Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From Engineering_Policy_Guide
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Change Order Approval Rules)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
[[User:Tschid|Dan Tschirgi:]]  The discussion capabilities of the EPG are available for users to give comments and suggestions on the content of the guidance.  We are also appreciative for anyone pointing out errors and omissions.  Members of the Engineering Policy Group watch the articles for specific comments made.  The discussions can also take place between any users of the EPG.
 
[[User:Tschid|Dan Tschirgi:]]  The discussion capabilities of the EPG are available for users to give comments and suggestions on the content of the guidance.  We are also appreciative for anyone pointing out errors and omissions.  Members of the Engineering Policy Group watch the articles for specific comments made.  The discussions can also take place between any users of the EPG.
 +
 +
== Change Order Approval Rules ==
 +
 +
I do have a suggestion. We could use clarification of the Construction Manual/EPG for the change order approval rules in Section 137.2. Here is the excerpt from the EPG Section 137.2 for a Major Change Order: "5. Any change in a major item greater than 25%. 6. Any change of a contract amount greater than 25%."
 +
 +
It would be clearer if it said percentage of what number. For example, is #5 saying "any change in a major item greater than 25% of the line item or is it 25% of the original contract's Total Dollar Amount for the entire project. Can both #5 and #6 be clarified in the EPG? It would be helpful to add terminology that can clarify what number on the change order report (line item or total change for the report) is being compared to what number in the contract (line item, current contract amount, or original contract amount). It would be helpful to many, I think because this reads as being a little vague in my view.  SiteManager helps with this, but the reason a change order is the level that it is can sometimes still be unclear to me.

Revision as of 14:25, 29 May 2008

Why do we have 2 people on the front page that no longer work for MoDOT? Melissa left MoDOT for the City of Olathe and should not be featured on the front page. I can't remember the other guys name, but he has been retired for a couple of years. Can we get a picture with some current employees?

Keith L. Smith: Good question. Actually, as time passes, there will probably be several people pictured in the EPG that will have been part of our history. We are interested in portraying aspects of MoDOT (especially people at their work) in interesting, higher quality photos. Thus, the work portrayed is usually of much more importance than the people involved. It will probably not be necessary or desirable to erase photos from past employees. Thank you for your input!

Main Purpose of "Logging In" to EPG

I can use the EPG without logging in to the application. I just logged in for the first time and I see that I can participate in a Discussion Thread. Is this where we would point out spelling errors in the EPG, if we should find them? What is the "vision" for this Discussion Thread?

Dan Tschirgi: The discussion capabilities of the EPG are available for users to give comments and suggestions on the content of the guidance. We are also appreciative for anyone pointing out errors and omissions. Members of the Engineering Policy Group watch the articles for specific comments made. The discussions can also take place between any users of the EPG.

Change Order Approval Rules

I do have a suggestion. We could use clarification of the Construction Manual/EPG for the change order approval rules in Section 137.2. Here is the excerpt from the EPG Section 137.2 for a Major Change Order: "5. Any change in a major item greater than 25%. 6. Any change of a contract amount greater than 25%."

It would be clearer if it said percentage of what number. For example, is #5 saying "any change in a major item greater than 25% of the line item or is it 25% of the original contract's Total Dollar Amount for the entire project. Can both #5 and #6 be clarified in the EPG? It would be helpful to add terminology that can clarify what number on the change order report (line item or total change for the report) is being compared to what number in the contract (line item, current contract amount, or original contract amount). It would be helpful to many, I think because this reads as being a little vague in my view. SiteManager helps with this, but the reason a change order is the level that it is can sometimes still be unclear to me.