Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Engineering_Policy_Guide
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (EPG Othere Aspects of Pavement Design)
m (EPG 751.50, EPG 751.14)
Line 50: Line 50:
 
|colspan="2" |'''Perhaps you've wondered how many hits the most popular EPG articles have.  As of late August, the numbers of hits are:'''
 
|colspan="2" |'''Perhaps you've wondered how many hits the most popular EPG articles have.  As of late August, the numbers of hits are:'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''20.'''  [[903.6 Warning Signs|EPG 903.6]], 119573 ||'''10.''' [[:Category:616 Temporary Traffic Control|EPG 616]], 169009
+
|'''20.'''  [[903.6 Warning Signs|EPG 903.6]], 119600 ||'''10.''' [[:Category:616 Temporary Traffic Control|EPG 616]], 169053
 
|-
 
|-
|'''19.'''  [[:Category:134 Engineering Professional Services|EPG 134]], 122392     ||'''9.'''  [[:Category:600 INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION|EPG 600]], 202723
+
|'''19.'''  [[:Category:134 Engineering Professional Services|EPG 134]], 122490     ||'''9.'''  [[:Category:600 INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION|EPG 600]], 202774
 
|-
 
|-
|'''18.'''  [[751.50 Standard Detailing Notes|EPG 751.50]], 124507   ||'''8.'''  [[616.23 Traffic Control for Field Operations|EPG 616.23]], 216355
+
|'''18.'''  [[751.50 Standard Detailing Notes|EPG 751.50]], 124549   ||'''8.'''  [[616.23 Traffic Control for Field Operations|EPG 616.23]], 216395
 
|-
 
|-
|'''17.'''  [[136.4 Consultant Selection and Consultant Contract Management|EPG 136.4]], 129735   ||'''7.''' [[:Category:101 Standard Forms|EPG 101]], 232959
+
|'''17.'''  [[136.4 Consultant Selection and Consultant Contract Management|EPG 136.4]], 129820   ||'''7.''' [[:Category:101 Standard Forms|EPG 101]], 233186
 
|-
 
|-
|'''16.'''    [[751.40 Widening and Repair (Non-LRFD)|EPG 751.40]], 129945   ||'''6.'''  [[:Category:100 GENERAL|EPG 100]], 250186
+
|'''16.'''    [[751.40 Widening and Repair (Non-LRFD)|EPG 751.40]], 129959   ||'''6.'''  [[:Category:100 GENERAL|EPG 100]], 250249
 
|-
 
|-
|'''15.'''    [[751.5 Standard Details|EPG 751.5]], 136630     ||'''5.''' [[136.12 Figures, Glossary and Other Useful Links|EPG 136.12]], 256236
+
|'''15.'''    [[751.5 Standard Details|EPG 751.5]], 136681     ||'''5.''' [[136.12 Figures, Glossary and Other Useful Links|EPG 136.12]], 256464
 
|-
 
|-
|'''14.'''    [[620.2 Pavement and Curb Markings (MUTCD Chapter 3B)|EPG 620.2]], 139250     || '''4.''' [[:Category:700 STRUCTURES AND HYDRAULICS|EPG 700]], 257794
+
|'''14.'''    [[620.2 Pavement and Curb Markings (MUTCD Chapter 3B)|EPG 620.2]], 139304     || '''4.''' [[:Category:700 STRUCTURES AND HYDRAULICS|EPG 700]], 257872
 
|-
 
|-
|'''13.'''    [[136.9 Plans, Specs and Estimates (PSE)|EPG 136.9]], 147146   || '''3.''' [[:Category:900 TRAFFIC CONTROL|EPG 900]], 279373
+
|'''13.'''    [[136.9 Plans, Specs and Estimates (PSE)|EPG 136.9]], 147348   || '''3.''' [[:Category:900 TRAFFIC CONTROL|EPG 900]], 279443
 
|-
 
|-
|'''12.'''  [[:Category:903 Highway Signing|EPG 903]], 150895 ||'''2.''' [[:Category:751 LRFD Bridge Design Guidelines|EPG 751]], 326714
+
|'''12.'''  [[:Category:903 Highway Signing|EPG 903]], 150929 ||'''2.''' [[:Category:751 LRFD Bridge Design Guidelines|EPG 751]], 326844
 
|-
 
|-
|'''11.'''  [[:Category:200 GEOMETRICS|EPG 200]], 158493 ||'''1.''' EPG Main Page, 2076674
+
|'''11.'''  [[:Category:200 GEOMETRICS|EPG 200]], 158586 ||'''1.''' EPG Main Page, 2077794
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
|valign="top" cellspacinepgg="0" cellpadding="5" style="border: 1px solid #FFA500; background:#ffdead"|
 
|valign="top" cellspacinepgg="0" cellpadding="5" style="border: 1px solid #FFA500; background:#ffdead"|
 +
'''Series I Protective Coating '''
 +
 +
8/28/15: Guidance in [[751.14 Steel Superstructure#751.14.5.8 Protective Coating Requirements|EPG 751.14.5.8 Protective Coating Requirements]] and [[751.50 Standard Detailing Notes#A4. Protective Coatings|EPG 751.50 Standard Detailing Notes A4. Protective Coatings]] was revised to conform to Sec 1081, clarifying when to use System I.
 +
 
'''[[Other Aspects of Pavement Design#Purpose of Alternate and Optional Pavement Bidding|Alternate Paving Minimal Thickness]]'''
 
'''[[Other Aspects of Pavement Design#Purpose of Alternate and Optional Pavement Bidding|Alternate Paving Minimal Thickness]]'''
  
Line 167: Line 171:
  
 
6/26/15: The CLC and Seal Coat guidelines and JSP packages were updated.  Guidance in [[:Category:409 Seal Coat#409.1 Design|EPG 409.1 Design]] now provides contractor flexibility and increases the potential usage of seal coats.
 
6/26/15: The CLC and Seal Coat guidelines and JSP packages were updated.  Guidance in [[:Category:409 Seal Coat#409.1 Design|EPG 409.1 Design]] now provides contractor flexibility and increases the potential usage of seal coats.
 
'''[[606.1 Guardrail#Wherever the resurfacing of the travelway and the shoulders results|Guardrail Height]]'''
 
 
6/25/15: Guardrail adjustment height requirements has been clarified. The minimum height after adjusting/replacing blocks is 27 ¾ inches.
 

Revision as of 13:41, 28 August 2015

EPG 2013b.jpg


HELPFUL EPG VIDEOS: •Logging into the EPG •Finding Info in the EPG
•Article History & How to Receive EMails When Articles are Revised
___________
Want help on how to update your EPG guidance?  It is available at EPG Approval Process.
___________
The Electronic MoDOT Spec Book for Mobile Devices is now available. You may also sign up for E-Update notices. To receive notices regarding Engineering Policy Revisions, select "Engineering Policy" then mark the appropriate subjects of interest.


WELCOME
RECENT POLICY CHANGES IN THE EPG
Sr. Maintc. Worker Chris Plaster (left) and Maintc. Worker Austin Davis of the Regional Bridge Crew help repair the Rte. 160 bridge west of Lamar. Because of deterioration, a 20-ton load limit was posted for the bridge in July. Once repairs are complete, the plan is to raise the load limit by Labor Day.
Don Schnieders Excavating Company employees are in the process of replacing the Indian Camp Cr. Bridge on Warren County Rte. J.
The contractor is making great progress on Rte. 51’s bridge over Little Whitewater Cr. near Patton in Bollinger County.

MoDOT has made great strides to build a good transportation system and increase taxpayers' trust in its ability to deliver what was promised. Innovative concepts, such as Practical Design and design-build, were used to deliver those commitments and have made MoDOT a leader in the transportation industry.

These forward-thinking, innovative concepts are reflected in the ENGINEERING POLICY GUIDE (EPG). This document provides a single reference for all engineering and engineering-related guidance by combining the former Right of Way, Design, Bridge, Construction, Traffic and Maintenance manuals.

MediaWiki, the engine behind the Wikipedia on the World Wide Web, is the software delivering the EPG. Over 30 million hits on the EPG endorse this format to be easy to navigate and pleasing to read. A small HELP ARTICLE is included to assist with helpful hints on how to use the EPG as well as other points of interest.

Crews temporarily closed the northbound I-635 off ramp, Horizons Parkway and Argosy Casino Parkway for the delivery of these massive girders. These girders are 6.5 ft. tall and up to 168 ft. long, were fabricated in Kansas City, KS and will be shipped via tractor trailer. These girders will be the first to be set for the new U.S. 69 Highway Bridge over the Missouri River. The new structure will include multiple lanes and bike/pedestrian access and will be open to traffic in December 2016.
Perhaps you've wondered how many hits the most popular EPG articles have. As of late August, the numbers of hits are:
20. EPG 903.6, 119600 10. EPG 616, 169053
19. EPG 134, 122490 9. EPG 600, 202774
18. EPG 751.50, 124549 8. EPG 616.23, 216395
17. EPG 136.4, 129820 7. EPG 101, 233186
16. EPG 751.40, 129959 6. EPG 100, 250249
15. EPG 751.5, 136681 5. EPG 136.12, 256464
14. EPG 620.2, 139304 4. EPG 700, 257872
13. EPG 136.9, 147348 3. EPG 900, 279443
12. EPG 903, 150929 2. EPG 751, 326844
11. EPG 200, 158586 1. EPG Main Page, 2077794

Series I Protective Coating

8/28/15: Guidance in EPG 751.14.5.8 Protective Coating Requirements and EPG 751.50 Standard Detailing Notes A4. Protective Coatings was revised to conform to Sec 1081, clarifying when to use System I.

Alternate Paving Minimal Thickness

8/27/15: Guidance was clarified to indicate the minimal thickness of pavement must be 7" for a Life Cycle Cost Adjustment to be applied.

EPG 129.4 Coordination with other Agencies

8/25/15: Guidance was clarified about the list of agencies with whom to coordinate the environmental process.

EPG 105.15 Acceptance

8/25/15: Guidance about contractor's surety has been clarified since contractor surety has not been necessary for some time.

Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Fact Sheet

8/24/15: This helpful document is available at EPG 127.29.5 MCM 3: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination.

EPG 550.1 Safety EdgeSM

8/19/15: This new subarticle updates EPG guidance to current practice for concrete design.

EPG 806.7.6 Pollution, Erosion and Sediment Control Basis of Payment

8/17/15: To maintain compliance with the Consent Decree's requirements, erosion control change order guidance has been provided.

Erosion Control Change Orders

8/11/15: Guidance was updated in EPG 109.12 Change Orders because the EPA is now mandating the Stormwater Compliance and Environmental Specialist be able to execute change orders up to $100,000 for erosion control items.

ET-Plus Policy

8/7/15: In EPG 606.1.3.1 3R/4R Projects, guidance now requires ET-Plus end treatment devices to be replaced during construction or repair, including anytime existing adjacent guardrail is raised or the end treatment modified.

Concrete Coring

8/6/15: In several locations in EPG 751 LRFD Bridge Design Guidelines, references to concrete coring of drilled shafts were removed because it is no longer specified on a set of bridge plans for integrity testing of drilled shafts. During construction, concrete coring may still be called for by the engineer when there is a dispute with the sonic logging testing.

Geometric Layout of a Diamond Interchange

7/31/15: In EPG 234.2.1.1 Ramp and Preliminary Plan Criteria, the 700 ft. dimension between ramp termini previously shown in this diagram was revised to 800 ft. to reflect recent USDOT/FHWA guidance.

EPG 236.3.7.5 Distribution of Clearance Certification

7/24/15: Guidance has been provided for loading documents into RWPA.

Work Zone Questions for the Core Team

7/23/15: This new list has been produced to aid PMs and the core team to develop the WZ JSP and to identify early on the WZ impacts. It is available in EPG 616.14.3.2.4 Project Core Team.

PCC and Superpave Smoothness

7/22/15: Guidance about PCC and Superpave concerning smoothness in EPG 403.1.17 Quality Control, EPG 403.1.21 Basis of Payment and EPG 502.1.8 Surface Test was revised to comply with Sec 610. 

Engineering Policy Group Ballot Cycles

7/17/15: The ballot cycle dates have been updated.

New RW Form

7/15/15: The new Property Owner Opinion Survey will help property owners show how MoDOT representatives performed their job of acquiring property rights and, perhaps, indicate possible future improvements.

Fatal Crash Reviews

7/15/15: Fatal crash reviews are now an optional regional council process. EPG 907.6 Fatal Crash Reviews has been removed.

Composite Design for Steel Superstructures

7/9/15: In EPG 751.10.2.1 Precast Prestressed Concrete Panel Forms - Design and especially in EPG 751.14.4 Composite Design, guidance and details about making steel girders and beams composite were added.

Construction Inspection Guidance for Temporary Stream Crossings

7/9/15: Guidance was updated to bring it into compliance with Sec 303.2.

Pavement Marking Guidelines

7/8/15: The types of paint available to contractors has been clarified in this table. A diagram, "Pavement Marking Material Decision Tree for Design Projects", was also added.

EPG 109.12 Change Orders

7/7/15: Under MoDOT's agreement with FHWA, Level 2 change orders will also be sent to FHWA for review. 

Custody of QA Cores

7/1/15: In EPG 403.1.19 Acceptance of Material and EPG 502.2 Material Inspection, guidance has been updated to show that tamper-proof bags will be used when the MoDOT project inspector could not maintain full-time possession.

EPG 143.2 Practical Design Concepts to Consider

6/30/15: This new guidance leads designers to consider typical items during project design to produce a practical application of radical cost control.

EPG 106.3.2.86 TM-86 Preparation of Samples for Surface Sealer Wet Track Abrasion

6/30/15: This is a new MoDOT Test Method.

Seal Coats and Contracting Level Coats

6/26/15: The CLC and Seal Coat guidelines and JSP packages were updated. Guidance in EPG 409.1 Design now provides contractor flexibility and increases the potential usage of seal coats.