|
|
(735 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | [[Image:EPG 2013b.jpg|1030px|center]]
| + | __NOTOC__ |
| + | <div style="margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; background-color:black; border-radius:5px; box-shadow:5px 5px 5px #888888; border:1px solid black"> |
| + | <center> |
| + | <div class="jcarousel-wrapper" style="margin-top:7px; margin-bottom:0px"> |
| + | <div class="jcarousel jcarousel-randomize"> |
| + | <div class="jcarousel-list"> |
| + | <div class="jcarousel-item"> |
| + | {{banner|direction=left|width=20%||section=Engineering Policy Guide|section-link=Main Page|image=EPG-001.png}} |
| + | </div> |
| + | <div class="jcarousel-item"> |
| + | {{banner|direction=left|width=40%||section=Engineering Policy Guide|section-link=Main Page|image=EPG-002.png}} |
| + | </div> |
| + | <div class="jcarousel-item"> |
| + | {{banner|direction=left|width=40%||section=Engineering Policy Guide|section-link=Main Page|image=EPG-007.png}} |
| + | </div> |
| + | <div class="jcarousel-item"> |
| + | {{banner|direction=left|width=40%||section=Engineering Policy Guide|section-link=Main Page|image=EPG-004.png}} |
| + | </div> |
| + | <div class="jcarousel-item"> |
| + | {{banner|direction=left|width=40%||section=Engineering Policy Guide|section-link=Main Page|image=EPG-005.png}} |
| + | </div> |
| + | <div class="jcarousel-item"> |
| + | {{banner|direction=left|width=40%||section=Engineering Policy Guide|section-link=Main Page|image=EPG-006.png}} |
| + | </div> |
| + | <div class="jcarousel-item"> |
| + | {{banner|direction=left|width=40%||section=Engineering Policy Guide|section-link=Main Page|image=EPG-003.png}} |
| + | </div> |
| + | </div> |
| + | </div> |
| + | </div> |
| + | </center> |
| + | </div> |
| | | |
− | | + | {| style="text-align:center; margin-top:12px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; font-style:italic; font-size:20px; font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif !important;" |
− | {|style="padding: 0.3em; margin-left:0px; border:3px solid #a9a9a9; text-align:center; font-size: 100%; background:#E3C87E" width="1030px" align="center" | |
| |- | | |- |
− | |rowspan="2" align="right" |'''<font color = "white"><font size = 4.7><i>HELPFUL EPG VIDEOS: </i></font color="white"></font size = 5>|| ||align="left"|''' <BIG><font color = "white"><i>'''[[media:Logging into the EPG.wmv|•Logging into the EPG]]</i></font color="white"> ||align="left"|''' <BIG><font color = "white"><i>'''[[media:Help Finding EPG Info.wmv|•Finding Info in the EPG]]</i></font color="white">'''
| + | ! style="padding-left:90px; padding-right:90px; | |
− | |-
| + | ---- |
− | | ||align="left" colspan="2"|''' <Big><font color = "white"><i>[[media:Article History and Receiving.wmv|•Article History & How to Receive EMails When Articles are Revised]]</i></font color="white">
| + | Our mission is to provide a world-class transportation system that is</br>safe, innovative, reliable and dedicated to a prosperous Missouri. |
− | |-
| + | ---- |
− | |colspan="4" align="center"| <sup>'''___________'''</sup>
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |colspan="4" align="center"| '''<Big><font color = "white"><i>Want help on how to update your EPG guidance? It is available at [[:Help Article#EPG Approval Process|EPG Approval Process]].'''</i></font color="white">
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |colspan="4" align="center"| <sup>'''___________'''</sup>
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |colspan="4" align="center"| '''<Big><font color = "white"><i>[http://www.modot.org/business/standards_and_specs/highwayreadme.htm The Electronic MoDOT Spec Book for Mobile Devices] is now available. You may also [http://www.modot.org/eMoDOTWeb/jsp/signon/signon.jsp sign up for E-Update notices]. To receive notices regarding Engineering Policy Revisions, select "Engineering Policy" then mark the appropriate subjects of interest. '''</i></font color="white">
| |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
− | | + | {| style="width:100%; text-align:center; margin-top:0px;" |
− | | |
− | <div style="padding-bottom: .3em; margin: 0 .5em .5em"></div>
| |
− | {| cellspacing="3" | |
− | |- valign="top" width="100%"
| |
− | |style="border: 1px solid #696969; color: #000; background-color: #A9A9A9"|<big><center>'''<font color = "white"><i>WELCOME'''</i></font color="white"></center></big>
| |
− | | valign="top" width="60%" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3" style="border: 1px solid #FF8C00; background:#FFA500" align="center"|'''<big><font color="white"><i>RECENT POLICY CHANGES IN THE EPG</i></font color="white"></big>'''
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |valign="top" style="border: 1px solid #A9A9A9; color: #000; background-color: #F8F8FF"|
| |
− | {| style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto"
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |colspan="2" | [[image:Main Page Sep 8, 2015.jpg|center|400px|thumb|<center>''' [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pppTzvCcvdA&feature=player_embedded Distr. Bridge Engineer David O'Connor performs a regular 24-month inspection] on a Hickory Co. bridge. Here, he checks the condition of the deck. The info he gathers will help prioritize replacements, redecking or repair to ensure safety for travelers. </center> ''' ]]
| |
| |- | | |- |
− | |colspan="2" | [[image:Main Page Sep 4, 2015.jpg|center|400px|thumb|<center>''' The [http://www.kshb.com/news/local-news/old-i-35-ramp-closing-new-ramp-opening-at-pleasant-valley-road-in-clay-county?autoplay=true new ramp from Pleasant Valley Rd. to SB I-35] (on the right) in Clay Co. is now open. The old interchange is outdated and substandard. The new ramp has been moved to the outside to allow for safer merging onto I-35 and less weaving of traffic. Traffic signals have also been installed at the intersection. The new ramp is part of a larger effort to improve I-35 from Pleasant Valley Rd. to Vivion Rd. </center> ''' ]] | + | | [[image:Google search.png|200px|bottom|link=https://epg.modot.org/modot/EPG_GoogleSearch.html]] |
| + | | [[image:recent_changes.png|200px|bottom|link=Recent Policy Changes in the EPG]] |
| + | | [[image:TA_image.png|200px|bottom|link=616.8_Typical_Applications_(MUTCD_6H)#616.8.2.1_Typical_Applications]] |
| + | | [[image:MASH_info.png|200px|bottom|link=https://epg.modot.org/files/c/ce/MASH_Implementation.pdf]] |
| |- | | |- |
− | |colspan="2" | [[image:Main Page Aug 31, 2015.jpg|center|400px|thumb|<center>''' Contractor crews replace the bridge on Route 158, near Harviell in Butler County, with a box culvert. ''' </center>]]
| |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
− | MoDOT has made great strides to build a good transportation system and increase taxpayers' trust in its ability to deliver what was promised. Innovative concepts, such as [[:Category:143 Practical Design|Practical Design]] and [[:Category:139 Design - Build|design-build]], were used to deliver those commitments and have made MoDOT a leader in the transportation industry.
| + | <div style="margin-top:12px; font-size:95%; padding:5px; border:1px solid black;background-color:white; color:black; border-radius:5px; box-shadow:5px 5px 5px #888888"> |
| + | <b>MoDOT’s three pillars of “Safety, Service and Stability” steer our leadership and employees. Our commitment to safety includes keeping both customers and ourselves safe. Our service includes providing outstanding customer service, delivering transportation solutions of great value and using resources wisely. Keeping roads and bridges in good condition, operating a reliable and convenient transportation system, and advancing Missouri’s economic development reflect our commitment to stability.<br/>Innovative concepts, such as [[:Category:143 Practical Design|Practical Design]] and [[:Category:139 Design - Build|design-build]], are used to deliver our commitments. These and other forward-thinking concepts shape the content of the ENGINEERING POLICY GUIDE (EPG). This document provides a single reference for all engineering and engineering-related [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/br Bridge], [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/cm Construction], [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/DE/ Design], [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/ts Highway Safety & Traffic], [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/mt Maintenance], [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/tp Planning] and [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/DE/SitePages/Right-of-Way.aspx Right of Way] guidance.</b> |
| + | </div> |
| | | |
− | These forward-thinking, innovative concepts are reflected in the ''ENGINEERING POLICY GUIDE'' (EPG). This document provides a single reference for all engineering and engineering-related guidance by combining the former [http://sharepoint/sites/de/RealEstate/SitePages/Home.aspx Right of Way], [http://sharepoint/sites/de/Pages/default.aspx Design], [http://sharepoint/systemdelivery/br/pages/default.aspx Bridge], [http://sharepoint/systemdelivery/cm/Pages/default.aspx Construction], [http://sharepoint/systemdelivery/tr/Pages/default.aspx Traffic] and [http://sharepoint/systemdelivery/mt/default.aspx Maintenance] manuals.
| + | {| style="width:100%; text-align:center; margin-top:12px;" |
− | | |
− | MediaWiki, the engine behind the Wikipedia on the World Wide Web, is the software delivering the EPG. Over 30 million hits on the EPG endorse this format to be easy to navigate and pleasing to read. A small [[:Help:Contents|'''HELP ARTICLE''']] is included to assist with helpful hints on how to use the EPG as well as other points of interest.
| |
− | | |
− | {| style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto" | |
− | |-
| |
− | |colspan="2" | [[image:Main Page Aug 27, 2015.jpg|center|400px|thumb|<center>''' Sr. Maintc. Worker Chris Plaster (left) and Maintc. Worker Austin Davis of the Regional Bridge Crew help repair the Rte. 160 bridge west of Lamar. Because of deterioration, a 20-ton load limit was posted for the bridge in July. Once repairs are complete, the plan is to raise the load limit by Labor Day. ''' </center>]]
| |
− | |}
| |
− | | |
− | {| style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto" style="background-color: #F8F8FF"
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |colspan="2" |'''Perhaps you've wondered how many hits the most popular EPG articles have. As of early September, the numbers of hits are:'''
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |'''20.''' [[903.6 Warning Signs|EPG 903.6]], 119900 ||'''10.''' [[:Category:616 Temporary Traffic Control|EPG 616]], 169512
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |'''19.''' [[:Category:134 Engineering Professional Services|EPG 134]], 123274 ||'''9.''' [[:Category:600 INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION|EPG 600]], 203278
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |'''18.''' [[751.50 Standard Detailing Notes|EPG 751.50]], 125701 ||'''8.''' [[616.23 Traffic Control for Field Operations|EPG 616.23]], 217093
| |
| |- | | |- |
− | |'''17.''' [[751.40 Widening and Repair (Non-LRFD)|EPG 751.40]], 130213 ||'''7.''' [[:Category:101 Standard Forms|EPG 101]], 235045 | + | | [[image:Broken link.png|200px|bottom|link=mailto:engineering.policy@modot.mo.gov?Subject=Report%20a%20broken%20link&Body=Please%20include%20the%20broken%20link,%20article%20number%20and%20a%20screenshot%20if%20possible]] |
| + | | [[image:Approval process.png|200px|bottom|link=Help_Article#EPS_Approval_Process]] |
| + | | [[image:E-update.png|200px|bottom|link=Help_article#Signing_Up_for_E-Updates]] |
| |- | | |- |
− | |'''16.''' [[136.4 Consultant Selection and Consultant Contract Management|EPG 136.4]], 131618 ||'''6.''' [[:Category:100 GENERAL|EPG 100]], 250782
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |'''15.''' [[751.5 Standard Details|EPG 751.5]], 137146 ||'''5.''' [[:Category:700 STRUCTURES AND HYDRAULICS|EPG 700]], 258345
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |'''14.''' [[620.2 Pavement and Curb Markings (MUTCD Chapter 3B)|EPG 620.2]], 139950 || '''4.''' [[136.12 Figures, Glossary and Other Useful Links|EPG 136.12]], 259827
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |'''13.''' [[136.9 Plans, Specs and Estimates (PSE)|EPG 136.9]], 148668 || '''3.''' [[:Category:900 TRAFFIC CONTROL|EPG 900]], 280070
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |'''12.''' [[:Category:903 Highway Signing|EPG 903]], 151318 ||'''2.''' [[:Category:751 LRFD Bridge Design Guidelines|EPG 751]], 327755
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |'''11.''' [[:Category:200 GEOMETRICS|EPG 200]], 159182 ||'''1.''' EPG Main Page, 2087930
| |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
− | |valign="top" cellspacinepgg="0" cellpadding="5" style="border: 1px solid #FFA500; background:#ffdead"|
| + | <div style="margin-top:12px; font-size:95%; padding:5px; border:1px solid black;background-color:white; color:black; border-radius:5px; box-shadow:5px 5px 5px #888888"> |
− | '''Series I Protective Coating '''
| + | <b>The design concepts and criteria within the Engineering Policy Guide (EPG) are intended for use when designing new construction projects on new locations or designing reconstruction projects on existing locations. Projects on existing roadways call for a flexible, practical, and performance-based approach to design. The EPG encourages flexible and practical design, which emphasizes the role of the planning and design teams in determining appropriate design dimensions based on project-specific conditions and existing and future roadway performance, more than on meeting specific nominal design criteria. Although new design values and concepts may be presented throughout the EPG, this does not imply that existing roadways are unsafe, nor does it mandate the initiation of projects to improve existing roadways. While the EPG does include nearly all engineering related aspects of roadway design and maintenance it is not all encompassing. The use of properly equipped and maintained vehicles, operated by a capable user, is also pertinent to the safe and efficient operation of a transportation facility.</b> |
− | | + | </div> |
− | 8/28/15: Guidance in [[751.14 Steel Superstructure#751.14.5.8 Protective Coating Requirements|EPG 751.14.5.8 Protective Coating Requirements]] and [[751.50 Standard Detailing Notes#A4. Protective Coatings|EPG 751.50 Standard Detailing Notes A4. Protective Coatings]] was revised to conform to Sec 1081, clarifying when to use System I.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[Other Aspects of Pavement Design#Purpose of Alternate and Optional Pavement Bidding|Alternate Paving Minimal Thickness]]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 8/27/15: Guidance was clarified to indicate the minimal thickness of pavement must be 7" for a Life Cycle Cost Adjustment to be applied.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[:Category:129 Public Involvement#129.4 Coordination with other Agencies|EPG 129.4 Coordination with other Agencies]]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 8/25/15: Guidance was clarified about the list of agencies with whom to coordinate the environmental process.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[:Category:105 Control of Work#After a project has been completed|EPG 105.15 Acceptance]]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 8/25/15: Guidance about contractor's surety has been clarified since contractor surety has not been necessary for some time.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[http://sharepoint/sites/de/environmental_historic_pres/Stormwater/MS4-TS4/IDDE/idde-print_LPHA.pdf Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Fact Sheet]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 8/24/15: This helpful document is available at [[127.29 Storm Water#Private homeowners are regulated|EPG 127.29.5 MCM 3: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination]].
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[:Category:550 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Design|EPG 550.1 Safety Edge<sup>SM</sup>]]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 8/19/15: This new subarticle updates EPG guidance to current practice for concrete design.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[:Category:806 Pollution, Erosion and Sediment Control#For projects performed by MoDOT’s internal staff|EPG 806.7.6 Pollution, Erosion and Sediment Control Basis of Payment]]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 8/17/15: To maintain compliance with the Consent Decree's requirements, erosion control change order guidance has been provided.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[:Category:109 Measurement and Payment#Erosion Control Change Orders|Erosion Control Change Orders]]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 8/11/15: Guidance was updated in EPG 109.12 Change Orders because the EPA is now mandating the Stormwater Compliance and Environmental Specialist be able to execute change orders up to $100,000 for erosion control items.
| |
− | | |
− | '''ET-Plus Policy'''
| |
− | | |
− | 8/7/15: In [[606.1 Guardrail#All guardrail end terminals that are not currently|EPG 606.1.3.1 3R/4R Projects]], guidance now requires ET-Plus end treatment devices to be replaced during construction or repair, including anytime existing adjacent guardrail is raised or the end treatment modified.
| |
− | | |
− | '''Concrete Coring'''
| |
− | | |
− | 8/6/15: In several locations in EPG 751 LRFD Bridge Design Guidelines, references to concrete coring of drilled shafts were removed because it is no longer specified on a set of bridge plans for integrity testing of drilled shafts. During construction, concrete coring may still be called for by the engineer when there is a dispute with the sonic logging testing.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[Media:234.2.1.1 Diamond Interchange.pdf|Geometric Layout of a Diamond Interchange]]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 7/31/15: In [[234.2 Diamond Interchanges#234.2.1.1 Ramp and Preliminary Plan Criteria|EPG 234.2.1.1 Ramp and Preliminary Plan Criteria]], the 700 ft. dimension between ramp termini previously shown in this diagram was revised to 800 ft. to reflect recent USDOT/FHWA guidance.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[236.3 Administration#236.3.7.5 Distribution of Clearance Certification|EPG 236.3.7.5 Distribution of Clearance Certification]]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 7/24/15: Guidance has been provided for loading documents into RWPA.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[media:616.14 WZ Questions.docx|Work Zone Questions for the Core Team]]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 7/23/15: This new list has been produced to aid PMs and the core team to develop the WZ JSP and to identify early on the WZ impacts. It is available in [[616.14 Work Zone Safety and Mobility Policy#616.14.3.2.4 Project Core Team|EPG 616.14.3.2.4 Project Core Team]].
| |
− | | |
− | '''PCC and Superpave Smoothness '''
| |
− | | |
− | 7/22/15: Guidance about PCC and Superpave concerning smoothness in [[:Category:403 Asphaltic Concrete Pavement#Inertial Profiler Test Results|EPG 403.1.17 Quality Control]], [[:Category:403 Asphaltic Concrete Pavement#Diamond Grinding|EPG 403.1.21 Basis of Payment]] and [[:Category:502 Portland Cement Concrete Base and Pavement#502.1.8 Surface Test (Sec 502.8)|EPG 502.1.8 Surface Test]] was revised to comply with Sec 610.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[http://epg.modot.org/index.php?title=Help_Article#EPG_Ballot_Cycles Engineering Policy Group Ballot Cycles]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 7/17/15: The ballot cycle dates have been updated.
| |
− | | |
− | '''New RW Form'''
| |
− | | |
− | 7/15/15: The new [[media:236.7 Opinion Survey 2015.docx|Property Owner Opinion Survey]] will help property owners show how MoDOT representatives performed their job of acquiring property rights and, perhaps, indicate possible future improvements.
| |
− | | |
− | '''Fatal Crash Reviews'''
| |
− | | |
− | 7/15/15: Fatal crash reviews are now an optional regional council process. EPG 907.6 Fatal Crash Reviews has been removed.
| |
− | | |
− | '''Composite Design for Steel Superstructures'''
| |
− | | |
− | 7/9/15: In [[751.10 General Superstructure#For MoDOT Standard Girders Type 2, 3 and 4, and Steel Girders:|EPG 751.10.2.1 Precast Prestressed Concrete Panel Forms - Design]] and especially in [[751.14 Steel Superstructure#751.14.4 Composite Design|EPG 751.14.4 Composite Design]], guidance and details about making steel girders and beams composite were added.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[:Category:806 Pollution, Erosion and Sediment Control#Temporary Stream Crossing (Sec. 806.100)|Construction Inspection Guidance for Temporary Stream Crossings]]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 7/9/15: Guidance was updated to bring it into compliance with Sec 303.2.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[:Category:620 Pavement Marking#Pavement Marking Guidelines|Pavement Marking Guidelines]]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 7/8/15: The types of paint available to contractors has been clarified in this table. A diagram, "Pavement Marking Material Decision Tree for Design Projects", was also added.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[:Category:109 Measurement and Payment#109.12 Change Orders (for Sec 109.12)|EPG 109.12 Change Orders]]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 7/7/15: Under MoDOT's agreement with FHWA, Level 2 change orders will also be sent to FHWA for review.
| |
− | | |
− | '''Custody of QA Cores'''
| |
− | | |
− | 7/1/15: In [http://epg.modot.org/index.php?title=Category:403_Asphaltic_Concrete_Pavement#403.1.19_Acceptance_of_Material_.28Sec_403.19.29 EPG 403.1.19 Acceptance of Material] and [http://epg.modot.org/index.php?title=Category:502_Portland_Cement_Concrete_Base_and_Pavement#502.2_Material_Inspection EPG 502.2 Material Inspection], guidance has been updated to show that tamper-proof bags will be used when the MoDOT project inspector could not maintain full-time possession.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[#143.2 Practical Design Concepts to Consider|EPG 143.2 Practical Design Concepts to Consider]]'''
| |
− | | |
− | 6/30/15: This new guidance leads designers to consider typical items during project design to produce a practical application of radical cost control.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[106.3.2.86 TM-86 Preparation of Samples for Surface Sealer Wet Track Abrasion|EPG 106.3.2.86 TM-86 Preparation of Samples for Surface Sealer Wet Track Abrasion]]
| |
− | | |
− | 6/30/15: This is a new MoDOT Test Method.
| |
− | | |
− | '''[[:Category:409 Seal Coat|Seal Coats]] and [[:Category:402 Bituminous Surface Leveling|Contracting Level Coats]] '''
| |
| | | |
− | 6/26/15: The CLC and Seal Coat guidelines and JSP packages were updated. Guidance in [[:Category:409 Seal Coat#409.1 Design|EPG 409.1 Design]] now provides contractor flexibility and increases the potential usage of seal coats.
| + | <div style="margin-top:12px; background-color:black; color:white; border-radius:5px; box-shadow:5px 5px 5px #888888"> |
| + | <center>'''The Engineering Policy Guide is maintained via the use of Microsoft Edge. For optimal viewing quality, please choose Microsoft Edge for your browser.'''</center> |
| + | </div> |