Category:134 Engineering Professional Services
From Engineering Policy Guide
When projected workloads are high and available MoDOT staffing resources are limited, the need may arise to solicit for consultant services. EPG 134 Engineering Professional Services is a guide for soliciting, selecting and managing consultant contracts with MoDOT. Professional services are defined under the federal law, The Brooks Act, 40 USC 1102. Most consulting services that MoDOT utilizes fall under the federal description of professional services, therefore MoDOT must follow the federal guidelines outlined in the Brooks Act for soliciting and selecting a consultant.
134.1.1 Federal Law
The Brooks Act, 40 USC 1101 – 1104, 23 CFR 172.3 (Public Law 92-582, 1972) requires agencies to “promote open competition by advertising, ranking, selecting and negotiating contracts based on demonstrated competence and qualifications for the type of engineering and design services being procured, and at a fair and reasonable price.” This requirement applies to all federally funded projects. This is commonly referred to as Qualifications Based Selection or QBS, meaning a firm is chosen based on qualifications and not price.
134.1.2 State Law
Commonly referred to as the “Mini-Brooks Act”, the State of Missouri, in sections 8.285 thru 8.291 RsMO, requires Qualification Based Selection (QBS) for all architectural, engineering and land surveying professional services and reflects the language contained in the federal legislation. This requirement applies to ALL projects in Missouri regardless if it contains federal funds or not. Keep in mind that the federal laws supersede the state laws if the project has federal funding.
134.1.3 Consultant Qualification
|Forms and Figures|
|Fig. 134.2.2 Processing Standard Consultant Contracts Checklist|
|Fig. 188.8.131.52, Solicitation and Request Letter|
|Fig. 184.108.40.206.1, Consultant Rating Form|
|Fig. 220.127.116.11.2, Consultant Selection Rating Summary|
|Fig. 18.104.22.168.3, Consultant Selection Approval Letter|
|Fig. 22.214.171.124.4, PSC Review of Short List|
|Fig. 126.96.36.199.5, Sample Criteria and Point Values for Rating Presentations/Interviews|
|Fig. 188.8.131.52.6, Invitation to Present|
|Fig. 184.108.40.206.7, Sample Letter to Interview|
|Fig. 134.2.4 Processing On-Call/MOU Consultant Contracts Checklist|
|Fig. 134.3.1, District Checklist for Reviewing Executed Consultant Contracts|
|Fig. 134.3.2, MoDOT Allowable Profit Curve|
|Fig. 220.127.116.11.1, Common Unallowable Costs|
|Fig. 18.104.22.168.2, Overhead Schedule Example|
|Fig. 134.4.1, PSC Approval to Execute Contract|
|Fig. 134.4.2, Notice to Proceed (NTP) Letter|
|Fig. 22.214.171.124, Blank Consultant Invoice|
|Fig. 126.96.36.199, MoDOT Consultant Invoice Checklist|
|Fig. 188.8.131.52, Blank Consultant Invoice - Hourly Rate Contracts (only)|
|Fig. 184.108.40.206, MoDOT Consultant Invoice Checklist - Hourly Rate Contracts (only)|
|Fig. 220.127.116.11, Example Invoice|
|Fig. 134.5.2, PSC Approval to Execute Supplemental Agreement|
|EPG 237.14.4 Specifications of Computer Deliverable Contract Plans|
Effective January 1, 2013, all prime consultants must be prequalified to perform engineering services on any project. To become prequalified the consultant will be required to do the following:
- 1. Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) on file with MoDOT
- 2. Registered to do business in Missouri (Certificate of Good Standing) and hold a certificate of authority with the Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers, Professional Land Surveyors and Landscape Architects. (Note: A Certificate of Authority is not required for sole proprietorships or partnerships. It is only required if the firm is incorporated or registered as a limited liability company. For sole proprietorships and/or partnerships, individual professional license certificates must be submitted in lieu of the Certificate of Authority.)
- 3. Have current E-Verify MOU and E-Verify Affidavit
- E-Verify MOU – one time submittal
- E-Verify Affidavit - yearly
- 4. Have current Annual Financial Prequalification with MoDOT
- Step-by-step instruction for becoming prequalified and a list of pre-qualified consultants can be found on MoDOT's Consultant Services webpage.
- This annual financial prequalification is good for one year.
- 5. MoDOT Bridge Consultants Only (Not required for LPA Consultants): ): All bridge plans for MoDOT projects must be signed and sealed by a professional engineer from a firm that is prequalified for bridge design (with the firm’s logo shown in the title block of the bridge plans). For consultants who wish to become prequalified to perform bridge design, MoDOT's Bridge Division requires that the consultant submit a Bridge Experience Profile and a Personal Bridge Experience Record. These forms can be found on MoDOT's Consultant Services webpage and must be updated every 3 years. In addition, the consultant must have a QA/QC plan on file with MoDOT that also must be updated every 3 years. The prime consultant is not required to be prequalified for bridge design unless the scope of work performed by their firm includes bridge design. For more information, please contact MoDOT's Bridge Division.
The prequalification process complies with AASHTO guidelines published in the Uniform Audit & Accounting Guide, 2012 Edition. This prequalification process ensures that projects are in compliance with state and federal regulations.
The prequalification is only required for prime consultants. Subconsultants are strongly encouraged to become prequalified in order to reduce repetitive paperwork for future projects. For more information on subconsultant requirements see EPG 134.3.5 Subconsultants.
For prequalification requirements for LPA consultants, see EPG 18.104.22.168 Consultant Qualification.
Non-Profit and Governmental Indirect Cost Rate Requirements
In order to claim indirect costs for grant reimbursement, each such sub-recipient is required to annually submit a signed cost allocation plan for review and acceptance by MoDOT. The rate must be audited by an independent certified public accountant (CPA) firm with experience in preparing cost allocation plans for non-profit or governmental organizations in accordance with 2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.
Compliance with 2 CFR 200 requires MoDOT to review the following documents:
- 1. Cost allocation plan
- 2. Organization chart
- 3. Employee time sheet sample showing allocation of direct and indirect labor hours
- 4. Audited schedules of indirect costs and fringe benefits
- 5. Audited, reviewed or compiled financial statements
- 6. Certification of indirect costs
- 7. Listing of grants/contracts with MoDOT
134.1.4 Conflict of Interest
A conflict of interest occurs when a consultant has a financial or personal interest in a federally funded project. To avoid a potential conflict of interest, see 23 CFR 1.33 for the federal law governing Conflict of Interest.
All consultants receiving individual awards and all subrecipients/subconsultants must certify that the organization and its principles are not suspended or debarred. Each MoDOT Project Manager should check the Non-procurement List. The Excluded Parties List Systems is also available at that website. Copies of the list may be obtained by purchasing a yearly subscription from the Superintendent of the Documents, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 or by calling the Government Printing Office inquiry and Order Desk at (202)783-3238. The user will be required to record their name and organization for purposes of the Computer Matching and Privacy Act of 1988.
134.1.6 Frequently Asked Questions
A list of FAQs regarding consultant issues can be found on FHWA’s website.
134.1.7 Workforce Diversity
Diversity includes all the characteristics and experiences that define each individual. Diversity includes a wide range of individual characteristics such as age, religion, gender, race, ethnicity, disability and sexual orientation. Diversity can also include such things as communication style, work style, economic status and geographic origin. MoDOT supports and encourages diversity within the transportation industry. MoDOT’s desire is for the diversity of its consultants and contractors to reflect the diversity of the citizens of Missouri.
MoDOT’s engineering consultant solicitations require the consultant to describe their company’s approach to promoting and developing a diverse workforce. This category within the solicitation is a pass/fail category. An example of promoting and developing diversity is being involved with local secondary and higher education facilities to educate individuals in the field of engineering. Developing a cooperative/training program targeting the wide range of individual characteristics as listed above would be another example how firms are embracing workforce diversity. Continual efforts of encouraging a wide range of diverse individuals to the field of engineering will in turn develop a more diverse workforce.
Workforce diversity within the consulting firm as a whole can sometimes vary drastically from the diversity within the project team producing the work. Assembling diverse project teams is a way to support workforce diversity. Engineering consulting firms will be required to report on the project team’s diversity in the workforce diversity verification section of the template invoice, Fig. 22.214.171.124, Blank Consultant Invoice. See EPG 126.96.36.199 for workforce diversity reporting requirements.
Workforce diversity differs from Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE). DBE focuses on firms owned and operated by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. For more information on DBE, visit MoDOT’s External Civil Rights webpage.
134.2 Solicitation and Selection Process
When MoDOT needs consultant services, specific processes for soliciting and selecting a consultant must be followed. MoDOT must use the Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) for the procurement of engineering and design related services. This is mandated by both the federal and state law. See EPG 134.1.1 Federal Law and EPG 134.1.2 State Law for the applicable laws. If MoDOT does not follow the solicitation and selection process, federal funds could be jeopardized.
134.2.1 Professional Services Committee (PSC)
The PSC ensures that MoDOT follows State and Federal laws for the use of professional services. The committee is composed of the Transportation Planning Director, State Design Engineer (chair) and the State Bridge Engineer. The committee may incorporate additional Division Directors/Engineers for contracts involving areas under their purview. On behalf of the committee, the Chair approves or rejects the selection of the consultant. The PSC provides comments as needed.
MoDOT is committed to getting the “best value for every dollar spent”. This is accomplished in the consultant selection by using the QBS process and selecting the most qualified consultant not the lowest bidder. The PSC ensures that MoDOT follows the QBS process for all MoDOT consultant procurements with the exception of the Design-Build projects where the Design Build Project Director is responsible for ensuring QBS is followed.
The PSC committee chair approval is required at several stages.
- 1. The PSC chair approves the district or division engineer’s request to solicit consultants to provide professional services for MoDOT.
- 2. For contracts involving interviews or presentations, the PSC chair approves the “short list” first and is invited to attend the interview or presentations.
- 3. For standard contracts and supplemental agreements, the PSC chair approves the consultant selection, the negotiated number of man-hours and the “not to exceed” amount of the contract concurrent with the execution of the contract. The PSC and division liaisons provide review and comment to the chair prior to approval.
- 4. For on-call, hourly rate contracts, the PSC chair approves district and division consultant selections for master agreements.
134.2.2 Consultant Solicitation and Selection Process - Standard Solicitation Method
Outlined below is the step-by-step process for Standard Consultant Solicitation and Selection Method. The standard solicitation method is used for the majority of MoDOT Consultant projects. This method gives all consultants equal consideration during the solicitation process. Fig. 134.2.2 Processing Standard Consultant Contracts Checklist has been developed to help project managers through the paperwork process of hiring a consultant using the standard method.
188.8.131.52 Solicitation and Selection Step 1 – PE Funding
After the need to procure a consultant has been identified, the MoDOT Project Manager (PM) or Contract Administrator (CA) must first ensure that Preliminary Engineering (PE) funds are identified in the STIP for this project and if applicable, the TIP or appropriate MoDOT Budget. The PM/CA should work with their District Planning Manager if there is a need to revise the STIP and/or TIP to adjust the funding levels to match the project costs.
184.108.40.206 Solicitation and Selection Step 2 – PM/CA to Submit Solicitation & Request Letter to PSC
The PM/CA will work with the core team members to develop a more detailed scope of services for the consultant contract. The PM/CA will also need to identify the following items prior to sending a request to solicit for a consultant services to the PSC:
- 1. Construction Project Information – Project Description
- 2. Construction Project Information – Fiscal Year for Construction Project Award
- 3. Construction Project Information – Estimated project construction amount
- 4. Scope of Services – Detailed description of anticipated consultant services.
- 5. Project Funding – Total consultant contract costs (not to exceed amount).
- 6. Project Funding – Total consultant contract costs broken down by fiscal year.
- 7. Project Funding – Anticipated budget to be used for consultant services.
- 8. Project Funding – State or federal funds for PE. All projects must be evaluated to determine if it will have federal assistance. Work with your Design Liaison Engineer to make this determination.
- 9. Project Funding – Amount of PE dollars in the STIP
- 10. Project Funding – Cost Share/Cost Participation Information or federal earmark (if applicable)
- 11. DBE Requirements –Once the scope of work is defined, the MoDOT PM/CA must obtain a DBE Goal by sending the appropriate project information to MoDOT External Civil Rights (ECR) for review at DBEConsultGoal@modot.mo.gov. The DBE goal shall be included in the PSC solicitation request letter and the solicitation itself. All consultant contracts that utilize federal funds must be reviewed by ECR, regardless of the dollar amount of the contract.
- 12. Will consultant selection process include interviews or presentation – can be determined by the PSC
- 13. Period of Service – for the consultant contract.
- 14. Selection Process – for procurement of consultant (ex: Standard Solicitation, Modified Solicitation etc.). See Consultant Presentations and Interviews, below, to determine if they are needed.
- 15. Selection/Procurement Schedule – Anticipated schedule for procurement.
- 16. Anticipated Incentive/Disincentive Provisions – for the consultant contract (if applicable) See EPG 134.5.6 Incentive and Disincentive Program.
- 17. The PM/CA should include or delete the signature line, as needed, for any additional division director(s) (e.g., State Traffic and Highway Safety) who may need to review and sign the PSC letter.
All of the items listed above are the criteria that must be included in the Solicitation and Request Letter that is prepared by the PM/CA and sent to the PSC via the email group CODEPSCReview. The solicitation must not contain any information concerning man-hours, labor rates or cost information. If a maximum known value is available to fund the professional services contract, it may be noted in the solicitation to avoid submission of letters by consultants unable to provide the services for the expenditure MoDOT has determined as reasonable for the projects. Cost information can only be considered after a consultant has been selected and a contract is being negotiated. The solicitation should contain ALL of the rating categories that will be used to rate the consultant. MoDOT must follow RsMO 8.289 when evaluating the consultant but additional criteria can be added as long as it is published in the solicitation.
220.127.116.11 Solicitation and Selection Step 3 – Central Office Review of Solicitation Request
After the PSC receives the Solicitation and Request Letter, it will be distributed to the appropriate MoDOT Divisions and Central Office staff for review. If any comments need addressed, Central Office staff will forward revision requests to the District. When all parties involved agree on the content of the consultant solicitation/request for qualifications (RFQ), the PSC chair approves the request and Central Office will post the RFQ to the MoDOT's Consultant Services Webpage. An electronic notification of the RFQ is sent to Design Consultant Distribution List alerting interested parties of the opportunity.
18.104.22.168 Solicitation and Selection Step 4 – Consultant Response to the Solicitation/RFQ
Interested firms who wish to respond to the RFQ can submit a letter of interest. Beginning January 1, 2013, only firms listed on the Approved Consultant Prequalification List will be considered eligible for MoDOT projects. Cost information shall not be provided from the consultant at this time in the solicitation process. Cost can only be considered after a consultant is selected and the contract is being negotiated.
22.214.171.124 Solicitation and Selection Step 5 – Selection of Consultant
When the RFQ expires, MoDOT will evaluate the letters of interest or SOQ. The PM/CA must first email the PSC (Transportation Planning Director Machelle Watkins, State Bridge Engineer Dennis Heckman and State Design Engineer Eric Schroeter), and cc the appropriate liaison, a list of all consultants who responded to the solicitation (see below under Rating/Scoring the Consultants). The email must indicate whether or not the firms were prequalified. MoDOT's Approved Consultant Prequalification List contains the prequalification information on the firms. According to state law RsMO 8.291, MoDOT must list a minimum of 3 highly qualified firms and then select the firm best qualified to perform the work, based on the rating criteria outlined in the RFQ. It is not necessary to interview the firms, but should be considered. See Consultant Presentations and Interviews below for more information on presentations and interviews. When fewer than three responses are received, it is suggested that the RFQ be re-advertised at least once. If fewer than three responses are received again, then MoDOT must determine whether or not this is a suitable number of responses based on the nature and size of the project. Consider whether there was some aspect of the RFQ that was overly restrictive or otherwise had an adverse impact on the completion of the project. If the decision is made to move forward, then the district should document that the RFQ requirements were not restrictive, it was adequately publicized and that the one or two firms who responded were capable of performing the tasks outlined for the project. MoDOT will then rate all firms based on the criteria that was outlined in the RFQ. Performance evaluations from past MoDOT projects may be considered as part of the evaluation. Price quotations shall not be requested or used for consideration prior to selecting a firm. Price can only be determined AFTER the consultant is selected.
The Selection Team. The district and/or division forms a team to review the consultant responses and select a firm to provide the necessary services. In most cases, the team shall include at least three members, one of whom is from the Central Office (usually a Design or Structural Liaison Engineer). If a major component of the project is a specialty area supported only by Central Office staff, that division should be asked to participate as well. If the project is a project designated for federal involvement for any element related to Design, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) must be offered the opportunity to participate as a team member. Should another entity (KDOT, IDOT, MPO, city, county, etc.) be funding part of the cost of the work that entity must be offered the opportunity to participate as a member of the selection team. If the consultant’s team is expected to include a public involvement sub-consultant, the PSC, including the Community Relations Director, should be invited to participate on the team. Note: members of the PSC are non-voting members of the selection team.
Rating/Scoring the Consultants. Before any consultants are rated or short-listed, the PM/CA must email the PSC (Transportation Planning Director Machelle Watkins, State Bridge Engineer Dennis Heckman and State Design Engineer Eric Schroeter), and cc the appropriate liaison, a list of ALL consultants who responded to the RFQ. The PM/CA must allow 3 business days (from the date of the email) for the PSC to review the list of respondents prior to rating the firms.
If it was determined and noted in the solicitation request letter that the PM/CA was going to conduct interviews or presentations with the consultants, see Consultant Presentations and Interviews below for more information on how to rate and score the consultants. If interviews and/or presentations will not take place, the selection team can begin rating the consultants. The Consultant Rating Form, Fig. 126.96.36.199.1, can be used to rate and select the firm. The consultants MUST be rated based on the rating criteria that was published in the solicitation, adding or deleting criteria after the solicitation expires is not allowed.
Each member of the selection team will individually develop a numeric score to rate each firm using the categories listed in Fig. 188.8.131.52.1. The team will, as a group, compare these scores and discuss how they were determined. The team must reach consensus on the consultant to select. The team will create a rating summary as outlined in Fig. 184.108.40.206.2 clearly indicating which firm has been recommended for selection and documenting the selection process. The documentation must include written text on how the scores were determined. This documentation will be kept in the project file. A copy of all documentation must be sent to the Central Office via the email group CODEPSCReview along with a letter (Fig. 220.127.116.11.3) requesting approval of the selected consultant. The team must receive approval before notifying the consultant that was selected or any other parties. The approved selection will be posted at MoDOT's Consultant Services Webpage.
Consultant Presentations and Interviews
The majority of projects do not require interviews or presentations and the selection team may select by scoring the consultants and choosing the top ranked firm. Specific conditions that allow the selection to take place without interviews or presentations are as follows:
- The scope and cost of the contract is considered to be minor or routine in nature.
- The district or division is very familiar with the qualifications and capabilities of all the short-listed firms from previous services or presentations and believes presentations or interviews will not increase knowledge of the short-listed firms.
- The need for an accelerated selection process due to the critical nature of the contract.
If interviews and/or presentations are required, the selection team will first rate all the consultants based on the rating criteria published in the solicitation using Fig. 18.104.22.168.1 and as outlined above under Rating/Scoring the Consultants. Then the selection team will select the top 3-5 highest scoring firms and place them on a short list for further evaluation during presentations and/or interviews. The short list of consultants must first be approved by the PSC if the consultants will be required to interview or present. Fig. 22.214.171.124.4 is the short-list approval letter that must be sent to the PSC prior to notifying the firms that they have been short-listed. See below for Consultant Presentations and Consultant Interviews.
Consultant Presentations. The short list of consultants must first be approved by the PSC if the consultants will be required to present. Fig. 126.96.36.199.4 is the short-list approval letter that must be sent to the PSC prior to notifying the firms that they have been short-listed. The leader of the selection team should provide the opportunity for the PSC to attend the presentations. Before the presentations, the selection team must determine the scoring criteria (Fig. 188.8.131.52.5) to be used. These criteria can include many variables, but each element must be assigned a point value and expectations for assigning the maximum points should be developed. See the sample letter, Fig. 184.108.40.206.6, inviting the consultant to present. Following these presentations, the selection team will reach consensus on which consultant will be selected to provide the professional services.
After each consultant presentation, the selection team moves to a private location to discuss the presentation. After the final presentation, each member of the selection team will individually develop a numeric score to rate each firm based on the pre-determined criteria and scoring process. Although use of the example is not required, the criteria and scoring process must be determined prior to the actual presentation. The team will, as a group, compare these scores and discuss how they were determined; the team must reach consensus on the consultant to select.
The team will create a rating summary (Fig. 220.127.116.11.2) for all the firms, clearly indicating which firm is recommended for selection and documenting the selection process. The rating summary is only one tool used in the selection. Although selection of the highest scoring firm is not required, if it is not selected the reasons must be documented. This documentation will be kept in the project file. A copy of all documentation must be sent to the Central Office via the email group CODEPSCReview along with a letter (Fig. 18.104.22.168.3) requesting approval of the selected consultant. The team must receive approval before notifying the consultant that was selected or any other parties. The approved selection will be posted at MoDOT's Consultant Services Webpage.
Consultant Interviews. The short list of consultants must first be approved by the PSC if the consultants will be required to interview. Fig. 22.214.171.124.4 is the short-list approval letter that must be sent to the PSC prior to notifying the firms that they have been short-listed. For a feasibility study, environmental assessment, environmental impact statement, major river bridge design, or major investment study or at the PSC direction, the selection team should conduct interviews with the short-listed firms. This requires considerable preparatory work; however, the selection team can limit the number of consultant staff and specify particular individuals as well as the opening topics. (See Fig. 126.96.36.199.7 sample letter to interview). The leader of the selection team should provide the opportunity for the PSC to attend the interviews. Before the interviews, the selection team must determine the interview questions to be asked along with a description of the correct type of answer. Depending on the complexity of the questions, 15 to 18 questions will fill the time allotted. Additionally, the scoring criteria to be used must be pre-determined. These criteria can include many variables, but each element must be assigned a point value and expectations for allocating the maximum points should be developed. The consultants should not be allowed to bring anything into the interview. A sample format for an interview (with time guidelines) follows:
- During the interview, each team member individually scores the consultant as each question is answered. After each interview, the selection team discusses the consultant responses and averages the scores from the entire team. After the final interview, the team will, as a group, compare these scores and discuss how the firms rank; the team must reach consensus on the consultant to select. The team will create a rating summary clearly indicating which firm is recommended for selection and documenting the selection process. The rating summary is only one tool used in the selection. Although selection of the highest scoring firm is not required, if it is not selected the reasons must be documented. This documentation will be kept in the project file. A copy of all documentation must be sent to the Central Office via the email group CODEPSCReview along with a letter (Fig. 188.8.131.52.3) requesting approval of the selected consultant. The team must receive approval before notifying the consultant that was selected or any other parties. The approved selection will be posted at MoDOT's Consultant Services Webpage.
134.2.3 Consultant Solicitation and Selection Process – Modified Solicitation Method
Under specific circumstances it may be determined that the standard solicitation process is not appropriate to follow the complete QBS process . Each circumstance will be evaluated on a project by project basis. The Modified Solicitation Method may be considered on projects with an accelerated schedule, the emergency nature of the work affecting public safety or is highly specialized knowledge that would result in few consultants responding to the RFQ. Examples of this specialized work are, Hazardous Waste Services, Wetland Mitigation, Urgent Bridge projects and Historic Preservation. The PM/CA will contact their Design Liaison Engineer to determine if the project needs requires a PSC Modified Solicitation Approval and if deemed appropriate, will complete and submit the Solicitation and Request Letter (Fig. 184.108.40.206) to Design via the email group CODEPSCReview for PSC review and approval.
One of the three special conditions listed below warrant modified solicitation letters of interest:
- 1. The critical nature of the work requires an accelerated selection process. The term “critical nature” refers to tasks required as a result of unanticipated events, legal actions or compliance with directives from regulatory agencies. However, the PSC chair will consider these requests on a case by case basis.
- 2. The scope of services requires highly specialized knowledge and expertise that limits the number of qualified firms. Examples are underwater bridge inspection, designs to address environmental mitigation, and cultural resource investigations.
- 3. The work qualifies for the small purchase category. This category includes those contracts with a cost less than $25,000 and required services that are outside the work categories for an hourly rate contract.
134.2.4 Consultant Solicitation and Selection Process – Standard Solicitation Method for On-Call Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
Every three years MoDOT requests interested firms to respond to a Master Agreement RFQ, which lists specific work categories in a specific district or Central Office Division. The selected consultant is approved to only provide professional services under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the district/division in their selected work category. Each respective district/division evaluates the letters of interest from responding consultants, completes the consultant selection process, following RsMO 8.291, and requests PSC approval of the selected consultants. Once the PSC approves the selections, the Design Division drafts and executes a Master Agreement with each approved consultant and also maintains a list of consultants approved to provide services under the Master Agreement per district and/or division. The following lists the 20 specific work categories approved for the 2014-2017 Master Agreements:
- District Work Categories
- 1. Traffic Engineering
- 2. Traffic – Structures
- 3. Traffic ITS
- 4. Construction Materials Testing & Inspection
- 5. Roadway Design
- 6. Surveying
- 7. SUE
- Division Work Categories
- 1. Environmental Services – Hazardous Waste
- 2. Environmental - Noise & Special Studies
- 3. Environmental – Cultural Resources
- 4. LiDAR & Photogrammetry
- 5. Bridge Design
- 6. Traffic – Electrical Engineering
- 7. Pavement Testing
- 8. Traffic – Safety Data Analysis
- 9. General Services – Civil/Structural
- 10. General Services – Mechanical/Electrical
- 11. General Services – Arc/Interior Design
- 12. Geotechnical Services
- 13. DBE Services
Deletions or additions to the on-call consultant list require the PSC chair’s approval. Approval to use a consultant other than on the district’s or division’s approved list may be granted upon written request to the PSC in some circumstances. MoDOT's Consultant Prequalification Requirements webpage contains the lists of approved on-call consultants.
Information on the financial prequalification process for consultants can be found on MoDOT's Consultant Prequalification Requirements webpage. Consulting firms must be financially prequalified to be considered for selection to the on-call consultant list and must maintain their prequalification throughout the three year term of the Master Agreement. In order for the district/division to execute an MOU with a consultant, the selected consultant must be pre-qualified and have current E-Verify on file.
To ensure that on-call contracts are used as intended, the PSC has established several guidelines:
- 1. All district MOUs must be approved by the Design Liaison Engineer prior to selection of an on-call consultant to ensure all other resources have been considered.
- 2. The Master Agreement may be executed for a maximum period of three years, although the master agreement may include provisions for a one year extension at the end of the three-year period.
- 3. No single MOU will exceed a total cost of $200,000. Both the district and division may execute MOUs for a given job number with a maximum limit of $200,000, in aggregate. Neither the District, nor Central Office, may, in any instance, execute multiple MOUs for a single job for services that exceed a total of $200,000 in aggregate. MOUs within the $200,000 limit do not need prior PSC approval for execution and can be executed by the respective District Engineer or division engineer. If an MOU is near the $200,000 limit, the Project Manager/Contract Administrator (PM/CA) shall contact their Design Liaison Engineer to determine if the project will follow the guidance of EPG 134.2 Solicitation and Selection Process.
Master Agreement Execution Process
Outlined below is the process of executing the Master Agreement for On-Call Contracts.
- 1. The RFQ is posted to the web and electronic notification is sent to interested parties listed on the Design Consultant distribution list.
- 2. The district/division rates and develops a list of selected consultants.
- 3. The PSC chair approves the selection of consultants for specific work categories in each district/division.
- 4. Only Approved Pre-Qualified Consultants are eligible for Master Agreement. The pre-qualification process also includes a review of the firm’s overhead rates.
- 5. Since the amount of future services to be performed under the agreement is unknown, the allowable profit based upon direct labor cost is limited to 12 percent.
- 6. The Design Division develops a “Master Agreement” to be executed by the approved consultant(s). This agreement outlines the basic conditions of the contractual relationship and specifies the work category. The Master Agreement is the foundation for a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that the district or division later executes with a consultant to address the need for a specific scope of services in a specific work category.
- 7. Design Division instructs the consultant to submit two executed copies of the Master Agreement. The Design Division forwards the agreement to the CCO for approval as to form, then to the Commission Secretary for execution. Once MoDOT executes the Master Agreement, the Commission Secretary retains one copy and returns the remaining copy to the Design Division. Design then distributes copies as detailed in EPG 134.4 Contract Approval, Execution and Distribution.
The district or division then follows the procedures below for executing individual MOUs to obtain services as the need arises.
MoDOT MOU Execution Process
Fig. 134.2.4 Processing On-Call/MOU Consultant Contracts Checklist has been created to guide project managers through the process of hiring an on-call consultant through close- out of the MOU.
Outlined below is the process of executing an MOU for On-Call Contracts.
- 1. As of Jan 15, 2014, all MOUs will be federally funded, therefore, the Project Manager/Contract Administrator (PM/CA) must choose the federal MOU contract from CCO’s SharePoint site.
- 2. DBE Requirements – Once the scope of work is defined, the MoDOT PM/CA must obtain a DBE Goal by sending the appropriate project information (including scope, county, estimated construction cost, potential subcontracting opportunities) to MoDOT External Civil Rights (ECR) for review at DBEConsultGoal@modot.mo.gov. Once the DBE goal has been established by ECR, it shall be included in the MOU. All consultant contracts that utilize federal funds must be reviewed by ECR, regardless of the dollar amount of the contract.
- 3. If the prime consultant or any sub-consultants are DBE firms, the DBE section must be filled out. If the prime or subs are not DBE firms, the DBE section can be left blank.
- 4. The PM/CA will send the MOU to the consultant for execution.
- 5. The respective District Engineer or division engineer will execute the MOU as described in MHTC Policy "Delegation of Authority for Approval and Execution of Documents".
- 6. The PM/CA distributes copies of the executed agreement to the following Central Office Divisions; electronic notifications are required:
- Design, via email group "CODEPSCReview"
- Financial Services, via email group "Obligate". Note: The PM/CA MUST wait for obligation of federal funds before issuing the Notice To Proceed (NTP) to the consultant. Central Office - FS will send an email notification to the PM/CA indicating the obligation is complete.
- 7. The PM/CA will send the NTP letter (Fig 134.4.2) to the consultant AFTER federal funds are obligated.
134.3 Consultant Contract Negotiation
Price is negotiated after a consultant is selected and notified. This is the only time in the selection process when price can be considered. Beginning January 2013 only firms listed on the Approved Annual Financial Pre-Qualification List will be eligible to provide professional services to MoDOT. Additional scope beyond what was advertised in the RFQ cannot be negotiated into the contract.
The selected firm will need to use the provisional overhead rate that was accepted by MoDOT in that firms prequalification process with MoDOT. If the firm elects to voluntarily reduce their overhead rate the following language must be incorporated into the contract:
- “The Company has voluntarily reduced its overhead rate to ___%. This rate will be used on all billings. Upon completion of these services outlined under this Agreement the final payment for these items will be based on accounting records of the Consultant incurred during the period of the Agreement. MoDOT reserves the right to require the actual audited overhead rates be used if those rates are less than the voluntarily reduced rate noted previously.”
134.3.1 Engineering Services Contract (ESC)
Contract negotiation starts once the selection is made and should follow the schedule provided in the solicitation. Consult CCO early in the negotiation phase for any proposed changes in the boilerplate agreement language. Modifications to the standard agreement language may be considered only where no other compromise can be reached to successfully negotiate the agreement, and must be approved “as to form” by CCO. If the PM/CA works with their Regional Counsel to approve the revisions to the boilerplate agreement, that Regional Counsel will need to approve the partially executed contract “as to form”. In general, no changes are allowed to the ESC.
The standard contracts can be found in the SharePoint site, CCO contracts by Division - Design.
The MoDOT unit responsible for the contract, either the district or the division, provides the consultant with a printed, or PDF format electronic copy of the tentative contract. The tentative scope of services (including Specifications of Computer Deliverable Contract Plans) may be provided in a non-PDF electronic format. The PM/CA is responsible to complete the Consultant Contracts. Consultants do not receive electronic copies of MoDOT’s Sample Consultant Contract in a non-PDF format; any revisions to the standard consultant contract language must be approved by Chief Counsel’s input prior to execution of the contract.
After reviewing the tentative contract and scope of services, the consultant prepares a proposal containing a detailed estimate of cost that includes, man-hours, basic pay rates, pre-qualification accepted overhead rates, direct costs and fixed fee. Each of these items is reviewed by MoDOT to ensure it is reasonable with respect to the type of work involved and anticipated size of the contract. PM/CAs are responsible for the quality and content of professional services agreements. Fig. 134.3.1, District Checklist for Reviewing Executed Consultant Contracts is a tool provided for PM/CAs to utilize while reviewing contracts.
220.127.116.11 Liability Insurance
The MoDOT Standard Consultant Contract language includes provisions for the amount of liability insurance that the consultant must provide to cover claims that may result from errors, omissions, or negligent acts of the consultant. Insurance Certificate of Liability must meet Missouri’s Sovereign Immunity Limits. In rare instances, the PM/CA may request an Acceptance of MHTC Liability to reduce the insurance requirements on the consultants. This process must obtain PSC approval and follow the procedures outlined in the Acceptance of MHTC Liability, available through the CCO, depending on the nature and complexity of the services.
A copy of the certificate of liability insurance for the prime consultant is to be requested by the PM/CA and kept in the project files with the executed contract. It is the responsibility of the consultant to meet the insurance requirements of the contract. Receipt of the consultant’s certificate of insurance liability does not imply approval of the amounts.
18.104.22.168 Payment Bond
State statute requires that in the event that any subconsultants are used to supply at least twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000) worth of materials and/or labor not within the scope of environmental assessment services or licensed professional services as defined by Chapter 327, RSMo, the consultant shall require any such subconsultants to provide laborers and materialmen with adequate bond security.
The payment bond value shall equal the amount of the total subcontracted non-engineering services and applicable direct costs. If there is uncertainty about whether an item of work is considered as non-engineering or as an applicable direct cost, it should be included in the amount covered by the payment bond. Fully document all decisions regarding contracted services not included in the payment bond amount and retain in the project file until the contract has been closed and audited for final payments. A copy of the payment bond is to be requested by the project manager and kept in the district project files with the executed contract.
For more information on the payment bond language, see the standard engineering services contract on Chief Counsel’s intranet webpage.
134.3.2 Fixed Fee Review
The fixed fee is based on the complexity of the project, risk to the consultant, and the amount of sub consultant management and is the profit to the consultant. Fixed fees are calculations that are based upon direct salary costs. The percentage of the fixed fee to the direct salary costs must not exceed the MoDOT maximum allowable profit curve shown in Fig. 134.3.2 MoDOT Allowable Profit Curve. However, MoDOT does not allow a profit of more than 15 percent.
Fixed fees may not be calculated on direct expenses. Sub consultants are a direct expense to the prime consultant. Therefore, sub consultant expenses may not be included in the fixed fee calculations for the prime consultant. It should be noted that the “fixed fee” is fixed and will be paid in full even if the consultant does not use all of the hours in the contract. Care should be taken not to overestimate man-hours.
134.3.3 Man Hours Review
In order to establish a measure of “Fair & Reasonable” a pre-negotiation estimate is required by federal regulations in 49 CFR 18.36. The MoDOT PM/CA shall develop an estimate based on the man-hours that MoDOT would require to perform the same service. The consultant man-hour estimate is reviewed and compared to the MoDOT estimate. The consultant’s fee proposal submittal must include detailed hours and cost breakdowns by sub-task and by job title. For any subtask on the scope, it should be known how many different people, how many hours per person, any direct expenses, etc. for the prime and any subs. Negotiations should occur to assure that man-hours in the contract are comparable to the MoDOT estimated hours and those from similar projects. PMs should confer with the appropriate Central Office liaison engineer for concurrence with the review.
134.3.4 Basis of Payment
The majority of Design Consultant Engineering Services Contracts are actual cost contracts. This means that all costs submitted for payment must be based on actual wages, overhead. Federal regulations (FAR Part 16.102) prohibit the use of cost plus a percentage of cost or percentage of construction costs as a method of compensation. The following methods maybe used as the basis of payment in a contract:
- Actual Cost Plus Fixed Fee (majority of contracts)
- Specific rates of pay (for emergency situations only)
- Lump Sum (prior approval required)
- Hourly Rate (prior approval required)
Each Subcontractor or subconsultant must be identified in the contract. Subcontractor expenses should also be calculated based upon actual costs. Prompt payment of subconsultants is required per FAR Subpart 32.9.
Per EPG 22.214.171.124, if the consultant is using a subconsultant with a cost exceeding $25,000, then the subconsultant shall include a detailed estimate of cost and a detailed overhead rate schedule (cost plus fixed fee breakdown).
Per EPG 126.96.36.199, if the consultant is using a subconsultant with a cost that DOES NOT exceed $25,000 then a letter quote from the subconsultant can be submitted with the engineering service contract.
Retainage is not allowed as a routine part of the contract i.e. blanket retainage is prohibited. Payment may be withheld on any particular work item that has not been completed in accordance with the contract. This can include work incidental to the work item, and required documentation directly related to the work.
Direct costs must be estimated using current Privately Owned Vehicle (POV) mileage reimbursement rates and per diem rates for Missouri. These rates can be found on the following web pages.
Mileage, subsistence and lodging must follow federal travel regulation guidelines.
The use of subconsultants is allowed provided that each firm is identified in the engineering services contract. DBE firms should be listed under Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Requirements, and other subconsultants should be listed in Subconsultants. The use of 2nd and 3rd Tier subconsultants is not allowed, that is, only the prime consultant can have subconsultants, the subconsultants cannot have subconsultants. Subconsultants do not have to be prequalified but it is strongly encouraged especially if the subconsutlants routinely performs work >$25,000.
188.8.131.52 Subconsultant Cost Exceeding $25,000
If the consultant is using a subconsultant with a cost exceeding $25,000, then the subconsultant shall include a detailed estimate of cost and a detailed overhead rate schedule (cost plus fixed fee breakdown). Fig. 184.108.40.206.1 lists common unallowable costs. If the subconsultant is prequalified, the overhead rate listed must be the current overhead rate accepted by MoDOT through the annual financial prequalification process. In this case, a detailed overhead rate schedule would not be required.
If the subconsultant is not pre-qualified with MoDOT then the firm shall also include their Consultant Certification of Indirect Cost Form. Each subconsultant in this category must show its overhead in the required format. Fig. 220.127.116.11.2 provides an example Overhead Schedule. The detailed overhead rate schedule should be reviewed for possible unallowable costs per FAR Pt. 31, Fig. 18.104.22.168.1 lists common unallowable costs. The prime consultant is responsible for ensuring that all subconsultants comply with state and federal regulations, such as E-Verify, and are registered to do business in Missouri.
22.214.171.124 Subconsultant Cost NOT Exceeding $25,000
If the consultant is using a subconsultant with a cost that DOES NOT exceed $25,000 then a letter quote from the subconsultant can be submitted with the engineering service contract. The letter should quote the subconsultant’s cost shown in Exhibit III of the consultant contract. It is preferred however, that the subconsultants have cost plus fixed fee break down. If the subconsultant is not pre-qualified with MoDOT, the firm shall also include their Consultant Certification of Indirect Cost Form. The prime consultant is responsible for ensuring that all subconsultants comply with state and federal regulations, such as E-Verify, and are registered to do business in Missouri.
134.3.6 Ceasing Negotiation
If the district/division cannot negotiate a reasonable price with the consultant selected, they can formally cease negotiations with a formal written letter and begin negotiations with the next most qualified firm. After the district/division has ceased negotiations with the selected firm and have started negotiations with the next most qualified firm, they cannot go back to the first firm and start another round of negotiations; this is looked upon as price shopping and is unallowable. See the FHWA Consultant Services webpage for more information. If a contract cannot be negotiated with the second consultant, MoDOT may choose to negotiate with the third most qualified consultant. At any time, all proposals may be rejected and MoDOT can re-advertise the project with a revised scope.
134.3.7 Negotiation Documentation
All written correspondence with the consultant during the course of the negotiations is included in and made part of the project file for the consultant contract, including all email correspondence. Document in writing all verbal communication and personal visits with the consultant regarding the contract negotiations and also include in the project file. These records shall be maintained for a period of three years after the final invoice is submitted. If any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit or other action involving the records is started before the expiration of the three-year period, the records are retained until completion of the action and resolution of all issues arising from it or until the end of the three-year period, whichever is later.
134.3.8 Contract Assurances
Prior to executing a contract with a consultant, MoDOT will assure the following:
- 1. The consultant has been apprised of all applicable technical work requirements and administrative controls, including those of the FHWA and any other agencies that may have jurisdictions over the project.
- 2. After selection, the firm was provided all pertinent information relative to the desired engineering services or other professional services requested. The tentative contract set out the scope of the services in sufficient detail to provide the consultant with a definite knowledge of the services and results expected. The consultant was instructed to submit a proposal that indicated clearly identifiable, sufficiently detailed, and easily auditable charges for the work and/or units of work. These proposed charges (rates and man-hours) were reviewed for acceptability before negotiations proceeded.
- 3. Contracts include a requirement for a three-year retention of records after the final payment is made under the contract. On actual cost contracts, the consultant was informed that records must be open for inspection by authorized government personnel.
134.4 Contract Approval, Execution and Distribution
Once the district and the division agree to the man-hours, salary rates, overhead rates, direct costs, and fixed fee, the information is submitted to the PSC for review and for the PSC chair’s approval, via the email group CODEPSCReview. See Fig. 134.4.1. The submittal letter to the PSC documents that the above procedures have been followed and the requirements of Brooks Act, 23 CFR 172 and RSMO Section 8 have been satisfied. When approved by the PSC, the standard contract language, the scope of services and the consultant’s cost proposal are made part of a formal agreement for execution.
MHTC authorization to execute the contract may be obtained in one of following ways:
- Projects in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
- Projects Not Included in the STIP
To obtain authorization to execute contracts for projects that are not included in the approved STIP and have a contract ceiling exceeding $25,000, the contracts must be presented to the MHTC at a regularly scheduled monthly meeting. The appropriate division places these contracts on the Commission agenda for the next meeting. The District Engineer or division engineer should be prepared to discuss this item at the Commission meeting in case questions arise. After obtaining authorization to execute the contract from the Commission, the contract administrator forwards four copies of the contract, executed by the consultant, to CCO for approval as to form and then to the Commission Secretary, who has the appropriate individuals execute them.
The Commission’s approval of the STIP includes delegation of authority to execute professional services contracts for projects contained in the STIP. The district or division will mail three hard copies of the contract, executed by the consultant, to Central Office Design Division, who will submit them to CCO for approval as to form, and then to the Commission Secretary, who has the appropriate individuals execute them.
Central Office Design Division distributes copies of the executed contract. After the contract is executed, copies are provided to each of the following by Central Office Design, the PM/CA only needs to send an executed copy back to the consultant, all other copies are distributed by Central Office Design Division:
- 1 hard copy will be kept by commission secretary
- 2 hard copies mailed back to the district/division (1 copy for district/1 copy for consultant)
- Electronic copy to Financial Services Division (email group Obligate). NOTE: If federal funds are used, the PM/CA must wait for an email from Financial Services indicating that funds have been obligated prior to issuing a NTP to the consultant.
- Electronic copy to Design Division (email group CODEPSCReview)
- For federally funded projects only, an electronic copy to External Civil Rights for DBE Concurrence (email group DBEConcurrence).
- NOTE: If federal funds are used, the PM/CA must wait for an email from External Civil Rights (ECR) indicating concurrence in DBE participation, prior to issuing a NTP to the consultant.
If federal funds were used to finance the contract, Financial Services submits a copy of the executed contract to the FHWA Finance Section for approval. Federal funds will not be paid for charges to the contract prior to FHWA approval. Any supplemental agreements are also submitted to the FHWA after execution.
The project manager is responsible for sending a Notice to Proceed (NTP) Letter (Fig. 134.4.2) to the consultant. The NTP cannot be given prior to execution of the contract, or prior to federal funds being obligated for the project.
134.5 Consultant Contract Administration
A MoDOT employee will be assigned as the PM/CA for each contract, including contracts in which the services are for project management of a construction project or for contract administration. MoDOT's PM/CA is responsible for administering the contract and overseeing the consultant’s progress towards the provision of services required by the contract. Some of these responsibilities are:
- 1. Scheduling and attending progress meetings with the consultant and being involved in decisions leading to change orders or supplemental agreements.
- 2. Being familiar with the qualifications and responsibilities of the consultant’s staff.
- 3. Assuring that costs billed are consistent with the acceptability and performance of the consultant’s work.
- 4. Monitoring the consultant’s operations, as necessary, and adequately documenting contract performance (prior to final settlement of the contract) for later use.
- 5. Conducting interim technical and audit evaluations as deemed necessary during the performance of the consultant contract.
- 6. Completing performance evaluations in the Design Consultant Database at major milestones and at the completion of the contract. An evaluation is to be completed at least annually.
- 7. Notifying the Design Division, Financial Services and AI when a project is complete and finalized. The PM/CA should make arrangements with the Resident Engineer to be notified when construction is complete.
The consultant files a monthly invoice and progress report to the PM/CA. The invoice template found in Fig. 126.96.36.199 must be used for all consultant contracts. Prime consultant invoices must use Fig. 188.8.131.52. Sub-consultants who have a contract with the prime that is greater than $25,000 must either use Fig. 184.108.40.206 or provide all the information that is listed in this figure to be considered acceptable. Each invoice must be submitted with the necessary supporting documentation and must be numbered in sequential order and label the final invoice as FINAL. The invoice shall be based on the total incurred cost during the invoice period. Invoices should identify each task in the scope of work, as well as the employees and hours spent on each task during the billing period. Direct costs must also be shown by task. The MoDOT Consultant Invoice Checklist (Fig 220.127.116.11) can be used as tools to ensure all proper documentation is in place for each invoice in order for the invoice to be accepted and paid. Fig. 18.104.22.168 is available as an example of a filled-out invoice.
The PM/CA should make every effort to see that the consultant is paid in a timely manner, the goal being 30 days. Missouri law states that the consultant is entitled to interest if the invoice is not paid in 45 days. The 45-day period starts when all questions about the invoice have been addressed and agreed to by both parties.
The PM/CA sends a copy of the invoice to Financial Services with a cover letter or email stating that the PM/CA has reviewed the invoice and approves it for payment. Fig. 134.2.2 and Fig. 134.2.4 are checklists to help PM/CAs with the paperwork process for Standard and On-call contracts, including invoicing.
The letter or email should state:
- Project #
- Amount to be paid
- Entity/Vendor that is being paid
- Activity Code.
The following are the most frequently used activity codes:
|R356||Final Design Plans|
|R358||Final Construction Plans|
|R35A||Support – Build New Hwys & Bridges|
If the contract encompasses more than one job number, the cover letter or email and all invoices must clearly state how much is to be applied to each job number as well as the total contract. When the last invoice is submitted for payment, the cover letter or email must include a statement notifying Financial Services that the contract is complete (see EPG 134.5.3 Consultant Contract Close-Out).
If errors are found on the consultant invoice, the PM/CA should contact the consultant and request a corrected invoice. The PM/CA should never change an invoice. The invoice should be sent back to the consultant for corrects and they must re-date the invoice and re-submit to MoDOT. If the consultant makes an error and requests more reimbursement than allowed by the contract, the PM/CA may submit the invoice and authorize payment of an amount less than the invoice requests. The reasons for paying an amount different than the invoice requests must be clearly documented in the cover letter.
If the period of service in the contract has lapsed, a letter to extend the period of service signed by both MoDOT and the consultant must be completed prior to paying any invoices. For hourly-rate contracts the period of service is defined in the MOU not the Master Agreement.
Consultant invoices must be submitted electronically by the PM/CA to Financial Services at Contractual.Payments@modot.mo.gov.
Consultant invoices for projects administered by the Bridge Division should be submitted electronically by the consultant directly to BRInvoiceAdmin@modot.mo.gov.
Electronic payments to a consultant may be set up by submitting an “Electronic Funds Transfer” form. Information is available at MissouriBUYS.
22.214.171.124 Workforce Diversity Verification
The workforce diversity verification section of the template invoice (Fig. 126.96.36.199, Blank Consultant Invoice ) must be filled out. The verification summary should contain the project team’s diversity, not the company wide diversity. For reporting purposes, females and minorities are the only diversity categories that must be reported in the verification summary. The following groups are considered to be minorities: Black, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander. The report is based on the hours worked by minorities and women during the life of the contract.
134.5.2 Supplemental Agreements
Supplemental agreements, are to be used to add/delete work within the scope of services that was advertised in the RFQ. Supplemental agreements cannot be used to increase the scope of work outside the RFQ or to increase overhead or fixed fee. For example, a no cost supplemental agreement can be executed to extend the period of service as outlined in the original consultant contract.
Each supplemental agreement must include new subconsultants, and changes to the scope of services, new cost estimates and schedule or period of service adjustments as applicable.
Costs associated with these “new” services may be covered by the unit costs included in the original contract or by a newly negotiated cost in the supplemental agreement. When a supplemental agreement to an hourly rate contract is needed, the unit salary costs for the service provided by the supplement must be the same as those salary costs contained in the MOU. Direct costs and overhead costs for the services contained in the supplemental agreement should reflect the costs that will be in effect during the performance of the service.
Once it is determined that the scope of services needs modification, the PM/CA follows the same negotiation process for the supplemental agreement that is followed for new contracts through submission to the PSC, via the email group CODEPSCReview. Any change in the scope of services, whether it results in a change in cost or not, must be included in an approved supplemental agreement. If a DBE goal was established in the original contract it will continue to apply. The agreement must be executed prior to the consultant receiving authorization to proceed with the modified scope of services. Supplemental Agreements for extension of time, with no additional cost, are not required to be submitted through the PSC. The district or division director has the delegation of authority to sign the Supplemental Agreement. The executed copy of the Supplemental Agreement must be submitted through CODEPSCReview.
When a supplemental agreement is necessary, additional funds to cover the added costs in the contract must be identified from the appropriate budget category and be approved as a necessary expenditure. The contract information is submitted to the PSC via the email group CODEPSCReview using PSC Approval to Execute Supplemental Agreement, Fig. 134.5.2. After PSC approval has been granted, the district or division will mail three hard copies of the supplemental agreement, executed by the consultant, to the Design Division, who will submit them to CCO for approval as to form, and then to the Commission Secretary, who has the appropriate individuals execute them.
Central Office Design Division distributes copies of the executed supplemental agreement. After the supplemental agreement is executed, copies are provided to each of the following by Central Office Design, the PM/CA only needs to send an executed copy back to the consultant, all other copies are distributed by Central Office Design Division:
- 1 hard copy will be kept by commission secretary
- 2 hard copies mailed back to the district/division (1 copy for district/1 copy for consultant)
- Electronic copy to Financial Services Division (email group Obligate). NOTE: If federal funds are used, the PM/CA must wait for an email from Financial Services indicating that funds have been obligated prior to issuing a NTP to the consultant.
- Electronic copy to Design Division (email group CODEPSCReview)
- Electronic copy to External Civil Rights.
If federal funds were used to finance the contract, Financial Services submits a copy of the executed contract to the FHWA Finance Section for approval. Federal funds will not be paid for charges to the contract prior to FHWA approval.
134.5.3 Consultant Contract Close-Out
To close out a consultant contract the PM/CA must notify Design and Financial Services that the last invoice is the FINAL invoice and to close out the contract. See EPG 134.5.1 Invoicing for information on invoicing and the appropriate email addresses to send the FINAL invoices.
Final Audit. MoDOT conducts a final audit to determine total allowable contract costs, unless the contract is on a firm, fixed-price basis. Allowable cost principles are identified based on the experience of MoDOT personnel in administering past contracts and in accordance with applicable requirements of 48 CFR Part 31, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), and 23 CFR 172, Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service Contracts.
The PM/CA is responsible for notifying Design when the contract is substantially complete. The final audit may be conducted any time after the project is let; the consultant contract need not be completed for the final audit to be conducted.
Should MoDOT agree prior to contract execution that it is necessary for a consultant to purchase special equipment, materials, or property to accomplish the required services, MoDOT will establish a before and after value and will receive an appropriate credit for any residual values. This credit is passed on to FHWA.
134.5.4 Consultant Performance Appraisals
The MoDOT PM/CA must perform an Online Evaluation of the consultant’s performance under any engineering services contract with MoDOT at each project milestone and at a minimum, on an annual basis during the term of the consultant’s services provided by the contract. Input for the evaluation should be requested from other divisions that may have project experience with the company, such as the Environmental section, or Construction Division. MoDOT’s PM/CA also completes a final comprehensive evaluation of the consultant’s performance within 30 days after contract completion. The evaluation is included in the project file. MoDOT personnel complete another evaluation of the consultant’s performance within 30 days of completion of the construction phase of the project. The evaluation must contain written comments on how the evaluation was determined. All evaluation comments must be factual and not based upon personal opinion, i.e. all comments must be able to be backed up by actual facts.
Upon completing any evaluation, furnish a copy to the consultant prior to meeting with the district or division project manager to discuss the evaluation. These evaluations are included in MoDOT’s Design Consultant Database and are used during consideration of the consultant for future work assignments. The PM/CA is defined as the project manager, or other person who is responsible for reviewing and approving the consultant’s invoices.
134.5.5 Restitution for Errors and Omissions
At times, errors or omissions in the project design or in the information provided for the project may become evident during a project’s bidding or construction phases. When this occurs, the causes surrounding the errors or omissions are investigated to determine a final resolution, which may require financial restitution. A face-to-face meeting between the DE and the consultant will take place to discuss the situation.
The procedure for investigating errors or omissions is:
- 1. Contractor/RE initializes a change order with the reason code – CD (Consultant Design Error). The RE and PM from Construction and Design review the change order and develop recommendation for action and assessment of both direct and indirect costs.
- 2. The District Construction and Material Engineer and the District Engineer review and provide comments.
- 3. The District Engineer reviews and makes final district recommendations. Form is forwarded to the Construction Division.
- 4. The Construction Division Liaison Engineer, the Design Division Liaison Engineer and CCO jointly make the final decision regarding pursuit of reimbursement. The district is informed of the decision.
- 5. If the decision is to pursue recovery of costs, then CCO drafts a “Letter of Notice” for the District Engineer’s signature.
- 6. The District Engineer sends the Letter of Notice to the Controller’s Division – Accounts Receivable Section (CT A/R) requesting an invoice be created. A copy is to be sent to the Design Division.
- 7. Upon receipt of DE’s Letter of Notice to the design consultant, Controller’s Division will create an invoice for the amount of the claim and submit it directly to the design consultant with the Letter of Notice. The revenue source code of 1814-05 “Design Consultant Claims” will be used to track reimbursement by design consultants.
- 8. If the consultant does not respond by the “respond by date” in the Letter of Notice, then the Design Liaison Engineer presents the background information to senior management, who make a decision whether or not to begin legal proceedings to pursue reimbursement of costs. If legal proceedings are pursued, Design Liaison Engineer notifies Controller’s Division – Accounts Receivable.
Should formal dispute resolution as detailed in EPG 134.6 Dispute Resolution be initiated during the above procedure, the following steps will ensure MoDOT receives payment:
- 1. The PM/CA, with the help of CCO, prepares and provides the controller with a letter from the State Design Engineer to the consultant indicating the Dispute Resolution Committee’s (DRC) decision and the dollar amount of restitution.
- 2. The controller prepares an invoice for the amount of the restitution payment and sends it to the consultant with the letter from the State Design Engineer. A copy of the letter and invoice is provided to the Design Division and the district. These documents indicate the payment is made to Department of Revenue – Credit State Road Fund and mailed to:
- Missouri Department of Transportation
- Controller’s Office
- P.O. Box 270
- Jefferson City, Mo. 65102
- The controller will track the invoice to ensure payment is received from the consultant in a timely manner.
134.5.6 Incentive and Disincentive Program
MoDOT has instituted an incentive and disincentive program with the consulting industry to assure that consultants:
- 1. Deliver the most cost-efficient design that provides the right solution to the identified need (i.e., Practical Design)
- 2. Deliver quality plans
- 3. Deliver the roadway and bridge design plans on time as required in the contract
- 4. Prepare construction cost estimates that are within an acceptable range of the contract award amount.
The incentive and/or disincentives vary according to the listed category. This program will not be used on every MoDOT roadway and bridge design contract. The incentive and disincentives will be used in whole or in part on major projects that are critical to MoDOT accountability with the public. Fifty percent of the fixed fee is the maximum disincentive that can be incurred. When the district requests approval from the PSC chair to solicit consultant services, the approval will specify whether the contract will or will not include the incentive/disincentive program. Project specific incentives and disincentives will be noted in the contract agreement.
Cost-effective Design (Practical Design) and Quality Plans. The consultant’s performance on delivering the most cost-efficient design that provides the right solution for the identified need will become a part of the consultant performance evaluation. Quality of Plans will be based on the score for overall performance.
Evaluation scores must be considered on all future contract selections. Consultants who perform poorly or who do not deliver cost-effective designs will not be considered for future contracts until they demonstrate to MoDOT that significant changes have been made within their company to address the concerns. The PSC will monitor this performance and MoDOT staff will be kept informed on the status of any firms that are not being allowed to compete for projects.
Deliver Roadway and Bridge Design Plans on Time.
- Right of Way Plans. The project manager should use the flowchart below to determine whether the incentives or disincentive are applicable based on the scheduled delivery date contained in the current contract or supplemental agreement. If changes are made by MoDOT that impact scheduling, the letting date may be re-negotiated .
- Final Plans, Surveys, and Estimates. The project manager should use the flowchart below to determine whether the incentive or disincentive is applicable based on the scheduled delivery date contained in the current contract or supplemental agreement. If changes are made by MoDOT that impact scheduling, the letting date will be re-negotiated.
- Accurate Cost Estimates are critical for MoDOT to be able to deliver the program promised to the public. Program estimates are published in the STIP and each district programs sufficient projects each year to spend every dollar allocated. Poor estimating causes MoDOT numerous problems at letting. Once the project budget has been set it is then the design consultant’s responsibility to design a good project that satisfies the purpose and need within that budget. The project manager should use the flowchart below to determine whether the consultant qualifies for an incentive or disincentive based on their project estimates.
134.6 Dispute Resolution
Once a consultant is selected to work for MoDOT, circumstances may arise that lead to a dispute between MoDOT’s PM/CA and the consultant. In most cases, a complete understanding and recognition of each party’s concerns will result in successful resolution of the disagreement. However, when that is not the case, this dispute resolution procedure is used.
The relationship between the consultant and MoDOT is a professional contractual relationship. All parties to the contract should understand the dispute resolution process. The PM/CA and the consultant should make every attempt to fully understand the dispute and express honest statements of fact prior to initiating formal dispute resolution. In this context, the PM/CA is defined as the person who authorizes MoDOT’s payment of the consultant invoices.
Before initiating formal dispute resolution, the following activities should occur:
- 1. The district engineer, or division engineer (hereinafter indicated by “DE”) prepares a letter to the consultant outlining the contested issues.
- 2. The disputing parties (project manager level for both MoDOT and consultant) participate in a face-to-face meeting.
- 3. The consulting firm conveys the firm’s recommendations for resolving the dispute.
- 4. MoDOT’s representative discusses the consultant’s proposed resolution and responds in a letter, either accepting the proposal or offering a rebuttal.
- 5. MoDOT and the consultant attempt to negotiate a settlement.
If the PM/CA and the consultant reach an agreement that provides the consultant with payment greater, or less than the contract maximum, the PM/CA needs to initiate a supplemental agreement and follow normal procedures to get the supplemental agreement executed, including approval by the PSC. If no settlement is forthcoming, formal dispute resolution is initiated.
134.6.1 Initiating Formal Dispute Resolution
When attempts between the PM/CA and the consultant have failed to resolve the disagreement, the consultant should enumerate the firm’s concerns in a letter to the DE, thereby initiating formal dispute resolution. A Dispute Resolution File should be started by the PM/CA.
Disagreements may arise over the scope of services, fees, hours, the consultant evaluation, errors and omissions, or other issues. Initiation of the resolution process will in no way be reflected on negatively in the consultant’s performance evaluation. The consultant’s letter to the DE should specifically outline the disagreement and the consultant’s view of the issues. This detailed letter must include:
- 1. A clear description of the items that are being disputed
- 2. What the consultant desires to resolve the dispute
- 3. Background—the sequence of events that led to the dispute
- 4. Documentation to support the request
- 5. All correspondence between the parties relating to the items in dispute (including e-mail)
- 6. A listing of previous attempts to resolve the issue (including e-mail)
- 7. A copy of the contract and any supplemental agreements
Upon receiving the consultant’s letter and documentation, the DE will have the PM/CA prepare a similar letter, also addressed to the DE, outlining the administrator’s view of the disagreement with particular attention to the information in the consultant’s letter. MoDOT may also initiate formal dispute resolution by the PM/CA sending a letter, under the DE’s signature, to the consultant contact listed in the contract. The consultant should be directed to respond to the department’s letter. As a courtesy, the PM/CA should notify the consultant project manager before writing this letter.
134.6.2 Dispute Review by District or Division Engineer
The PM/CA transmits the letter documenting the issues of the dispute, with the consultant’s letter attached, to MoDOT’s DE for review. In addition, the DE also notifies the Assistant Chief Engineer and the State Design Engineer that formal dispute resolution has been initiated. With this notice, the State Design Engineer begins tracking the dispute resolution process. Whenever the two parties in the dispute reach a resolution, the State Design Engineer should be notified of the following:
- 1. Where in the process resolution was reached
- 2. The date resolution was reached
- 3. What resolution was reached
The DE evaluates the information in the letters, discussing it with the PM/CA and the consultant project manager as necessary.
134.6.3 Meeting of the Two Parties
The DE arranges a meeting with the consultant principal. If an agreement is reached after discussion between the DE and the consultant principal, the DE provides a letter to the firm indicating the terms of the agreement. However if agreement is still not reached, the dispute may be taken to the Dispute Resolution Committee.
134.6.4 Dispute Resolution Committee
The Dispute Resolution Committee (DRC) is comprised of the Assistant Chief Engineer (acting as chair), Director of External Civil Rights, and Chief Financial Officer. In preparation for the DRC’s meeting, the DE will share written details of the formal dispute resolution’s outcome to this point with the State Design Engineer who then facilitates the DRC procedures. The committee will review this information together with other background information, including the original letters from the PM/CA and the consultant project manager outlining the dispute. When the committee meets, all representatives of the disputing parties are given the opportunity to attend. The DRC discusses the issues with the disputing parties and tries to reach a resolution satisfactory to both parties. If a resolution cannot be reached, an offer of mediation is made to the two parties. Should both parties agree to use mediation to settle the claim, they will share the cost of mediation equally.
If an agreement is reached, the DRC sends the consultant a letter outlining the resolution of the dispute.
A mediator is an outside party who facilitates a discussion between the disputing parties and enables them to explore options to reach agreement. Responsibility for dispute resolution is solely that of MoDOT and the consultant. The mediator has knowledge of the process and the general terms of the dispute but is not intimately knowledgeable of all project details.
After the consultant has accepted MoDOT’s offer for mediation, the State Design Engineer is responsible for making arrangements for a mediator. This includes selecting an approved mediator from a list (developed jointly by ACEC and MoDOT) and arranging the time and place of the meeting. Participants at the meeting are limited to the DE, the DRC’s chair, the consultant principal, and the mediator. Others, including the PM/CA and the consultant project manager, are not active participants in this meeting but may provide information if the mediator so requests. Legal representation is optional. The disputing parties are responsible for their own costs associated with the mediation but will share all expenses associated with the mediator equally.
Should the mediation result in the dispute’s resolution, the DRC sends the consultant a letter explaining the resolution of the dispute. However, should the mediation not result in resolution of the dispute, the issue is forwarded to MoDOT's Chief Engineer for final action.
134.6.6 Final Decision by the DRC
When mediation fails, the State Design Engineer will notify the DRC and MoDOT’s Chief Engineer and provide any additional information gathered during the mediation process. The Chief Engineer will review the information provided and if desired, meet with the members of the DRC to discuss the results of the dispute resolution process up to that point. Upon decision by the Chief Engineer, the State Design Engineer provides a letter to the DE and the consultant principal informing them of the decision. When the consultant receives the letter from the State Design Engineer outlining the decision of the Chief Engineer, the firm may respond; however, formal dispute resolution will have been completed and MoDOT will not entertain further appeals from the consultant.
Articles in "134 Engineering Professional Services"
This category contains only the following page.