Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
m (EPG 130.1.3) |
m (new photo) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|valign="top" style="border: 1px solid #A9A9A9; color: #000; background-color: #F8F8FF"| | |valign="top" style="border: 1px solid #A9A9A9; color: #000; background-color: #F8F8FF"| | ||
{| style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto" | {| style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |colspan="2"| [[image:Main Page Oct 21, 2013.jpg|center|390px|thumb|<center>''' [http://www.modot.org/stlouis/major_projects/TowerGroveInterchange.htm Reconstruction of the I-64 interchange at Tower Grove] is underway. BJC HealthCare and Washington Univ. in St. Louis have partnered with MoDOT to improve the flow of traffic around Kingshighway and into the medical campus. '''</center> ]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="2"| [[image:Main Page Oct 17, 2013.jpg|center|390px|thumb|<center>''' NE District Engineer Paula Gough and Hannibal Mayor Roy Hark (far right) cut the ribbon across Rte. 79 south of Hannibal officially dedicating the [[:Category:641 Bicycle Facilities#641.1 Types of Facilities|paved shoulders marked as bicycle lanes]] that were part of an 8-mile resurfacing project. '''</center> ]] | |colspan="2"| [[image:Main Page Oct 17, 2013.jpg|center|390px|thumb|<center>''' NE District Engineer Paula Gough and Hannibal Mayor Roy Hark (far right) cut the ribbon across Rte. 79 south of Hannibal officially dedicating the [[:Category:641 Bicycle Facilities#641.1 Types of Facilities|paved shoulders marked as bicycle lanes]] that were part of an 8-mile resurfacing project. '''</center> ]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |colspan="2"| [[image:Main Page Oct 16, 2013.jpg|center|390px|thumb|<center>''' Sr. Mtnc. Worker Greg Coffey (standing) and Mtnc. Crew Leader Mike Flake are part of the crew replacing 29 culverts on Warren Co. Rte. U. The 12-mile, curvy road was closed at each culvert, yet crews accommodated emergency responders, schools and area residents by alerting them of the closures well ahead of time. '''</center> | + | | colspan="2"| [[image:Main Page Oct 16, 2013.jpg|center|390px|thumb|<center>''' Sr. Mtnc. Worker Greg Coffey (standing) and Mtnc. Crew Leader Mike Flake are part of the crew replacing 29 culverts on Warren Co. Rte. U. The 12-mile, curvy road was closed at each culvert, yet crews accommodated emergency responders, schools and area residents by alerting them of the closures well ahead of time. '''</center> ]] |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|} | |} | ||
Line 47: | Line 43: | ||
{| style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto" | {| style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | colspan="2"| [[image:Main Page Oct | + | | colspan="2"| [[image:Main Page 2 Oct 16, 2013.jpg|center|390px]] |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | colspan="2" align="center"| ''' Workers epoxy small gravel to a curve on U.S. 54 at Madison St. in Jefferson City. This $84,000 High Friction Surface treatment will provide motorists more traction in rainy, icy and snowy conditions. ''' | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | colspan="2"| [[image:Main Page 2 Oct 16, 2013 2.jpg|center|390px]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
{| style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto" style="background-color: #F8F8FF" | {| style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto" style="background-color: #F8F8FF" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |colspan="2"|'''Perhaps you've wondered how many hits the most popular EPG articles have. As of | + | |colspan="2"|'''Perhaps you've wondered how many hits the most popular EPG articles have. As of late October, the numbers of hits are:''' |
|- | |- | ||
− | |'''20.''' [[:Category:134 Engineering Professional Services|EPG 134]], | + | |'''20.''' [[:Category:134 Engineering Professional Services|EPG 134]], 83918 ||'''10.''' [[136.12 Figures, Glossary and Other Useful Links|EPG 136.12]], 125384 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |'''19.''' [[751.5 Standard Details|EPG 751.5]], | + | |'''19.''' [[751.5 Standard Details|EPG 751.5]], 84228 ||'''9.''' [[:Category:200 GEOMETRICS|EPG 200]], 127081 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |'''18.''' [[136.4 Consultant Selection and Consultant Contract Management|EPG 136.4]], | + | |'''18.''' [[136.4 Consultant Selection and Consultant Contract Management|EPG 136.4]], 87315 ||'''8.''' [[:Category:101 Standard Forms|EPG 101]], 127292 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |'''17.''' [[136.9 Plans, Specs and Estimates (PSE)|EPG 136.9]], | + | |'''17.''' [[136.9 Plans, Specs and Estimates (PSE)|EPG 136.9]], 87589 ||'''7.''' [[616.23 Traffic Control for Field Operations|EPG 616.23]], 148094 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |'''16.''' [[903.6 Warning Signs|EPG 903.6]], | + | |'''16.''' [[903.6 Warning Signs|EPG 903.6]], 88298 ||'''6.''' [[:Category:600 INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION|EPG 600]], 158002 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |'''15.''' [[:Category:400 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT|EPG 400]], | + | |'''15.''' [[:Category:400 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT|EPG 400]], 89924 ||'''5.''' [[:Category:100 GENERAL|EPG 100]], 192008 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |'''14.''' [[751.40 Widening and Repair (Non-LRFD)|EPG 751.40]], | + | |'''14.''' [[751.40 Widening and Repair (Non-LRFD)|EPG 751.40]], 91819 ||'''4.''' [[:Category:700 STRUCTURES AND HYDRAULICS|EPG 700]], 198102 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |'''13.''' [[620.2 Pavement and Curb Markings (MUTCD Chapter 3B)|EPG 620.2]], | + | |'''13.''' [[620.2 Pavement and Curb Markings (MUTCD Chapter 3B)|EPG 620.2]], 95389 ||'''3.''' [[:Category:900 TRAFFIC CONTROL|EPG 900]], 215578 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |'''12.''' [[:Category:903 Highway Signing|EPG 903]], | + | |'''12.''' [[:Category:903 Highway Signing|EPG 903]], 105216 ||'''2.''' [[:Category:751 LRFD Bridge Design Guidelines|EPG 751]], 227014 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |'''11.''' [[:Category:616 Temporary Traffic Control|EPG 616]], | + | |'''11.''' [[:Category:616 Temporary Traffic Control|EPG 616]], 123646 ||'''1.''' EPG Main Page, 1292453 |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 11:50, 21 October 2013
HELPFUL EPG VIDEOS: | •Logging into the EPG | |
•Finding Info in the EPG | ||
•Article History & How to Receive EMails When Articles are Revised | ||
___________ | ||
Want help on how to update your EPG guidance? It is available at EPG Approval Process. | ||
___________ | ||
The Electronic MoDOT Spec Book for Mobile Devices is now available |
RECENT POLICY CHANGES IN THE EPG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MoDOT has made great strides to build a good transportation system and increase taxpayers' trust in its ability to deliver what was promised. Innovative concepts, such as Practical Design and design-build, were used to deliver those commitments and have made MoDOT a leader in the transportation industry. These forward-thinking, innovative concepts are reflected in the ENGINEERING POLICY GUIDE (EPG). This document provides a single reference for all engineering and engineering-related guidance by combining the former Right of Way, Design, Bridge, Construction, Traffic and Maintenance manuals. MediaWiki, the engine behind the Wikipedia on the World Wide Web, is the software delivering the EPG. Millions of hits on the EPG endorse this format to be easy to navigate and pleasing to read. A small HELP ARTICLE is included to assist with helpful hints on how to use the EPG as well as other points of interest.
|
EPG 130.1.3 VE Workplan/Project Selection 10/18/13: 10/18/13: Guidance was updated to comply with MAP-21, the federal surface transportation law. Now, NHS projects costing at least $50,000,000 and NHS bridge projects costing at least $40,000,000 require a Value Engineering (VE) study. (Previously, VE studies were required for NHS projects costing $25M and NHS bridge projects costing $20M.) Projects delivered by the Design/Build method are not required to have a VE study. EPG 806 Pollution, Erosion and Sediment Control 10/18/13: For greater convenience, a few Maintenance forms for erosion and sediment control have been added at the top of the article. 10/18/13: The requirements for invoicing consultant contracts were slightly updated. Invoice cover letters are only to be sent to the Fincial Services Division, not the Design Division. Relocation of Service Signs (Logo Signs) on Construction Projects 10/11/13: Guidance in line with existing practice on how to perform temporary or permanent relocation of Logo signs has been added to EPG 616.18 Construction Inspection Guidelines. This guidance is especially helpful to REs and designers. EPG 751.22.3.8 Camber, Haunching and Girder Steps 10/11/13: Limits for prestressed girder haunching will now be reported to the nearest 1/8”. New QRG 10/11/13: A new QRG, Equipment Verification Samples, is now available. Work Zone Capacity, Queue and Travel Delay for Interstates, Freeways and Multi-lane Roadways 10/10/13: The Work Zone Impact Analysis Spreadsheet Directions form was updated with guidance describing Equivalent Trucks. A synopsis sheet was also added. New Test Method 10/8/13: EPG 106.3.2.64 TM-64, Void Detection and Undersealing Verification Testing of Concrete Pavement with a Falling Weight Deflectometer is now available. The previous TM-64 was deleted in 2012. Increased Access to Safety Policies 10/4/13: For greater convenience, the listing of safety-related policies has been expanded. 10/4/13: A new form, Guidance for Completing the CUF Form, was added. EPG 136.3.8.10 Traffic Engineering Assistance Program (TEAP) 10/1/13: EPG 906 TEAP has been moved to EPG 136.3.8.10 TEAP. The modified EPG language reflects Design Division timelines and processes. One of the main process changes is that the TEAP studies will be provided through on-call consultants. (Local agencies will select a consultant from an approved list of on-call consultants to complete a TEAP study for them.) The TEAP application has also been completely revised to resemble other DE or LPA standard applications. In FY 2014, the Traffic & Highway Safety Division and the Local Programs group will partner to administer TEAP. The TEAP processes and timelines will remain the same. In FY 2015, the administration of TEAP will be through the Local Programs group. EPG 751.22.3.8 Camber, Haunching and Girder Steps 10/1/13: A note was added to clarify the camber diagram. 9/27/13: Guidance was clarified about which conditions require fatal crash reviews. Submitting a Bridge Survey Report 9/25/13: In EPG 748.7.3.12 Submission, the guidance was clarified about what files need to be submitted. 9/24/13: New guidance has been provided to clarify how contractors must submit documentation for the wages of apprentices. The new guidance is #7c. Documentation of Traffic Control Devices Installations 9/20/13: Guidance in EPG 616.18 Construction Requirements was expanded to clarify how to produce documentation so as to avoid the possibility of paying for a device more than once. 9/20/13: Guidance for diary notations about accounting on contractor equipment and personnel has been clarified and slightly expanded. Annual Report for Automated Enforcement of Red-Light Violations 9/20/13: In EPG 950.1.1, the above form was added for reporting violations. 9/19/13: Numerous minor updates have been made to this Right of Way article. For instance, the archaic guidance of EPG 236.3.4.13's Central Office Review and Approval was removed. Two forms, Right of Way Cost Estimate Worksheet and Right of Way Cost Estimate, were also updated. EPG 127.13.10 Noise Wall Public Meeting and Voting 9/17/13: Guidance has been added to clarify current practice. EPG Other Aspects of Pavement Design 9/11/13: "Pavement Design for Scoping" was removed from this article it presented a set of ME tables that are now outdated. The MEPDG design tables will eventually be replaced but conflict with industry at this time. EPG 237.9.6.8 Consultant Designed Projects 9/9/13: Consultants need to include the Certificate of Authority number in the title block. Contract Leveling Course Guidelines Job Special Provisions 9/9/13: The CLC JSPs in EPG 402 Bituminous Surface Leveling were updated. The quality control and RAP and RAS JSPs were modified and the tack coat JSP was removed. Forms in EPG 236.7 Negotiation 9/6/13: Several forms (Offer Letter - Combined Fee and Tenant Owners - Use Prior to Condemnation (Form 7.2.5D), Offer Letter - Fee Owner (Form 7.2.5A), Offer Letter - Tenant Owner No Disclaimer (Form 7.2.5B2) and Offer Letter - Tenant Owner with Disclaimer (Form 7.2.5B1)) were updated due to a request from FHWA. EPG 321.3 Procedures for Estimation of Geotechnical Parameter Values and Coefficients of Variation 9/5/13: This article has been generally expanded and updated to match current and established practices. |