Difference between revisions of "Category talk:101 Standard Forms"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
At least one of the posters on this page (MCHR-9) is outdated. Would it be better to just have a link to the posters on MoDOT's "Contractor Forms" page? [http://www.modot.mo.gov/business/contractor_resources/forms.htm] | At least one of the posters on this page (MCHR-9) is outdated. Would it be better to just have a link to the posters on MoDOT's "Contractor Forms" page? [http://www.modot.mo.gov/business/contractor_resources/forms.htm] | ||
--[[User:Martik2|Martik2]] 12:16, 9 March 2010 (CST) | --[[User:Martik2|Martik2]] 12:16, 9 March 2010 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:smithk|Keith L. Smith]]: Thanks for the heads up. We got with External Civil Rights and they have revised what they want in the EPG. | ||
Revision as of 15:19, 9 March 2010
Please Correct the "construction Contingency" Cell within the Project Scoping Memorandum. Construction Contingency is suppose to be 2% but the cell is multiplying it by 3%.
Dan Tschirgi:The Project Scoping Memorandum has been corrected.
At least one of the posters on this page (MCHR-9) is outdated. Would it be better to just have a link to the posters on MoDOT's "Contractor Forms" page? [1] --Martik2 12:16, 9 March 2010 (CST)
Keith L. Smith: Thanks for the heads up. We got with External Civil Rights and they have revised what they want in the EPG.
