Difference between revisions of "Category:610 Masonry Construction Laboratory Testing Guidelines"

From Engineering_Policy_Guide
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Sample Record: Per CM, updated link)
m (EPG 610 Masonry Construction Lab Testing Guidelines was virtually unchanged from its original Aug 2007 form. It had about 7385 hits.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
This article establishes procedures for Laboratory testing and reporting samples of sewer brick.
+
{|style="padding: 0.3em; margin-left:15px; border:2px solid #a9a9a9; text-align:center; font-size: 95%; background:#f5f5f5" width="350px" align="center"
 +
|-
 +
|'''This article has moved'''
 +
|-
 +
|EPG 610 Masonry Construction Laboratory Testing Guidelines has moved to [[:Category:647 Masonry Construction Laboratory Testing Guidelines|EPG 647 Masonry Construction Laboratory Testing Guidelines]]. The contents were not changed but the article was moved to make room for potential EPG info related to the new Sec 610.
 +
|}
  
No Laboratory tests are required for rubble masonry.
+
[[Category:647 Masonry Construction Laboratory Testing Guidelines]]
 
 
==Brick Masonry==
 
 
 
===Procedure===
 
Sewer brick shall be tested for compressive strength, absorption, and dimensions according to AASHTO M91.  Test results and calculations shall be recorded through SiteManager.
 
 
 
===Sample Record===
 
The sample record shall be completed in SiteManager as described in [http://contribute.modot.mo.gov/business/materials/pdf/vol_3/MMV3CONT.pdf Automation Section], and shall indicate acceptance, qualified acceptance, or rejection.  Appropriate remarks, as described in [[106.20 Reporting|EPG 106.20 Reporting]], are to be included in the remarks to clarify conditions of acceptance or rejection.  Test results shall be reported on the appropriate templates under the Tests tab.
 

Latest revision as of 10:29, 22 February 2017

This article has moved
EPG 610 Masonry Construction Laboratory Testing Guidelines has moved to EPG 647 Masonry Construction Laboratory Testing Guidelines. The contents were not changed but the article was moved to make room for potential EPG info related to the new Sec 610.