the approved plan.
Lump sum estimates are limited to a maximum of $100,000 of Commission obligation; however, exceptions may be made for special situations that have prior approval from Design. These exceptions usually cover major relocations for which the Commission's proportionate obligation is extremely small. All lump sum estimates exceeding $50,000 must be submitted to the Audits & Investigations Unit (AI) for review.
An example of a lump sum estimate is available.
6220.127.116.11 Actual Cost Estimates
These estimates are prepared in sufficient detail to determine the reasonable expected cost of the work. Reimbursement is based on the actual costs with a final audit of the company's cost records eliminating the need for every nut and bolt to be shown in the estimate. The total adjustment to be performed must usually be detailed in these estimates even though the existing facility is "partly" on private right of way. Normally, the work to accomplish utility adjustments cannot be separated so that cost records will reflect actual costs of work on private right of way from work on public right of way. By establishing a percentage obligation, there is no time lost or unnecessary recording costs and operations. A pre-negotiation review is required for actual cost estimates greater than $100,000; however, a review can be performed on an actual cost estimate of any size if MoDOT has limited experience with the utility company. An example of an actual cost estimate is available.
Detailed records of materials, labor and equipment are maintained by project office personnel during construction if the utility relocation is performed by the utility company’s own forces. If bids are taken for adjustment of the utility using bid items with unit prices, then records of quantities of each bid item used is all that is maintained. If a utility company’s ongoing contractor performs the relocation, records will be maintained that are consistent with the method of pay in the ongoing contract.
If the utility company utilizes a private engineering consulting firm, whose work will be reimbursed with state funds, a review of the consultant agreement will be performed.
A checklist is available for reviewing consultant-engineering contracts to ensure the contract conforms to MoDOT policy and complies with applicable federal regulations.
AI has established the following requirements to ensure compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations:
All consultant contracts totaling $100,000 or more must be submitted to AI prior to contract approval.
If a consultant contract is less than $100,000, a pre-negotiation review may be required if
- The department has no previous experience with the company and there is insufficient knowledge of the consultant’s accounting system
- There is previous unfavorable experience regarding the reliability of the consultant’s accounting system
- The contract involves procurement of new equipment or supplies for which cost experience is lacking.
618.104.22.168 Confidentially and Payment
Pre-negotiation memorandums and related documentation prepared by AI are considered confidential documents and must not be disseminated outside MoDOT without the express approval of AI.
The Controller’s Office will not pay a utility invoice unless a pre-negotiation review has been performed, as required.
Cost Estimates must indicate the following:
- Lump Sum or Actual Cost
- MHTC’s percent obligation of the total cost.
- If the utility company plans to upgrade their facilities, the difference in cost must be depicted in the cost estimate and the difference in cost will be borne by the utility company.
- The cost estimate must include the total cost of the utility adjustment (reimbursable and non-reimbursable). If partly reimbursable, the entire cost must be shown with a percent obligation.
622.214.171.124 Lightcore, a Centurytel Company, Agreement
LightCore and MHTC have entered into a partnership agreement, “Amended and Restated Fiber Optic Cable on Freeway in Missouri,” executed June 5, 2002. Special utility rules apply to LightCore in accordance with this agreement on designated routes.
6126.96.36.199 Performance of the Work
Generally the utility will perform the work with its own personnel and equipment. Most telephone companies don't have enough staff to do this, so they contract the work to others. When the utility is not adequately staffed or equipped to do so, and all or part of the cost of the work is reimbursable, the work may be done by contract using the following procedures:
- The utility will advise the district in writing of their need to contract all or a portion of the work because they are not staffed or equipped to do so themselves. The district will advise the utility to proceed with the solicitation of bids, but they will not be permitted to award the contract without concurrence of the DUE.
- The utility will develop and document a list of bidders (minimum of 3) whom they believe can do the work. Cities and some other utilities such as water districts may be required to advertise for the work. This procedure is satisfactory.
- The utility will furnish the district a tabulation of bids received, two (2) copies of the proposal used in securing the bids, and any other information to support their recommendation for award to the lowest qualified bidder.
- The district will review and approve the utility's bid information prior to the award of the contract. The Design Division is available to assist the district with review of bid information if necessary.
- The utility may wish to utilize a contractor they have retained for their on-going work (a continuing contract). If so, the utility will submit a copy of this contract to the district. The district will review the contract for reasonableness of cost and submit it to AI. As long as the contract is still in effect, AI will only approve the original submittal.
Low cost incidental work such as tree trimming and sidewalk replacement may be performed by contract without competitive bidding provided the district considers the cost to be reasonable.
Adjustments of utility facilities must be closely coordinated with the roadway contract work. When it is to the Commission's advantage, the adjustment of utility facilities may be included in the roadway contract. Such work may include water and sewer facilities. Generally, this is used when the cost of the work is to be borne mostly or entirely by the Commission. Plan ahead to get this work in the roadway contract. Guidelines for including utility work in the roadway contract plans are available.
Frequently it will be expedient and/or economical to adjust critical, large, or seasonal utility facilities well in advance of the roadway improvement contract. The district office is encouraged to program utility adjustments prior to the anticipated year of construction of the project. Usually, the utility project is programmed in the year right of way is authorized.
6188.8.131.52 Utility Permit Application Provisions for Work on MHTC Right of Way
When an applicant for a utility permit desires to work on the right of way of an interstate and other limited access roadway, they must agree, if permission is granted, to install, maintain, and service their facilities without entering or leaving the through traffic roadway and the interchange ramps except at points provided specifically for that purpose. In addition, they agree to not park any equipment or store any materials on the median, the through roadway, the shoulders and the ramps of the facility. A temporary support pole to facilitate an aerial crossing may be placed in the median of the facility provided it is stipulated on the face of the permit application and adequate flaggers or law enforcement officers are utilized to protect the traveling public while the support pole is in place. Support poles will not be permitted within 30 foot of the edge of the travelway. The support poles must be removed from the facility within one week unless otherwise specifically permitted by the district engineer.
6184.108.40.206 Location of Parallel Utility Facilities
The permit applicant is expected to determine the location of the Commission's right of way from Commission's plans. Upon written request and adequate advance notice, the Commission will re-establish missing right of way markers. This will be accomplished on a permit-by-permit basis and then only if Commission has adequate personnel available.
Any right of way markers damaged, disturbed, or destroyed during permit operations will be re-established by a registered land surveyor at the permit applicant’s expense.
The permit applicant will be responsible for staking between highway right of way markers as needed to assure accurate and uniform installation of the parallel facilities in the utility corridor.
The permit applicant will provide adequate protection and marking of their underground facilities as follows:
- Fiber optic cable crossings are to be encased in steel pipe or other approved encasement material in accordance with the utility policy from utility corridor to utility corridor. Variations due to encountering rock will be determined in the field by the district engineer.
- Warning signs will be installed at the right of way lines at road crossings (all underground utilities).
- For parallel underground facilities, warning signs will be installed and maintained at the right of way lines showing the offset location of the utility when the utility is permitted to locate beyond the normal six foot wide utility corridor.
The permit applicant will construct the utility facility in such a manner that it may be accurately located both horizontally and vertically after installation. A detectable tape or trace wire will be installed with non-metallic buried facilities. Wherever feasible the metallic tracer line will be a part of the utility facility. Acceptable alternatives will be considered for approval.
All voids resulting from boring casing or other facilities under the roadway or approaches will be filled to the satisfaction of the district engineer. The district engineer must approve the method and materials.
Manhole covers will be installed as flush as possible with the finished ground line so maintenance vehicles and equipment may operate over them.
The permit applicant will protect highway plant materials, including trees and shrubs. These items including turf disturbed by the applicant’s work will be restored as directed by the district engineer. Trees and shrubs will not be trimmed, cut, moved or sprayed without specific permission from the district engineer.
6220.127.116.11 Roadway Plans and Job Special Provisions
A legend showing all applicable utility symbols and the names of the utility companies is shown on the first special utility sheet. In the absence of special utility sheets, this information may be shown on the title sheet or the first plan and profile sheet. The Job Special Provisions will include the name, address and telephone number of all utilities located on the project. The anticipated relocation completion date of each utility is also to be shown based on written dates, duration, or completion dates from the utility. This information will inform the bidder of the status of utilities for proper work coordination that could affect the bids for the proposed improvement. Status notations will include general notations such as: “N/A”, “Work is in progress”, “Work has not started”, “Work is complete”, and “Work is included in contract.
The following note is required to be placed on the title sheet or the first plan and profile sheet and the first special utility sheet (if used) to inform contractors of the suitability of the utility information contained on the plans.
- "The existence and approximate location of utility facilities known to exist, as shown on the plans, are based on the best information available to the Commission at this time. This information is provided by the Commission "as-is" and the Commission expressly disclaims any representation or warranty as to the completeness, accuracy, or suitability of the information for any use. Reliance upon this information is done at the risk and peril of the user, and the Commission shall not be liable for any damages that may arise from any error in the information".
618.104.22.168 Changes in Approval Work
When changes are necessary to previously approved utility work the following information will be considered.
ACTUAL COST UTILITY AGREEMENT
- A utility change order is required when a substantial change is made to the original utility relocation plan. If uncertain the change in work is substantial, write a change order.
- Slight modifications in quantities do not substantiate a change order.
- The addition of minor items not included in the approve estimate does not substantiate a change order.
- A change order is needed if there is a change in the percentage of cost that is the Commission’s obligation. (i.e., agreement indicates 50% obligation of Commission, additional work is to be 100% obligation of Commission, this must be documented on change order)
LUMP SUM UTILITY AGREEMENT · Any change in the original scope of a utility relocation requires a change order. · Normal overruns are not considered as changes in approved work and will not be reimbursed. · Underestimating materials, labor or equipment is not considered a change in approved work and will not be reimbursed.
UTILITY AGREEMENT FOR WORK INCLUDED IN ROAD PROJECT · Handle changes in utility work the same as changes in roadwork. · Change orders for utility work will be accomplished through the roadway contractor. These change orders require the utility company’s signature.
622.214.171.124 Final Invoice for Utility Work
Utility Companies are required to submit a final invoice to MoDOT for all actual cost reimbursable utility work and for any lump sum reimbursable utility work that was not prepaid. After the utility work has been fully completed, the resident engineer (RE) should send the utility company a “60 Day” Final Acceptance Letter requesting a complete final invoice within 60 days, as detailed in the utility agreement. If the final invoice is not received from the utility company within 30 days, then the RE should send a follow-up letter (i.e., “30 Day” Reminder Final Invoice Letter) reminding the utility of its obligation to submit a final invoice within 60 days of the completed work. If the RE does not receive a final invoice from the utility company within this timeframe, then the RE should contact the district utility engineer (DUE) for guidance on how to close out the work.
The RE office is expected to check the final bill within two weeks after receipt in as much detail as possible. It is their responsibility to verify from field records the quantities of labor, equipment, material used, material retired, and to justify all changes made. They should also note all subcontractors working for the utility company and the subcontractor approval authorization dates given by the DUE. If the utility’s contractor made the adjustment at unit cost prices, then it is the RE’s responsibility to verify the number of units completed and not the hours of labor and equipment. It is also important for the utility to show the words “final bill” or “final invoice” on the last bill, in order for MoDOT to understand which bill is the last and final. The order of items in the final statement will follow as closely as possible the order of items in the original estimate. A summary, on the utility company's letterhead, of the total cost of preliminary engineering, construction engineering, right of way, labor, overhead, construction travel expense, transportation, equipment, materials, supply, handling, and salvage credits should be shown in a way that will permit direct comparison with the approved estimate.
The final bill must show a general description of the utility adjustment, the highway project number, the date on which work was completed or last item of billed expense was incurred, and the location where records can be audited. The RE is not expected to verify such items as overhead expenses, preliminary engineering, equipment rate, labor rate, etc. If the utility is using computerized billing procedures, it may be difficult to compare all the items in the final invoice to the original detailed estimate. The RE should note any questionable items in the final bill in the transmittal memo to the DUE.
After the RE office checks the final invoice and determines the utility has been overpaid, then the utility company will need to send MoDOT a check for the overpayment amount. The check should be drafted to “Director of Revenue-Credit Road Fund”. If the utility company did not send MoDOT an overpayment check with the final invoice then the RE should send a letter to the utility company requesting the over-payment check.
After the RE office review of the final invoice is complete, the RE should complete a Form C-13, Final Utility Report. A copy of this report must be submitted with the final bill for all reimbursable utility adjustments. This form shows the minimum information required by the RE. The requested numbers shown on line 10 (Commission Estimated Cost) and line 11 (Amount of Final Bill) in the report are Commission obligation totals. If the final invoice varies considerably from the original estimate, the reason should be documented on the attachments of the Final Utility Report. Any intermediate payments should also be noted on the Final Utility Report. This additional information might be helpful to the MoDOT auditor.
The utility diary book or the Daily Utility Report, Form C-9, is to be submitted with the final utility report for all actual cost adjustments, but not for lump sum adjustments. All utility work (actual cost and lump sum) needs to be closed out by the RE office. One copy of the Final Utility Report, utility diary, field book or Daily Utility Reports, and the district engineer’s recommendation should accompany the final invoices.
The RE’s memo should note any overpayments requested and if payment was received. This cover memo should be sent to the DUE and should include the project number, route, county, actual cost or lump sum utility agreement, Commission obligation (%), total, cost estimate of Commission obligation and recommendation of payment or amount of overpayment received. The DUE will review the final paper work for accuracy and completion, if acceptable, and within 30 days of receipt, sign the Final Utility Report and forward the RE memo and attachments to the Construction and Materials Division with a copy for the district construction office.
The Commission may be obligated for construction costs to connect power or phone service to MoDOT facilities. District design works with utility companies to account for this work. These reimbursable costs may include the following items: power to traffic signals, lighting facilities, ITS, cathodic protection or phone service to controllers among other MoDOT facilities. The RE is responsible for submission of these costs for payment directly to the Controllers Office. The memo should include the bill and a transmittal letter approving the cost. A copy of this memo should also be sent to the DUE, the district construction office and the district traffic office.
6126.96.36.199 Appropriate Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) on Utility Mapping
SUE may be used on any project. Adjustment cost savings, whether to MHTC or the utility, are beneficial to the taxpayer. Good SUE projects are typically urban in nature, or in congested areas, where the project footprint is to be minimized or anytime accurate vertical and horizontal location of the facility might allow a design to avoid the facility thus preventing the need for the adjustment.
643.2.2 Construction Inspection Guidelines for Utilities
This information is a guide for resident engineers (RE’s) and inspectors. It describes their job duties concerning non-reimbursable and reimbursable utility work located within the limits of a roadway or bridge improvement project.
6188.8.131.52 Relocation Of Utility Facilities
Improvements to the highway system often require negotiation between the district utilities engineer (DUE) and a city, publicly, or privately owned utility company for utility easements, cost estimates, and adjustments of their facilities located within the limits of the proposed highway improvements. Utility adjustments for road improvement projects fall into two categories: non-reimbursable and reimbursable adjustments.
6184.108.40.206.1 Non-Reimbursable and Reimbursable Adjustments
If a utility facility is in conflict with the proposed roadway improvement, and is located on public right of way without prior land rights, the Commission is not obligated to reimburse the utility company for the adjustment costs. This is referred to as a "non-reimbursable adjustment". The utility company is obligated to obtain a utility permit to perform the required adjustment, with a copy to be forwarded to the RE office. The RE/inspector should make an effort to track the progress of the utility for compliance with the schedule indicated in the permit and contract special provisions. They should also make sure the placement of the relocated utility is in the location and depth indicated on the plans, and that it does not conflict with any proposed construction. Reimbursement for utility adjustments will be made to the utility company for those portions of their facilities that are located on private easements. The utility company is obligated to obtain a utility permit to perform any relocation work on state highway right of way. A copy of the agreement and permit is forwarded by the DUE to the RE office. There are three examples when a utility company may be reimbursed for relocating their facilities originally located on public right of way and they are as follows:
- LightCore: LightCore (formerly DTI) is a fiber optic company that has a partnership agreement with the commission. The partnership agreement provides the commission ownership of several fiber optic lines in the cable for highway transportation purposes. The DUE keeps a copy of the partnership agreement and all supplemental agreements with LightCore.
- Adjustment of city-owned utility facilities originally located on city streets is reimbursable by the Commission.
- Utility services to Commission maintained facilities: Utility facilities that require adjustment in order to provide service to Commission facilities are reimbursable by the Commission. Examples include: power to traffic signals, lighting, ITS, cathodic protection and phone drops to traffic signal controllers or other Commission facilities.
6220.127.116.11.2 Agreement Types
Whenever the Commission is obligated for the reimbursement of utility adjustments, an agreement shall be executed between the utility company and the Commission. All agreements shall include a plan (Exhibit “A”) and cost estimate (Exhibit “B”) in the agreement. These agreements are divided into two types:
- Standard Agreements and
- Master Reimbursable Utility Agreements (MRUA)
Detailed information concerning the sequence for preparing and executing a project agreement is available in EPG 235.2.3 Project Agreements.
Standard Utility Agreements are agreements executed by the utility company and the Commission covering reimbursable utility adjustments for a certain project. Standard agreements are generally used when dealing with a utility company that rarely deals with the Commission. Once the Commission executes the standard agreement, Design Division personnel will forward a copy to the Construction Division, Controller’s Office and to the DUE. The DUE will forward a copy of the executed standard agreement to the district construction office and the RE office. A Master Reimbursable Utility Agreement (MRUA) is a statewide agreement that has been previously executed by the utility company and the Commission for all future reimbursable utility adjustments between both parties. The DUE encourages the utility companies to enter into a MRUA with the Commission to reduce potential future delays in executing a standard agreement. When the reimbursable adjustment will utilize a MRUA, the DUE will prepare a correspondence letter referencing the executed MRUA; which will serve as the agreement for the construction utility file. Copies of all MRUA correspondence letters are forwarded by the DUE to the RE, the district construction office, the Division of Construction & Materials and the Controller’s Office.
618.104.22.168.3 Types of Cost Estimates for Agreements
Agreements (Standard and MRUA) are divided again into two categories:
- Actual Cost and
- Lump Sum.
The DUE will work with the utility companies to determine the best type of agreement to use.
Actual Cost Agreements can be used for any dollar amount of reimbursement. The level of inspection records for actual cost agreement work is more stringent than the lump sum type of agreements. (See EPG 622.214.171.124 Field Inspection and EPG 6126.96.36.199 Maintaining Construction Records).
Lump Sum Agreements can only be used for reimbursable agreements less than $100,000 or in special circumstances. (See EPG 6188.8.131.52 Field Inspection and EPG 6184.108.40.206 Maintaining Construction Records).
6220.127.116.11 Preconstruction Meetings
Preconstruction meetings fall into three categories relating to utilities.
- No utility adjustments are anticipated within the project limits.
- Utility work completed prior to the preconstruction meeting, and
- Utility work not completed prior to the preconstruction meeting.
The contractor is responsible for having utilities located by contacting Missouri-One-Call (800 DIG RITE) prior to any excavation on the project. A reminder of this responsibility should be made at the preconstruction conference. Since MHTC/MoDOT is not a member of Missouri One Call, the contractor must also submit a MoDOT Notice of Intent to Perform Work Form to verify there are no conflicts with MoDOT facilities in the projects limits. The contractor can also fax the MoDOT Notice of Intent to Perform Work Form directly to a MoDOT district customer service representative.
618.104.22.168.1 No Utility Adjustments Being Anticipated Within the Project Limits
The RE should invite the representatives of the utility companies listed in the job special provision to all preconstruction meetings. The DUE should also be invited to all preconstruction meetings.
622.214.171.124.2 Utility Work Completed Prior to the Preconstruction Meeting
The inspector should review all reimbursable utility adjustment agreements prior to any work commencing (See EPG 6126.96.36.199 Field Inspection). Good communication between the inspector and the DUE is important to understand all expectations between both parties. All utility work on MoDOT right of way is to be performed with a MoDOT utility permit excluding work included in the road contract. RE offices must have copies of all permits and utility agreements. DUE’s and RE’s should also encourage all work to be started soon after the notice to proceed being issued by the DUE. Random checks by the inspector to verify depth and location of proposed utility facilities at critical locations (proposed drainages, signal bases, etc.) can reduce issues with the roadway contractor. The RE should invite the representatives of the utilities companies listed in the job special provision and the DUE to the preconstruction meeting. At the meeting a general discussion should highlight the adjustments made by the utility and what abandoned facilities the contractor may encounter.
6188.8.131.52.3 Utility Work Not Completed Prior to the Preconstruction Meeting
It is important for the RE/Inspector to understand the utility companies work schedule and how it relates to the contractors work schedule. During the preconstruction meeting, the schedule of the utility and contractor should be discussed and conflicts should be addressed to allow utility and highway work to progress as near to the proposed schedule as possible. When the utility work will not be completed soon after the preconstruction meeting, the RE should meet with the roadway contractor and the utility representatives on a regular basis to discuss utility coordination issues, so expectations from all parties are known and conveyed clearly. Utility companies may need some work performed by the MoDOT or the roadway contractor prior to completing their adjustments. (Examples include: survey staking of right of way or proposed facilities, trees cleared, grading performed.). When coordination meetings are necessary, they are typically scheduled for a common day/time each week or bi-weekly until all parties can work without delay. The DUE should be invited to utility coordination meetings. On large-scale projects that have many utility issues to address prior to the roadway contractor commencing work, it may be necessary to have a separate preconstruction meeting with utility company personnel.
6184.108.40.206 Authorization To Proceed
Once a final agreement has been executed, and right of way clearance has been issued, the DUE will issue a notice to proceed to the utility (see Example 1 and Example 2). A copy of the notice will be forwarded to the RE along with the agreement, plans, and estimate for the proposed work if that had not been provided previously. If a utility starts their relocation prior to the authorization to proceed, the RE should notify them immediately in writing that reimbursement will not be made for the cost of work done before proper authorization. In addition to the notice to proceed, the RE should also have a copy of the utility permit from the traffic specialists for any work on highway right of way. The above authorizations to proceed are not to be confused with Sec 105.7 of the Standard Specifications that refers to utilities, originally on public right of way, which may require relocation without reimbursement.
6220.127.116.11 Utility Contract And Equipment Rental Procedures
When actual cost is to be used as the basis for reimbursement, the adjustment is sometimes made by the utility with company personnel and equipment. It is the RE’s/inspector’s responsibility to be certain that all actual cost adjustments are made in compliance with all requirements of the agreement. The RE/inspector should check for compliance not only at the beginning of the adjustment but also at periodic intervals. If reimbursable utility work goes to the construction phase and the utility company does not have adequate staff available to perform the adjustment and plans to let a contract for the adjustment, a definite procedure is required. The necessary information must be sent to the DUE, if it is furnished before authorization for the utility to proceed. The DUE shall review/approve all subcontract work involving actual utility agreements prior to the subcontractor commencing work. Subcontractor approval is not required for lump sum agreement work. The utility company must furnish a letter in which they state that they are "not staffed or equipped to perform the work and intend to contract for . . ." unless this is already stated in the agreement. For actual cost reimbursable agreements, the utility company should solicit a minimum of three bids for work that is to be contracted. For lump sum reimbursable agreements, approval of contract work is not required. At the stage where data is required to be submitted to the DUE, two copies of the bid proposal and of a tabulation of bids are to be submitted. Approval by the DUE is required before any contract is awarded or any work is done. After award, one executed copy of the contract is to be sent by the DUE to the district construction office and the RE office. It is preferred that bids be taken on a unit price basis although "lump sum" bids are acceptable. In lump sum bids, unit prices for the major items must be included in the bid to permit adjustment for substantial changes in plan or extent of work. When existing "continuing contracts" are to be used, the RE/inspector should contact the DUE to determine if the continuing contract has been approved and the rates to be used are current. Continuing contracts are typically used for minor incidental work that includes: asphalt, concrete work, seeding/sodding, and tree trimming. It is vital that inspectors closely monitor the start of each reimbursable utility adjustment. If any actual cost reimbursable utility work is being performed by unapproved contractors, the RE/Inspector should contact the DUE immediately. The RE should also immediately advise the utility company in the field to stop working. The RE should also advise the utility company in writing that the costs are not eligible for reimbursement under provisions of the agreement. The DUE can take appropriate steps to approve the subcontract work and advice the RE when the utility company can proceed to work. When a utility must rent, or contract for, any equipment, a minimum of three quotations to establish the rental rate should be solicited. The RE neither approves nor disapproves these quotations, but should be sure that bids were solicited. If they were not, the RE should advise the utility in writing that reimbursement for equipment charges may be withheld for non-compliance with these requirements. Proof of solicitation and copies of quotations should be kept on file by the RE for audit purposes. If a specific size or type of equipment is needed for which only one bid is economically available, the utility must provide documentation to verify this. If three bids are solicited on the reasonable assumption that they are available but less than three are received, prior approval of those received is not required.
When emergency or breakdown situations occur, prior approval by the DUE is not required for contract or equipment rental work unless the cost or period of time will be extensive. The utility company should furnish a letter as soon as possible to explain the situation and set out the estimated costs involved. The RE’s records should substantiate the need and the charges for personnel and equipment.
618.104.22.168 Field Inspection
The degree of inspection needed for utility construction will vary considerably with the nature and location of the work. Judgment must be used regarding the manner and regularity of inspection duties. Some phases of the work require a very close check to insure that the highway will not be adversely affected and to insure satisfactory performance of work in accordance with the agreement and plans. The degree of inspection may vary from spot checking of overhead installations to continuous close observation of backfilling trenches beneath proposed pavement, embankment area, or adjacent to bridge abutments. The inspector must be alert and attentive to assure that operations procede in an orderly and economical manner. Lack of coordination and attention is indicated when a utility improperly does its work, resulting in additional charges for removal and reconstruction in the proper manner. A partial checklist that can help construction personnel in their inspection duties follows:
- Read the agreement. Study the estimate and plan. Become completely familiar with the work involved in the adjustment.
- Check whether authority to proceed has been given. If it has, a weekly report should be completed on "Working Day" projects. If the project is not anticipated for several weeks, a note may be placed on the report advising that further reports will not be submitted until the work is started. The weekly reports may be combined with a regular construction project if the utility adjustment and project are active at the same time.
- On "Completion Date" projects weekly reports are not tracked in SiteManager. Therefore, daily records of utility work progress should be tracked in the Daily Work Reports (DWR’s) and the inspector/RE should note any days in the week that the roadway contractor was delayed due to utility work. Copies of the DWR’s should be sent to the roadway contractor. The RE should contact the DUE after utility work delays the roadway contractor’s major operation more than one week. (See EPG 622.214.171.124 Maintaining Construction Records).
- Check with utility personnel to be sure they are familiar with nomenclature and symbols furnished on alignment and grade stakes along project.
- Check whether the utility is doing work with its own forces or by contract having Department approval.
- MoDOT performs most of the survey staking for utility companies but some utility companies perform their own surveying staking. Therefore, check to be sure both the Department and the utility use the same reference datum in setting benchmarks, grade, stakes, etc.
- Check proposed underground utilities to avoid conflict of elevations with highway installations and check to be sure the utilities are installed at the correct elevation.
- Check vertical clearance of overhead utility installations. The RE's responsibility for minimum clearance is limited to a check for physical conflict with signs, light standards, etc., and to a check for clearance above plan or revised plan grade line. For utilities crossing over travelways, the minimum vertical clearance shall be not less than required by the National Electric Safety Code and in no case less than 18 feet as required by Commission Policy.
- See that at least minimum horizontal clearances are obtained between utility structures and highway or railroad facilities.
- Check placement of poles, towers, and similar above ground facilities to assure that established policies are observed.
- See that encasement of underground lines such as water lines and petroleum product lines are in accordance with the plans. Verify that plans comply with policy (Utility Vertical Depth/Encasement Requirements on MoDOT R/W). See that underground lines are not placed on unsuitable foundation material requiring costly removal and reconstruction operations.
- Require that manhole grades be accurately correlated with proposed highway construction.
- Require all utility excavation areas that might have a critical influence upon highway construction to be backfilled in accordance with requirements established by the agreement.
- Observe and record the condition of retired materials to assure that proper classification and disposal is made. Inspection of recovered material on actual cost agreements is the responsibility of the RE when notified by the utility company that such material is available for inspection. Inform the utility that it is the company's responsibility to inform the Department of the time and place recovered material will be available for inspection. Do this in the district's letter authorizing work to proceed. The RE, accompanied by a representative of the utility, should examine this material. It is not the RE's responsibility to place a dollar value on recovered material. The utility company may be held accountable for full value of materials disposed of without proper notice
- All such utility adjustment work, whether by permit or by agreement, is to be inspected by the district and the location of proposed utility facilities to be placed on the final plans of the project. Records should be maintained as noted in EPG 6126.96.36.199 Maintaining Construction Records.
- After the utility adjustment is completed, the RE should send a "60 Day" Final Acceptance Letter to the utility company for all work that MoDOT has not received a final invoice. The "60 Day" letter advises the utility company to send the final bill within 60 days of completing the work. If the RE has not received the final bill 30 days after the work has been completed, then the RE should send a reminder letter to the utility company called a "30 Day" Reminder Final Invoice Letter. If the RE has not received a final bill from the utility company after 60 days of completing the work, the RE should contact the DUE to seek guidance on how to proceed with closing out the work. (See EPG 6188.8.131.52.3 Final Invoice).
6184.108.40.206 Changes In Approved Utility Work
Change may occur when utility work is included in the road contract or when utility work is not included in the road contract. Generally, most utility work is not included in the road contract.
6220.127.116.11.1 Changes in Approved Utility Work Not Included in the Road Contract
The RE/inspector should be aware of two cases that involve changes to reimbursable utility work:
- If it is discovered that there is reimbursable work on a project and no agreements were previously set-up for the work.
- When a substantial change deviates from the original scope of work outlined in the original agreement.
(Case #1) Consult the District Utility Section regarding preparation of the agreement. The DUE will then prepare the necessary agreement for the utility work to commence.
(Case #2) A "utility" change order is essential any time a necessary revision of an actual cost adjustment will exceed the original scope of work covered by the agreement and plans, or when the adjustment within the original boundaries must be changed to a substantial degree. Slight modifications in quantities or addition of minor items not included in the approved estimate but necessary to accomplish the intent of the approved agreement are not normally considered a substantial change. If doubt exists, contact the DUE to determine if a utility change order should be prepared and submitted. If there will be any change in the percentage of cost which is the Commission's obligation, a supplemental agreement in the form of a change order is required. Intermediate partial payments for which the initial agreement made no provision cannot be made unless authorized by an approved utility change order. All modifications must meet established Commission policy. Check with the DUE to assure there will be no conflict with the present agreement or future installations. There are two cases when it is not necessary to prepare a utility change order to justify added utility work.
(Case #2A) A "utility" change order is essential any time a necessary revision of an actual cost adjustment will exceed the original scope of work covered by the agreement and plans, or when the adjustment within the original boundaries must be changed to a substantial degree. Slight modifications in quantities or addition of minor items not included in the approved estimate but necessary to accomplish the intent of the approved agreement are not normally considered a substantial change. The RE is not required to prepare a utility change order for a scope change if the total cost of original work cost does not increase more than 15%. If doubt exists, contact the DUE to deter-mine if a utility change order should be prepared and submitted. If there will be any change in the percentage of cost which is the Commission's obligation, a supplemental agreement in the form of a change order is required. Intermediate partial payments for which the initial agreement made no provision cannot be made unless authorized by an approved utility change order. All modifications must meet established Commission policy. The RE should check with the DUE to assure there will be no conflict with the present agreement or future installations.
(Case #2A-Supplemental Work – Original Agreement was a Master Reimbursable Utility Agreement – MRUA) If the original utility work was performed under terms of a MRUA and the scope of work changes to increase the cost of the original work substantially (exceed 15%), then the DUE should prepare a supplemental correspondence MRUA letter to the Utility Company approving the additional work. The RE should contact the DUE immediately when this situation occurs, so the DUE can prepare the necessary paperwork in order for the utility company to proceed performing the additional work.
(Case #2B-Supplemental Work – Original Agreement was a Standard Agreement and Utility Company needs to perform additional work prior to the road project being let) If the original work was performed under terms of a standard agreement and the scope change work needs to commence prior to the roadway contract being let, then a supplemental agreement should be prepared by the DUE to approve the additional costs associated with the scope change because utility change orders can not be prepared until after a project is let. The RE should contact the DUE immediately when this situation occurs, so the DUE can prepare the supplemental agreement in order for the utility company to proceed performing the additional work. A supplemental agreement needs to be prepared if the scope change exceeds 15% of the original cost or if the Commission obligation changes. If the scope of work changes and the total original cost does not exceed the 15% and a utility change order or a supplemental agreement is not prepared, the DUE is still obligated to advise the utility company is writing that the additional utility work is approved and the work can commence. Reimbursement for revisions in work requiring changes in lump sum agreements cannot be made unless a change order or supplemental agreement is approved before the work involved in the change is done. Utility change orders should be made out to the utility in the same name shown in the agreement and should be signed by the utility company. They must be numbered with their own sequence of numbers for each agreement independently of regular project change orders. State in the change order that it is a supplement to the agreement, and refer to the date of the agreement, except when it is submitted to obtain initial approval of a new agreement. Utility change orders shall follow the same approval guidelines as roadway change orders. There are frequent times when the RE receives an Actual Cost final bill and the total shows a much higher cost than the original estimate without a scope change. Reasons for higher costs could include: original estimate was underestimated, more equipment or man-hours needed to complete the work due to weather reasons. Below is a sample guide when to use a utility change order or supplemental agreement (MRUA or Standard Agreement) for non-scope changes. This situation typically occurs when utility forces perform the work.
|Amount in Original Actual Agreement||Final Bill Total Exceeds Original Amount|
When the final bill dramatically deviates from the original estimate, the utility company will be required to give reasons in a letter to the RE explaining why the bill increased. When an actual cost final bill exceeds the percentages shown above then a utility change order or supplemental agreement is required.
The RE should contact the DUE, if questions exist when to use a utility change order or when the DUE needs to complete a Supplemental Agreement.
618.104.22.168.2 Changes in Approved Utility Work Included in the Road Contract
On some projects utility work is included in the road contract. Examples of this work may include: water service adjustments, water main and sewer relocations, city lighting, etc. Roadway change orders are prepared to approve any changes to the work.
622.214.171.124 Maintaining Construction Records
Construction records must be kept to confirm that work is done in accordance with terms of the agreement and in the manner proposed in the plans. The importance of a complete and accurate record cannot be overemphasized. Detailed records are necessary to support the recommendation for payment of the final bill. A complete separate daily record must be kept on each actual cost adjustment and submitted for review when the final bill is recommended for payment. The RE may keep this record in a field book diary, or by use of Form C-9, Daily Utility Report.
6126.96.36.199.1 Items to Record for Utility Inspection
The type of records required will vary with the method of performing the adjustments.
Actual Cost Adjustment Made Entirely with Utility Company Forces. The inspector must keep a daily record of the number and classification of employees and number of hours worked. Records of material used and of retired materials returned to stock or scrapped must be kept. The utility company's major items of equipment must also be recorded. Sufficient records must be maintained to check and verify the items of labor, equipment, materials, and salvaged items as submitted on the final bill.
Actual Cost Adjustment Made by the Utility Company’s Contractor. When work is done by the contract method, the inspector will not generally be concerned with the items of labor and equipment. The inspector should ascertain that units of work as provided in the bid proposal are measured and recorded to form a basis for checking the final invoice. Daily diary entries should list the location and the number of units of work accomplished for that period. If contract labor or equipment is used by a utility on the basis of a bid per hour, per day, etc., it will be necessary to keep records on this labor or equipment time in the same manner as if the utility company were performing the work with its own forces.
Lump Sum Utility Agreement or an Adjustment by the Utility Contractor for Lump Sum Bid. Records of man hours, material items, or equipment times are not required. The inspector must be sure that work is done in accordance with the agreement and plans.
Records and Diary. The inspector must in all cases keep records and diary entries to document inclement weather, down time, and verbal authorization for minor changes. Progress records should be kept as necessary to coordinate highway and utility construction.
6188.8.131.52 Payment To Utility Companies For Reimbursable Work
All utility work not included in the roadway contract uses state funds (Accounting Code 9A). Utility work included in the roadway contract typically uses state funds but occasionally uses federal monies to fund the work.
The Commission allows utility companies to be prepaid prior to commencing work. Prepayment requests are initiated by the DUE and sent directly to the Controllers Office. Copies of prepayment memo’s are also forwarded to the Construction and Materials Division, the district construction office and the RE office. In some cases, utility companies are not prepaid for the utility work ahead of time or only a percentage of the estimated total.
6184.108.40.206.2 Partial Payment Invoices
If a utility company is not prepaid the entire estimated amount in the utility agreement, then the utility company may request an intermediate or partial payment after completing some or all of the proposed work. For partial payments, the utility is required to submit only a summary of work and materials for which payment is claimed, not a detailed billing. Check only to be sure that sufficient work has been done to justify making the requested payment. Payment should be authorized for allowable costs incurred up to the date of the partial payment request.
Partial payment invoices do not relieve the utility of responsibility for submitting one complete and final billing upon completion of the adjustment. The utility's address must be shown on the invoice. The RE should submit partial payment invoices to the Controllers Office within one week of receipt of invoice.
Partial payments for engineering work by consultants should not exceed the "maximum not to exceed amount" shown in the cost estimate unless additional costs are approved by the DUE.
One copy of the partial payment invoice and one copy of the RE's letter of recommendation must be sent to the Controllers Office for payment (a copy is sent to district construction and the DUE). The cover memo should include the project number, route, county, actual cost or lump sum utility agreement, Commission obligation (_ %), total cost estimate of commission obligation and indicate the partial payment number, i.e., partial payment number 1, 2, 3, 4. If more than one partial payment is requested by the utility company, the RE should submit progress payment bills to the Controllers Office in the following format:
|Partial Payment #1||$50,000|
|Partial Payment #2||$10,000|
|Total to Date Payment||$60,000|
This format will help clarify payment history with the utility company. Partial payments for actual cost utility agreements may not exceed the Commission's total estimated cost shown in the agreement. However, if the request for partial payment exceeds the original estimate, a change order with explanation should accompany the request (See EPG 6220.127.116.11.2 Changes in Approved Utility Work).
618.104.22.168.3 Final Invoice
Utility Companies are required to submit a final invoice to MoDOT for all actual cost reimbursable utility work and for any lump sum reimbursable utility work that was not prepaid. After the utility work has been fully completed, the RE should send the utility company a "60 Day" – Final Acceptance Letter requesting a complete final invoice within 60 days, as detailed in the utility agreement. If the final invoice is not received from the utility company within 30 days, then the RE should send a follow-up letter ("30 Day" Reminder Final Invoice Letter) reminding the utility of its obligation to submit a final invoice within 60 days of the completed work. If the RE does not receive a final invoice from the utility company within this timeframe, then the RE should contact the DUE for guidance on how to close out the work. The RE is expected to check the final bill within two weeks after receipt in as much detail as possible. It is the RE’s responsibility to verify from field records the quantities of labor, equipment, material used, and material retired, and to justify all changes made. They should also note all subcontractors working for the utility company and the subcontractor approval authorization dates given by the DUE. If the adjustment was made by the utility’s con-tractor at unit cost prices, then it is the RE’s responsibility to verify the number of units completed and not the hours of labor and equipment. It is also important for the utility to show the words "final bill" or "final invoice" on the last bill, in order for MoDOT to understand which bill is the last and final bill. The order of items in the final statement is to follow as closely as possible the order of items in the original estimate. A summary, on the utility company's letterhead, of the total cost of preliminary engineering, construction engineering, right of way, labor, overhead, construction travel expense, transportation, equipment, materials, supply, handling, and salvage credits should be shown in a way that will permit direct comparison with the approved estimate. The final bill must show a general description of the utility adjustment, the highway project number, the date on which work was completed or last item of billed expense was incurred, and the location where records can be audited. The RE is not expected to verify such items as overhead expenses, preliminary engineering, equipment rate, labor rate, etc. If the utility is using computerized billing procedures, it may be difficult to compare all the items in the final invoice to the original detailed estimate. The RE should note any question-able items in the final bill in the transmittal memo to the DUE. After the RE/inspector checks the final invoice and determines the utility has been overpaid, then the utility company will need to send MoDOT a check for the overpayment amount. The check should be payable to "Director of Revenue-Credit Road Fund". If the utility company did not send MoDOT an overpayment check with the final invoice then the RE should send a letter to the utility company requesting the over-payment check. After the RE’s review of the final invoice is complete, the RE should complete a Form C-13, Final Utility Report. A copy of the Final Utility Report must be submitted with the final bill for all reimbursable utility adjustments. This form shows the minimum information required by the RE.
The requested numbers shown on line 8 (Estimated Cost of Adjustment) and line 9 (Amount of Final Bill) in the Final Utility Report are Commission obligations totals. If the final invoice varies considerably from original estimate, the reason should be documented on the attachments of the Final Utility Report. Any intermediate payments should also be noted on the Final Utility Report as any additional information that might be helpful to the MoDOT auditor. The utility diary book or the Daily Utility Report, Form C-9, is to be submitted with the final utility report for all actual cost adjustments, but not for lump sum adjustments. All utility work (actual cost and lump sum) needs to be closed out by the RE office. One copy of the Final Utility Report, utility diary, field book or Daily Utility Reports, and the district engineer’s recommendation should be provided to accompany the final invoices. The RE’s memo should note any overpayments requested and if payment was received. This cover memo should be sent to the DUE and should include the project number, route, county, actual cost or lump sum utility agreement, Commission obligation (%), total cost estimate of Commission obligation and recommendation of payment or amount of overpayment received. The DUE will review the final paper work for accuracy and completion, if acceptable, and within 30 days of receipt, the DUE will sign the Final Utility Report and forward the RE memo and attachments to the Construction and Materials Division and also make a copy for the District Construction Office. The Commission may be obligated for construction costs to connect power or phone service to MoDOT facilities. District design works with the utility companies to account for this work. These reimbursable costs may include the following items: power to traffic signals, lighting facilities, ITS, cathodic protection or phone service to controllers among other MoDOT facilities. The RE is responsible to submit these costs for payment directly to the Controllers Office. The memo should include the bill and a letter from MoDOT approving the cost. A copy of this memo should also be sent to the DUE, the district construction office and the district traffic office.
622.214.171.124 Department Inspection And Surveying Coding
MoDOT’s construction staff performing utility inspection and utility surveying should charge their time to Incidental Construction.
All work must be done in conformity with the Commission’s utility policy.
The following policy is established for the location or relocation of utility facilities on the right of way of highways in the State Highway System. Any location or relocation of utility facilities contrary to this policy is declared to be an interference with the construction, maintenance or operation of state highways and their right of way and is prohibited. Except as herein described, all work to be performed on right of way of the State Highway System in connection with the location, relocation or maintenance of utilities, and where the roadway, shoulders or right of way will be affected by the work, must be done only under a permit or agreement to be issued by authority of the Highway and Transportation Commission. Application for such permits may be made on forms provided for that purpose and shall state specifically the nature of the work to be performed. A deposit may be required to insure completion in accordance with the permit issued. Applications for permits may be obtained at any of the ten District Highway Offices of the Commission, or by requesting the same from the Highway and Transportation Commission at Jefferson City, Missouri. Replacement of individual poles and attachments or other existing utility facilities where only spot excavation is required, and which excavation is not between the shoulder lines of the highway, may be considered as routine maintenance, and a permit will not be required provided the Company involved abides by all parking and access regulations contained elsewhere in this policy for the type of highway on which the maintenance work is to be performed. Where parking and access violations occur, the offending utility owner may be required to secure a permit for future maintenance work on the right of way. The policies prescribed in the attached documents are intended to reflect general policies of the Commission, and specific application should be made and permit obtained for the completed work rather than to rely upon the attached policies. In the event that utility lines or facilities are so damaged as to constitute an emergency situation directly affecting or endangering traffic on the highway, or public health or safety, access is permitted to the damaged facility by leaving the through roadways at such points as may be necessary to effect emergency repairs, provided immediate notice is given to the State Highway Patrol and the Commission’s district engineer. This policy does not apply to utility lines for service to facilities required for operating the highway.